Two goods have independent marginal utilities if \\[ \frac{d t U}{d Y d X} \quad \frac{d^{2} U}{d X d Y}=0 \\] Show that if we assume diminishing marginal utility for each good, then any utility function with independent marginal utilities will have a diminishing \(M R S\). Provide an example to show that the converse of this statement is not true. 3.10 a. Show that the CES function \\[ \begin{array}{c} x^{3} \\ 0 \end{array}+* \frac{Y}{T} \\] is homothetic. How does the \(M R S\) depend on the ratio \(\mathrm{F} / \mathrm{X}\) ? b. Show that your results from part (a) agree with Example 3.3 for the case \(6=1\) (perfect substitutes \()\) and \(5=0\) (Cobb-Douglas). c. Show that the \(M R S\) is strictly diminishing for all values of \(8<1\) d. Show that if \(X=Y\), the \(M R S\) for this function depends only on the relative sizes of a and j8. e. Calculate the \(M R S\) for this function when \(Y / X=.9\) and \(Y / X=1.1\) for the two cases \(8=5\) and \(8=-1 .\) What do you conclude about the extent to which the \(M R S\) changes in the vicinity of \(\mathrm{X}=\mathrm{F} ?\) How would you interpret this geometrically?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Question: Explain the relationship between diminishing marginal utility and diminishing MRS, and provide an example showing the converse of the statement is not always true. Answer: Diminishing marginal utility implies that the additional satisfaction derived from consuming more of a good decreases as consumption increases. When the marginal utilities of two goods are independent, diminishing marginal utility results in a diminishing MRS - the rate at which a consumer is willing to substitute one good for another. Specifically, if the second derivative of MRS is positive, this implies diminishing MRS. However, the converse of the statement is not always true. An example can be seen in the utility function U(X, Y) = X^2 + Y^2, where the MRS is diminishing, but the marginal utilities are not independent.

Step by step solution

01

Diminishing marginal utility relationship to MRS

Starting from the given condition of independent marginal utilities: \[ \frac{d t U}{d Y d X} \frac{d^{2} U}{d X d Y}=0 \] Let's denote marginal utilities as: \[ MU_X = \frac{dU}{dX}, MU_Y = \frac{dU}{dY} \] Then, according to the condition above, we can rewrite it as: \[ \frac{dMU_Y}{dX} MU_X = 0 \] Diminishing marginal utility implies \( \frac{dMU_X}{dX} < 0 \) and \( \frac{dMU_Y}{dY} < 0 \) We can find the MRS as follows: \[ MRS = \frac{MU_X}{MU_Y} \] Now, we need to find the second derivative of MRS with respect to X and show that it is positive, which implies diminishing MRS: \[ \frac{d MRS}{dX} = \frac{\frac{dMU_X}{dX} \cdot MU_Y - MU_X\frac{dMU_Y}{dX}}{(MU_Y)^2} \] Given that independent marginal utilities condition: \(\frac{dMU_Y}{dX} = MU_X = 0\), we have: \[ \frac{d MRS}{dX} = \frac{\frac{dMU_X}{dX} \cdot MU_Y}{(MU_Y)^2} \] Now, we find the second derivative of MRS with respect to X: \[ \frac{d^2 MRS}{dX^2} = \frac{(\frac{d^2MU_X}{dX^2} \cdot MU_Y) \cdot (MU_Y)^2 - (\frac{dMU_X}{dX} \cdot MU_Y)^2}{(MU_Y)^4} \] Since diminishing marginal utility for X implies that \(\frac{dMU_X}{dX} < 0\) and \(\frac{d^2MU_X}{dX^2} \geq 0\), we can conclude that \(\frac{d^2 MRS}{dX^2} \geq 0\). Therefore, the MRS will be diminishing, proving the initial claim. 2. Converse of the statement not true (example)
02

