Suppose that \(f(x, y)=x y .\) Find the maximum value for / if \(x\) and \(y\) are constrained to sum to \(1 .\) Solve this problem in two ways: by substitution and by using the Langrangian multiplier method.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The maximum value of the function is \(\frac{1}{4}\) at the point \((\frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{2})\).

Step by step solution

01

Method 1: Substitution

Since we know that \(x+y=1\), we can easily solve for one variable in terms of the other. Let's solve for \(y\): $$y = 1-x$$ Now, we can substitute this expression for \(y\) in the function \(f(x, y)\): $$f(x, 1-x) = x(1-x)$$ To find the maximum value, we should find the critical points by taking the derivative of the function with respect to \(x\) and set it to zero: $$\frac{d}{dx}(x(1-x)) = (1-x)-x = 1-2x$$ Now, let's find the critical points: $$1-2x=0 \Rightarrow x=\frac{1}{2}$$ Substitute back into \(y\) expression: $$y=1-x \Rightarrow y=1-\frac{1}{2}=\frac{1}{2}$$ The maximum value for \(f(x,y)\) is at the point \((\frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{2})\), so: $$f_{max}(x, y) = f\left(\frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{2}\right) = \frac{1}{2} * \frac{1}{2} = \frac{1}{4}$$
02

Method 2: Lagrangian Multipliers

To solve the problem by using the Lagrangian multiplier method, we first set up the Lagrangian function with a multiplier \(\lambda\), let's denote \(g(x,y)=x+y\): $$\mathcal{L}(x, y, \lambda) = f(x, y) - \lambda(g(x,y)-1) = xy - \lambda(x+y-1)$$ Now, in order to find the maximum value, we have to find where the gradient of the Lagrangian is equal to zero: $$ \nabla \mathcal{L}(x, y, \lambda) = \begin{bmatrix} \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial x}\\ \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial y}\\ \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \lambda} \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} y - \lambda \\ x - \lambda \\ x + y - 1 \end{bmatrix} = 0$$ Solve these equations simultaneously for \(x\), \(y\), and \(\lambda\): $$\begin{cases} y - \lambda = 0 \\ x - \lambda = 0 \\ x + y - 1 = 0 \end{cases}$$ From the first two equations, we can conclude that \(x=y\), and the third equation becomes: $$x+x-1=0 \Rightarrow x=\frac{1}{2}$$ Substitute back into the first equation: $$y - \lambda = 0 \Rightarrow y=\lambda=\frac{1}{2}$$ The maximum value for \(f(x,y)\) is obtained at the point \((\frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{2})\), so: $$f_{max}(x, y) = f\left(\frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{2}\right) = \frac{1}{2} * \frac{1}{2} = \frac{1}{4}$$ Both methods yield the same maximum value of \(\frac{1}{4}\) at the point \((\frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{2})\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Show that if/ \(\left(\mathrm{x}_{1} ; \mathrm{x}_{2}\right)\) is a concave function, it is also a quasi-concave function. Do this by comparing Equation 2.107 (defining quasi-concavity) to Equation 2.88 (denning concavity). Can you give an intuitive reason for this result? Is the converse of the statement true? Are quas?concave functions necessarily concave?

The height of a ball \(t\) seconds after it is thrown straight up is \(-^{1} A g t^{2}+401\) (where \(g\) is the acceleration due to gravity a. If \(g=32\) (as on the earth), when does the ball reach a maximum height? What is that height? b. If \(g=5.5\) (as on the moon), when does the ball reach a maximum height and what is that height? Can you explain the reasons for the difference between this answer and the answer for part (a)? c. In general, develop an expression for the change in maximum height for a unit change in \(g .\) Explain why this value depends implicitly on the value of \(g\) itself.

One of the most important functions we will encounter in this book is the Cobb-Douglas function: \\[ y=(x \\] where a and \(P\) are positive constants that are each less than one. a. Show that this function is quasi-concave using a "brute force" method by applying Equation 2.107 b. Show that the Cobb-Douglas function is quasi-concave by showing that the any contour line of the form \(y=c\) (where \(c\) is any positive constant) is convex and therefore that the set of points for which \(y>c\) is a convex set. c. Show that if \(a+y 8>1\) then the Cobb-Douglas function is not concave (thereby illus trating that not all quasi-concave functions are concave). (Note: The Cobb-Douglas function is discussed further in the Extensions to this chapter.)

Suppose a firm's total revenues depend on the amount produced ( \(q\) ) according to the function \\[ T R=70 q-q | \\] Total costs also depend on \(q\) \\[ T C=q^{2}+30 q+100 \\] a. What level of output should the firm produce in order to maximize profits \((77 ?-T C) ?\) What will profits be? b. Show that the second-order conditions for a maximum are satisfied at the output level found in part (a). c. Does the solution calculated here obey the "marginal revenue equals marginal cost" rule? Explain.

Another function we will encounter often in this book is the "power function" \\[ y=x^{5} \\] where \(0^{\wedge} 5^{\wedge} 1\) (at times we will also examine this function for cases where 5 can be negative too, in which case we will use the form \(y-x^{5} / 8\) to ensure that the derivatives have the proper sign) a. Show that this function is concave (and therefore also, by the result of problem 2.8 , quasi-concave). Notice that the \(8=1\) is a special case and that the function is "strictly" concave only for \(8<1\) b. Show that the multivariate form of the power function is also concave (and quasi-concave). Explain why, in this case, the fact that/ \(_{12}=f_{i}>i-0\) makes the determination of concavity especially simple. One way to incorporate "scale" effects into the function described in part b is to use the monotonic transformation \\[ \left.g i_{x l,} x_{2}\right)=y i=\left[(x,)^{s}+\left(x_{2}\right)^{s}\right] y \\] where \(y\) is a positive constant. Does this transformation preserve the concavity of the function? Is \(g\) quasi-concave?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free