The mowing of lawns requires only labor (gardeners) and capital (lawn mowers). These factors must be used in the fixed proportions of one worker to one lawn mower, and production exhibits constant returns to scale. Suppose the wage rate of gardeners is \(\$ 2\) per hour, lawn mowers rent for \(\$ 5\) per hour, and the price elasticity of demand for mowed lawns is -2 a. What is the wage elasticity of demand for gardeners (that is, what is \(\partial L / \partial w \cdot w / L\) )? b. What is the elasticity of demand for lawn mowers with respect to their rental rate (that is, \(\partial K / \partial v \cdot v / K) ?\) c. What is the cross elasticity of demand for lawn mowers with respect to the wage rate (that is \(, \partial K / \partial w \cdot w / K) ?\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The wage elasticity of demand for gardeners is -2, the elasticity of demand for lawn mowers with respect to their rental rate is -2, and the cross elasticity of demand for lawn mowers with respect to the wage rate is 0.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the production function

In this problem, the production function is fixed, with one worker (gardener) and one lawn mower required for each unit of output. This means the output can be represented as Q = min(L, K), where L is the number of workers and K is the number of lawn mowers.
02

Calculate the price elasticity of demand for gardeners

We are given the price elasticity of demand for mowed lawns: \(\varepsilon_p = -2\). Since there is a fixed proportion between the labor and capital and the production function exhibits constant returns to scale, we can assume that the elasticity of demand for gardeners and lawn mowers is the same: \(\varepsilon_L = \varepsilon_p = -2\).
03

Calculate the wage elasticity of demand for gardeners

The wage elasticity of demand for gardeners is defined as \(\partial L / \partial w \cdot w / L\). Using the result from Step 2, we can calculate this as follows: Wage elasticity of demand for gardeners = \(\varepsilon_L = \frac{\partial L}{\partial w} \cdot \frac{w}{L} = -2\) This means that for every 1% increase in the wage rate of a gardener, the demand for gardeners will decrease by 2%.
04

Calculate the elasticity of demand for lawn mowers with respect to their rental rate

We need to find the elasticity of demand for lawn mowers with respect to their rental rate: \(\partial K / \partial v \cdot v / K\). Using the information from Step 1, we can see that elasticity of demand for lawn mowers is also -2 (since they are used in fixed proportions with constant returns to scale): \(\varepsilon_K = \frac{\partial K}{\partial v} \cdot \frac{v}{K} = -2\) This means that for a 1% increase in the rental rate of lawn mowers, the demand for lawn mowers will decrease by 2%.
05

Calculate the cross elasticity of demand for lawn mowers with respect to the wage rate

We need to find the cross elasticity of demand for lawn mowers with respect to the wage rate: \( \partial K / \partial w \cdot w / K\). Here, we already know that the elasticity of demand for gardeners and lawn mowers is the same, since they are used in fixed proportions and the production function exhibits constant returns to scale. Thus, the cross elasticity of demand for lawn mowers with respect to the wage rate is: \(\varepsilon_{K,w} = \frac{\partial K}{\partial w} \cdot \frac{w}{K} = 0\) This means that when the wage rate of gardeners changes, the demand for lawn mowers remains unchanged. In summary: a. The wage elasticity of demand for gardeners is -2. b. The elasticity of demand for lawn mowers with respect to their rental rate is -2. c. The cross elasticity of demand for lawn mowers with respect to the wage rate is 0.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Assume the quantity of envelopes licked per hour by Sticky Gums, Inc., is \(Q=10,000 \sqrt{L}\) where \(L\) is the number of laborers hired per hour by the firm. Assume further that the envelope-licking business is perfectly competitive with a market price of \(\$ .01\) per envelope. a. How much labor would be hired at a competitive wage of \(\$ 10\) ? \(\$ 5\) ? \(\$ 2\) ? Use your results to sketch a demand curve for labor. b. Assume that Sticky Gums hires its labor at an hourly wage of \(\$ 10 .\) What quantity of envelopes will be licked when the price of a licked envelope is \(\$ .10, \$ .05, \$ .02 ?\) Use your results to sketch a supply curve for licked envelopes.

