Hicks's "second law" of demand states that the predominant relationship among goods is net substitutability (see footnote 3 of Chapter 6 ). To prove this result: a. Show why compensated demand functions $$X ;=h,\left(P_{U} \ldots, P_{n}, V\right)$$ are homogeneous of degree zero in \(P_{x} \ldots P_{n}\) for a given level of \(V\) b. Use Euler's theorem for homogeneous functions (for a statement of this theorem, see footnote 5 of Chapter 7 ) to show that \(=0 \text { (for all } i=1, n)\) c. Use the "first law of demand" to conclude that is, net substitution must prevail, on average.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: Hicks's second law of demand states that the predominant relationship among goods is net substitutability. To prove it, we follow three steps: (1) show that compensated demand functions are homogeneous of degree zero in prices and expenditure, (2) apply Euler's theorem for homogeneous functions to the compensated demand functions, and (3) use the first law of demand to conclude that net substitution must prevail on average.

Step by step solution

01

Show That Compensated Demand Functions are Homogeneous of Degree Zero

To prove that compensated demand functions \(X_i=h_i(P_x,\ldots,P_n,V)\) are homogeneous of degree zero, we need to show that for any \(\lambda > 0\), $$h_i(\lambda P_x, \ldots, \lambda P_n, \lambda V) = h_i(P_x, \ldots, P_n, V).$$ Since the demand function is compensated, the consumer's utility \(U\) is constant, and we have: $$U=h^{-1}(P_x,\ldots,P_n,V).$$ Now, let's analyze the effect of scaling all prices and expenditure by a factor \(\lambda\), that is, computing the utility when all prices and expenditure are multiplied by \(\lambda\): $$U=h^{-1}(\lambda P_x, \ldots, \lambda P_n, \lambda V).$$ Since the consumer's utility does not change (\(U\) is constant), we have: $$h^{-1}(P_x, \ldots, P_n, V)=h^{-1}(\lambda P_x, \ldots, \lambda P_n, \lambda V).$$ Taking the inverse of both sides, we obtain: $$h_i(\lambda P_x, \ldots, \lambda P_n, \lambda V) = h_i(P_x, \ldots, P_n, V).$$ Therefore, the compensated demand functions are homogeneous of degree zero.
02

Apply Euler's Theorem to the Compensated Demand Functions

Euler's theorem for homogeneous functions states that, for a homogeneous function \(g\) of degree \(k\), we have: $$\sum_{i=1}^n x_i\frac{\partial g}{\partial x_i} = kg(x_1, \ldots, x_n).$$ Since the compensated demand functions \(h_i\) are homogeneous of degree zero, we can apply Euler's theorem with \(k=0\), and sum over all goods \(i = 1,\ldots, n\). For each \(i\), we will compute the partial derivative of \(h_i\) with respect to expenditure \(V\) and multiply it by the corresponding price \(P_i\): $$\sum_{i=1}^n P_i\frac{\partial h_i}{\partial V} = 0.$$
03

Use the First Law of Demand to Conclude Net Substitution Must Prevail

The first law of demand states that, as the price of a good increases, the quantity demanded of that good decreases, holding utility constant. By applying the first law of demand to the expression from step 2, we can conclude that net substitution must prevail on average. If we increase the price of one good in the set, the first law of demand implies that the quantity demanded of that specific good will decrease, while the quantities demanded of the remaining goods will increase, maintaining the overall expenditure constant. To sum up, we have proven that the compensated demand functions are homogeneous of degree zero, and we have used Euler's theorem and the first law of demand to show that net substitution must prevail in these functions on average, proving Hicks's second law of demand.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Example 6.3 computes the demand functions implied by the three-good CES utility function a. Use the demand function for Xin Equation 6.28 to determine whether Xand For Xand Z are gross substitutes or gross complements. b. How would you determine whether \(X\) and \(Y\) or \(X\) and \(Z\) are net substitutes or net complements?

A utility function is termed separable if it can be written as \\[\left.U(X, Y)=U^{\wedge} X\right)+U_{2}(Y)\\] where \(U \backslash>0, U^{\prime \prime}<0,\) and \(U_{u} U_{2}\) need not be the same function. a. What does separability assume about the cross partial derivative \(U_{X Y} ?\) Give an intuitive discussion of what word this condition means and in what situations it might be plausible. b. Show that if utility is separable, neither good can be inferior. c. Does the assumption of separability allow you to conclude definitively whether \(X\) and \(Y\) are gross substitutes or gross complements? Explain. d. Use the Cobb-Douglas utility function to show that separability is not invariant with respect to monotonic transformations. Note: Separable functions are examined in more detail in the Extensions to this chapter.

Hard Times Burt buys only rotgut whiskey and jelly donuts to sustain him. For Burt, rotgut whiskey is an inferior good that exhibits Giffen's paradox, although rotgut whiskey and jelly donuts are Hicksian substitutes in the customary sense. Develop an intuitive explanation to suggest why a rise in the price of rotgut must cause fewer jelly donuts to be bought. That is, the goods must also be gross complements.

Suppose that an individual consumes three goods, \(X_{u} X_{2},\) and \(X_{3},\) and that \(X_{2}\) and \(X_{3}\) are similar commodities (i.e., cheap and expensive restaurant meals) with \(P_{2}=\mathrm{KP}_{3}\) where \(K<1-\) that is, the goods' prices have a constant relationship to one another. a. Show that \(\mathrm{X}_{2}\) and \(\mathrm{X}_{3}\) can be treated as a composite commodity. b. Suppose both \(\mathrm{X}_{2}\) and \(\mathrm{X}_{3}\) are subject to a transaction cost of \(t\) per unit (for some exam ples, see Problem 6.6 ). How will this transaction cost affect the price of \(X_{2}\) relative to that of \(\mathrm{X}_{3} ?\) How will this effect vary with the value of \(t ?\) c. Can you predict how an income-compensated increase in \(t\) will affect expenditures on the composite commodity \(\mathrm{X}_{2}\) and \(\mathrm{X}_{3} ?\) Does the composite commodity theorem strictly apply to this case? d. How will an income-compensated increase in \(t\) affect how total spending on the com posite commodity is allocated between \(X_{2}\) and \(X_{3} ?\) (For a further discussion of the complications involved in this problem, see \(T . E\) Borcherding and E. Silberberg, "Shipping the Good Apples Out: The Alchian- Allen Theorem Reconsidered," Journal ofPolitical Economy [February 1978]: 131-138.)

Ms. Sarah Traveler does not own a car and travels only by bus, train, or plane. Her utility function is given by $$\text { utility }=\boldsymbol{B}-\boldsymbol{T}^{\prime} \boldsymbol{P}$$ where each letter stands for miles traveled by a specific mode. Suppose that the ratio of the price of train travel to that of bus travel \(\left(P, / P_{B}\right)\) never changes. a. How might one define a composite commodity for ground transportation? b. Phrase Sarah's optimization problem as one of choosing between ground (G) and air (P) transportation. c. What are Sarah's demand functions for Gand P? d. Once Sarah decides how much to spend on \(G\), how will she allocate those expenditures between \(B\) and \(7 ?\)

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free