The town of Podunk has decided to provide security services to its residents by hiring workers \((L)\) and guard dogs \((D) .\) Security services \((S)\) are produced according to the production function \\[ s=V_{L D} \\] and residents of the town wish to consume 10 units of such services per period. a. Suppose that \(L\) and \(D\) both rent for \(\$ 1\) per period. How much of each input should the town hire to produce the desired services at minimal cost? What will that cost be? b. Suppose now that Podunk is the only hirer of people who work with guard dogs and that the supply curve for such workers is given by \\[ L=10 z v \\] where \(w\) is the per-period wage of guard dog handlers. If dogs continue to rent for \$1 per period, how much of each input should the town hire to produce the desired services at minimal cost? What will those costs be? What will the wage rate of dog handlers be?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: To provide the required security services at minimal cost when labor supply is determined by a given curve and both inputs cost $1 per period, the town should hire 100 workers and 1/20 guard dogs. The wage rate of dog handlers will be $10, and the total cost will be $100 + 1/20.

Step by step solution

01

Part a: Optimal inputs when both L and D cost $1 per period

1. Write the production function and constraints: We have the production function \(s = V_{LD}\), and the constraint is that the residents want to consume 10 units of security services per period, which means \(s = 10\). 2. Substitute the constraint into the production function: Replacing \(s = 10\), we get \(10 = V_{LD}\), or \(V = \frac{10}{LD}\). 3. Set up the cost function: As both labor and guard dogs cost \(1 per period, the total cost function is given by \)C(L,D) = L + D$. 4. Minimize the cost function: We need to minimize the cost function \(C(L,D)\) subject to constraint \(V = \frac{10}{LD}\). To do that, we can use the method of Lagrange multipliers. Let's set up the Lagrangian function: \(\mathcal{L}(L, D, \lambda) = L + D + \lambda(\frac{10}{LD} - V)\). 5. Differentiate the Lagrangian function with respect to L, D, and λ: \\[\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial L} = 1 - \frac{10\lambda}{D^2} = 0\\] \\[\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial D} = 1 - \frac{10\lambda}{L^2} = 0\\] \\[\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \lambda} = \frac{10}{LD} - V = 0\\] 6. Solve the system of equations: From the first and second equation, we get: \\[\frac{10\lambda}{D^2} = \frac{10\lambda}{L^2}\\] And since \(0\ne \lambda\), we can cancel out the \(10\lambda\) term to get: \\[D^2 = L^2\\] Therefore, \(D = L\). Substituting this back into the third equation, we get: \\[\frac{10}{L^2} = V\\] Then \(L^2 = 5\). Thus, \(L = \sqrt{5}\) and \(D = \sqrt{5}\). 7. Calculate the minimum cost: The minimal cost is given by \(C(\sqrt{5}, \sqrt{5}) = \sqrt{5} + \sqrt{5} = 2\sqrt{5}\). So, to produce the desired services at minimal cost, the town should hire \(\sqrt{5}\) workers and \(\sqrt{5}\) guard dogs, and the cost will be \(2\sqrt{5}\).
02

Part b: Optimal inputs when L is determined by the supply curve

1. Write the labor supply function: The labor supply function is given as \(L = 10w\) where w is the wage per period for guard dog handlers. 2. Write the cost function with the new labor supply constraint: Now the cost function becomes \(C(w, D) = 10w + D\). 3. Substitute the labor supply function into the constraint on the production function: Replacing \(L = 10w\) in the constraint \(V = \frac{10}{LD}\), we obtain \(V = \frac{1}{wD}\). 4. Minimize the cost function using the Lagrange multipliers method: We set up the Lagrangian function: \(\mathcal{L}(w, D, \lambda) = 10w + D + \lambda(\frac{1}{wD} - V)\). 5. Differentiate the Lagrangian function with respect to w, D, and λ: \\[\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial w} = 10 - \frac{\lambda}{w^2D} = 0\\] \\[\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial D} = 1 - \frac{\lambda}{wD^2} = 0\\] \\[\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \lambda} = \frac{1}{wD} - V = 0\\] 6. Solve the system of equations: From the first and second equation, we get: \\[\frac{\lambda}{w^2D} = 10\frac{\lambda}{wD^2}\\] And since \(0\ne \lambda\), we can simplify and get: \\[wD = 10D\\] Then, \(w = 10\). Substituting this back into the third equation, we get: \\[V = \frac{1}{wD} = \frac{1}{10D}\\] 7. Determine the inputs to produce the desired services at minimal cost: Since \(w = 10\), we can use the labor supply function to find \(L = 10w = 100\). Then, we use the constraint to find \(D\). We have \(V = \frac{1}{10D}\), so \(D = \frac{1}{10V}\). Plug in the value of V from part a, \(V = \frac{10}{(\sqrt{5})^2} = 2\), we get \(D = \frac{1}{20}\). 8. Calculate the total costs and per-period wage of dog handlers: The total cost is \(C(w, D) = 10w + D = 10\cdot10 + \frac{1}{20} = 100 + \frac{1}{20}\). The per-period wage of dog handlers is \(w = 10\). In order to produce the desired services at minimal cost when labor supply is determined by the given curve, the town should hire 100 workers and \(\frac{1}{20}\) guard dogs. The wage rate of dog handlers will be \(10, and the total cost will be \)100 + \frac{1}{20}$.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose there are a fixed number of 1,000 identical firms in the perfectly competitive concrete pipe industry. Each firm produces the same fraction of total market output, and each firm's production function for pipe is given by \\[ q=V K L \\] Suppose also that the market demand for concrete pipe is given by \\[ Q=400,000-100,000 P \\] where Qis total concrete pipe. a. If \(w=v=\$ 1,\) in what ratio will the typical firm use 2 fand \(L ?\) What will be the long-run average and marginal cost of pipe? b. In long-run equilibrium what will be the market equilibrium price and quantity for con crete pipe? How much will each firm produce? How much labor will be hired by each firm and in the market as a whole? c. Suppose the market wage, \(w,\) rose to \(\$ 2\) while \(v\) remained constant at \(\$ 1 .\) How will this change the capital-labor ratio for the typical firm, and how will it affect its marginal costs? d. Under the conditions of part (c), what will the long-run market equilibrium be? How much labor will now be hired by the concrete pipe industry? e. How much of the change in total labor demand from part (b) to part (d) represented the substitution effect resulting from the change in wage and how much represented the output effect?