Example of converse statement not being true

Consider the following utility function: \[ U(X, Y) = X^2 + Y^2 \] Marginal utilities are: \[ MU_X = \frac{dU}{dX} = 2X, \ MU_Y = \frac{dU}{dY} = 2Y \] And MRS is: \[ MRS = \frac{MU_X}{MU_Y} = \frac{2X}{2Y} = \frac{X}{Y} \] Now we'll show that it has diminishing MRS, but doesn't have independent marginal utilities. First, let's find the second derivative of MRS with respect to X: \[ \frac{d^2 MRS}{dX^2} = \frac{d}{dX} \left( \frac{Y}{X^2} \right) = -\frac{2Y}{X^3} < 0 \] Since \(\frac{d^2 MRS}{dX^2} < 0\), the MRS is diminishing. However, the marginal utilities are not independent: \[ \frac{dMU_Y}{dX} = \frac{d(2Y)}{dX} = 0, \ \frac{dMU_X}{dY} = \frac{d(2X)}{dY} = 0 \] \[ \frac{dMU_Y}{dX} \cdot \frac{dMU_X}{dY} = 0 \cdot 0 \neq 0 \] This counterexample shows that the converse of the statement is not true, as even if MRS is diminishing, the marginal utilities might not be independent.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Georgia always eats hot dogs in a bun together with 1 oz. of mustard. Each hot dog eaten in this way provides 15 units of utility, but any other combination of hot dogs, buns, and mustard is worthless to Georgia. a. Explain the nature of Georgia's utility function and indicate the form of her indifference curve map. b. Suppose hot dogs cost \(\$ 1,\) buns cost \(\$ .40,\) and mustard costs \(\$ .10\) per ounce. Show how Georgia's utility can be represented by the total amount of money she spends on these three items. c. How would your answer to part (b) change if the price of hot dogs rose to \(\$ 1.50 ?\)

Consider the following utility functions: a. \(U(X, Y)=X Y\) b. \(U(X, Y)=X^{2} Y^{2}\) \(c \quad U(X, Y)=\ln X+\operatorname{In} Y\) Show that each of these has a diminishing \(M R S\), but that they exhibit constant, increasing, and decreasing marginal utility, respectively. What do you conclude?

Laidback Al derives utility from 3 goods; music (M), wine \((W)\), and cheese (C). His utility function is of the simple linear form \\[ \text { utility }=\boldsymbol{U}(\boldsymbol{M}, \boldsymbol{W}, \boldsymbol{C})=\boldsymbol{M}+2 \boldsymbol{W}+\mathbf{3} \mathbf{C} \\] a. Assuming Al's consumption of music is fixed at \(10,\) determine the equations for the in difference curves for Wand Cfor \(U=40\) and \(U-70 .\) Sketch these curves. b. Show that Al's \(M R S\) of wine for cheese is constant for all values of Wand \(C\) on the indif ference curves calculated in part (a). c. Suppose Al's consumption of music increases to 20 . How would this change your answers to parts (a) and (b)? Explain your results intuitively.

Example 3.3 shows that the MRS for the Cobb-Douglas function \\[ U(X, Y)=X^{n} Y^{\wedge} \\] is given by \\[ M R S=_{P}^{\wedge}(Y / X) \\] a Does this result depend on whether \(a+(3=1 ?\) Does this sum have any relevance to the theory of choice? b. For commodity bundles for which \(Y=\mathrm{X}\), how does the \(M R S\) depend on the values of \(a\) and \(/ 3 ?\) Develop an intuitive explanation of why if \(a>(3, M R S>1\). Illustrate your argument with a graph. c. Suppose an individual obtains utility only from amounts of Xand Fthat exceed minimal subsistence levels given by \(\mathrm{X}_{c}, \mathrm{F}_{\mathrm{o} .}\) In this case, \(U(X, Y)=(X-X o)^{\circ}\left(Y-Y_{o}\right) e .\) Is this function homothetic? (For a further discussion, see the extensions to Chapter \(4 .)\)

Graph a typical indifference curve for the following utility functions and determine whether they have convex indifference curves (that is, whether they obey the assumption of a diminishing \(M R S\) ): a. \(U=3 X+Y\) b. \(\quad U=\mathrm{VX}-Y\) \(\mathrm{c} \quad U=\mathrm{VX}^{2}+\mathrm{P}\) d. \(U=\mathrm{VX}^{2}-\mathrm{Y}^{2}\) \(\mathbf{e}, \quad U=\mathbf{X}^{23} \mathbf{F}^{13}\) \(\mathrm{f}, \quad U=\log \mathrm{X}+\log Y\).

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free