Who made this statement: "I still have the audacity to believe that people everywhere can have three meals a day." (LO4, 8) a) Charles Murray b) William Julius Wilson c) Barbara Bush (mother of President George W. Bush) d) Martin Luther King Jr. e) Lisbeth B. Schorr

Short Answer

Expert verified
d) Martin Luther King Jr.

Step by step solution

01

Read the statement

Read and understand the given statement: "I still have the audacity to believe that people everywhere can have three meals a day."
02

Review the list of possible authors

Go through the list of potential individuals who could have made the statement: a) Charles Murray b) William Julius Wilson c) Barbara Bush (mother of President George W. Bush) d) Martin Luther King Jr. e) Lisbeth B. Schorr
03

Identify the author of the statement

Recall important speeches, writings, or historical events involving each of these individuals. In this case, the statement "I still have the audacity to believe that people everywhere can have three meals a day." is famously attributed to Martin Luther King Jr., who made this statement during his Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech.
04

Final answer

Based on the analysis, the answer to this question is: d) Martin Luther King Jr.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Martin Luther King Jr.
Martin Luther King Jr. is renowned as a pivotal figure in the American civil rights movement, championing the fight against racial segregation and inequality through nonviolent protest and stirring oratory. His legacy encompasses not only his efforts in civil rights but also his strong stance on economic rights and justice.

After receiving the Nobel Peace Prize in 1964, King didn't rest on his laurels; instead, he broadened his focus to include global issues like poverty and economic inequality. He believed strongly in a universal standard of living, famously expressing in his Nobel acceptance speech his 'audacity to believe that people everywhere can have three meals a day,' highlighting his vision for economic justice worldwide.

King's statements and actions provided both a moral compass and a strategic framework for tackling economic disparities—a theme that is ever-present in current discussions around economic justice and equality.
Nobel Peace Prize
The Nobel Peace Prize stands as one of the most prestigious awards recognising individuals or groups for their outstanding contributions to peace. Established by the will of Alfred Nobel, the inventor of dynamite, it was first awarded in 1901 and seeks to honor acts of courage and determination in the pursuit of peace and conflict resolution.

Martin Luther King Jr. was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1964 in recognition of his nonviolent campaign against racism, becoming the youngest person at that time to receive this accolade. The Prize both acknowledges past achievements and encourages recipients in their ongoing work, capturing global attention and underscoring the importance of their efforts for social, political, and economic harmony.
Economic Justice
Economic justice extends the principles of fairness and equality to the economic sphere, concerning the distribution of wealth, opportunities, and privileges within a society. It encompasses a variety of concerns including poverty, wage inequity, and access to essential services and food.

Key to understanding economic justice is the acknowledgment that economic policies and systems have profound impacts on individual well-being and community stability. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. emphasized the importance of economic justice as an integral part of the civil rights movement, and his belief that all individuals should have access to essential resources such as food, a safe living environment, and healthcare. Economic justice seeks not only equal opportunity but also equitable outcomes for all members of society.
Problem-solving in Microeconomics
Problem-solving in microeconomics involves applying economic principles to understand how individuals and firms make decisions concerning the allocation of limited resources. In educational settings, this could involve case studies, theoretical questions, or real-world scenarios where students employ microeconomic concepts to analyze and propose solutions to economic issues.

Effective problem-solving requires a clear understanding of key concepts such as supply and demand, constraints, and trade-offs. Students often strengthen their problem-solving skills by examining various perspectives and potential outcomes, much like how one would examine historical figures like Martin Luther King Jr. to understand the impacts of economic policies on different segments of society. Skilled problem solvers in economics apply critical thinking to dissect complex problems and develop thoughtful, equitable solutions that aim at achieving economic justice.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Which statement is false? (LO5) a) Nearly half of all poor Americans own their own homes. b) A poor person today has roughly the same standard of living as a middle- income person 30 years ago. c) The reported consumption spending of people in the lowest income quintile is about twice their reported income. d) The standard of living of American's poor is comparable to that of most of the rest of the world's poor people.

An equal distribution of income would __________. (LO1) a) hurt both the work incentive and the incentive to save b) hurt neither the work incentive nor the incentive to save c) hurt the work incentive but not the incentive to save d) hurt the incentive to save but not the work incentive

Which one of the following has been the least effective antipoverty program __________? (LO6, 10) a) the Welfare Reform Act of 1996 b) Social Security c) food stamps d) the Earned Income Tax Credit

What would be the most effective way of raising people out of poverty? (LO9) a) Cut off welfare payments to every family with at least one adult member between the ages of 18 and 64 . b) Raise the minimum hourly wage. c) Eliminate the Earned Income Tax Credit. d) Have the government put welfare recipients to work at minimum wage jobs.

Which statement is the most accurate? (LO4,5) a) Although there are poor children in the United States, our child poverty problem is not nearly as bad as that of most other rich countries. b) The reason so many people in poor countries still don't have safe drinking water is that it would cost at least \(\$ 50\) billion a year to provide it. c) Poor people in the United States spend more than double their reported incomes. d) Although some war veterans are poor, virtually none are homeless because of the efforts of the Veterans Administration to find them housing.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free