In the early 1960 s President John Kennedy's Council of Economic Advisers recommended the institution of "Wage-Price Guideposts." The basic idea of the guideposts was to require wages in all industries to increase at the rate at which the national level of output per worker increases (about 3.2 percent per year). Some industries would have had rates of productivity increase of less than 3.2 percent. These industries were to be permitted to increase prices to the extent that their productivity increase fell short of the national average. On the other hand, firms that had productivity increases in excess of the national average were expected to reduce their prices to the extent of this excess. Adherence to these rules was intended to keep prices constant on a nationwide basis. There were numerous exceptions to these general principles, but assume for the purposes of this problem that these were not important. Assuming the Wage-Price Guideposts were legislated as an unbreakable law, answer the following questions: a. What would happen to the relative factor shares in each industry over time? b. What does this implicitly assume about the elasticity of substitution in all industries? c. What effect would this legislation have on the investment of new capital if industries did not obey the assumption discussed in part (b)? d. In regard to your answer to part (c), what effects do you think the guideposts would have on economic growth?

The mowing of lawns requires only labor (gardeners) and capital (lawn mowers). These factors must be used in the fixed proportions of one worker to one lawn mower, and production exhibits constant returns to scale. Suppose the wage rate of gardeners is \(\$ 2\) per hour, lawn mowers rent for \(\$ 5\) per hour, and the price elasticity of demand for mowed lawns is -2 a. What is the wage elasticity of demand for gardeners (that is, what is \(d L / d w \cdot w / L\) )? b. What is the elasticity of demand for lawn mowers with respect to their rental rate (that is, \(d K / S v v / K)\) c. What is the cross elasticity of demand for lawn mowers with respect to the wage rate (that \(\text { is, }d K / d w w / K)\\}\)

Assume the quantity of envelopes licked per hour by Sticky Gums, Inc., is \(Q=10,000 \mathrm{vZ}\) where \(L\) is the number of laborers hired per hour by the firm. Assume further that the envelope-licking business is perfectly competitive with a market price of \(\$ .01\) per envelope. a. How much labor would be hired at a competitive wage of \(\$ 10 ? \$ 5 ? \$ 2 ?\) Use your results to sketch a demand curve for labor. b. Assume that Sticky Gums hires its labor at an hourly wage of \(\$ 10 .\) What quantity of en velopes will be licked when the price of a licked envelope is \(\$ .10, \$ .05, \$ .02 ?\) Use your re sults to sketch a supply curve for licked envelopes.

Suppose demand for labor is given by \\[ L=-50 w+450 \\] and supply is given by \\[ L=100 w \\] where \(L\) represents the number of people employed and \(w\) is the real wage rate per hour. a. What will be the equilibrium levels for \(w\) and \(L\) in this market? b. Suppose the government wishes to raise the equilibrium wage to \(\$ 4\) per hour by offering a subsidy to employers for each person hired. How much will this subsidy have to be? What will the new equilibrium level of employment be? How much total subsidy will be paid? c. Suppose instead that the government declared a minimum wage of \(\$ 4\) per hour. How much labor would be demanded at this price? How much unemployment would there be? d. Graph your results.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free