Carl the clothier owns a large garment factory on an isolated island. Carl's factory is the only source of employment for most of the islanders, and thus Carl acts as a monopsonist. The supply curve for garment workers is given by \\[ L=80 w \\] where \(L\) is the number of workers hired and \(w\) is their hourly wage. Assume also that Carl's labor demand (marginal revenue product) curve is given by \\[ L=400-40 M R P_{L} \\] a. How many workers will Carl hire to maximize his profits and what wage will he pay? b. Assume now that the government implements a minimum wage law covering all garment workers. How many workers will Carl now hire and how much unemployment will there be if the minimum wage is set at \(\$ 4\) per hour? c. Graph your results. d. How does a minimum wage imposed under monopsony differ in results as compared with a minimum wage imposed under perfect competition (assuming the minimum wage is above the market-determined wage)?

Assume that the market for rental cars (used for business purposes) is perfectly competitive with the demand for this capital input given by \\[ K=1,500-25 v \\] and the supply given by \\[ K=75 v-500 \\] where \(K\) represents the number of cars rented by firms and \(v\) is the rental rate per day. a. What will be the equilibrium levels for \(v\) and \(K\) in this market? b. Suppose that following an oil embargo gas prices rise dramatically so that now business firms must take account of gas prices in their car rental decisions. Their demand for rental cars is now given by \\[ K=1,700-25 v-300 g \\] where \(g\) is the per-gallon price of gasoline. What will be the equilibrium levels for \(v\) and \(K\) if \(g=\$ 2 ?\) If \(g=\$ 3 ?\) c. Graph your results. d. Because the oil embargo brought about decreased demand for rental cars, what might be the implication for other capital input markets as a result? For example, employees may still need transportation, so how might the demand for mass transit be affected? Because businesspeople also rent cars to attend meetings, what might happen in the market for phone equipment as employees drive less and use the phone more? Can you think of any other factor input markets that might be affected?

The town of Podunk has decided to provide security services to its residents by hiring workers \((L)\) and guard dogs \((D) .\) Security services \((S)\) are produced according to the production function \\[ S=\sqrt{L D} \\] and residents of the town wish to consume 10 units of such services per period. a. Suppose that \(L\) and \(D\) both rent for \(\$ 1\) per period. How much of each input should the town hire to produce the desired services at minimal cost? What will that cost be? b. Suppose now that Podunk is the only hirer of people who work with guard dogs and that the supply curve for such workers is given by \\[ \boldsymbol{L}=\mathbf{1} 0 w \\] where \(w\) is the per-period wage of guard dog handlers. If dogs continue to rent for \(\$ 1\) per period, how much of each input should the town hire to produce the desired services at minimal cost? What will those costs be? What will the wage rate of dog handlers be?

Suppose there are a fixed number of 1,000 identical firms in the perfectly competitive concrete pipe industry. Each firm produces the same fraction of total market output, and each firm's production function for pipe is given by \\[ q=\sqrt{K L} \\] Suppose also that the market demand for concrete pipe is given by \\[ Q=400,000-100,000 P \\] where \(Q\) is total concrete pipe. a. If \(w=v=\$ 1,\) in what ratio will the typical firm use \(K\) and \(L\) ? What will be the long-run average and marginal cost of pipe? b. In long-run equilibrium what will be the market equilibrium price and quantity for concrete pipe? How much will each firm produce? How much labor will be hired by each firm and in the market as a whole? c. Suppose the market wage, \(w\), rose to \(\$ 2\) while \(v\) remained constant at \(\$ 1 .\) How will this change the capital-labor ratio for the typical firm, and how will it affect its marginal costs? d. Under the conditions of part (c), what will the long-run market equilibrium be? How much labor will now be hired by the concrete pipe industry? e. How much of the change in total labor demand from part (b) to part (d) represented the substitution effect resulting from the change in wage and how much represented the output effect?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free