Do you think the price elasticity of demand for Ford sport-utility vehicles (SUVs) will increase, decrease, or remain the same when each of the following events occurs? Explain your answer. a. Other car manufacturers, such as General Motors, decide to make and sell SUVs. b. SUVs produced in foreign countries are banned from the American market. c. Due to ad campaigns, Americans believe that SUVs are much safer than ordinary passenger cars. d. The time period over which you measure the elasticity lengthens. During that longer time, new models such as four-wheel-drive cargo vans appear.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The price elasticity of demand for Ford SUVs will: a) increase due to more competition, b) decrease if foreign SUVs are banned, c) decrease as a result of effective ad campaigns that emphasize safety, and d) increase over a longer time period due to the availability of more substitutes such as new models of vans.

Step by step solution

01

- Understanding Price Elasticity of Demand

Price elasticity of demand measures how sensitive the quantity demanded of a good is to a change in its price. It's calculated as the percentage change in quantity demanded divided by the percentage change in price. Elastic demand means the quantity demanded is highly responsive to changes in price, while inelastic demand means it's not very responsive.
02

- Analyzing the Impact of Competition on Elasticity

When other car manufacturers decide to make and sell SUVs, the market competition increases. Consumers have more substitutes to choose from if the price of Ford's SUVs rises, so they're more likely to switch to other brands. Therefore, the price elasticity of demand for Ford's SUVs would increase.
03

- Evaluating the Effect of Banning Foreign SUVs

If SUVs produced in foreign countries are banned from the American market, the number of available substitutes decreases. With fewer alternatives, consumers might be less sensitive to a price change of domestic SUVs, like those made by Ford. Thus, the price elasticity of demand for Ford's SUVs would decrease.
04

- Considering Perception Changes Due to Advertising

If ad campaigns successfully convince Americans that SUVs are much safer than ordinary passenger cars, the perceived value of SUVs increases. This could make consumers less price-sensitive as they prioritize safety over cost. Hence, in such a scenario, the price elasticity of demand for Ford's SUVs would likely decrease.
05

- Understanding Elasticity over an Extended Time Period

Over a longer time period, consumers have more time to adjust their behavior in response to price changes. They could switch to substitutes like four-wheel-drive cargo vans that appear in the market. This increased ability and time to adapt to price changes would cause price elasticity of demand for Ford's SUVs to increase.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Market Competition
In the context of price elasticity of demand, market competition plays a pivotal role in shaping how consumers react to price changes. When competition in the SUV market increases, as in the scenario where General Motors starts producing and selling their own SUVs, consumers are presented with a wider array of choices.

Increased competition often leads to a higher price elasticity of demand. This happens because consumers can easily find alternative products if they are not satisfied with the price of a particular brand's offering. If Ford's SUVs become too expensive, buyers might shift to competitors, thereby increasing Ford's price elasticity of demand. It is crucial for businesses to monitor their competitors' activities since their pricing strategies could significantly impact the demand for a company's products.
Substitute Goods
Substitute goods are products that can be used in place of each other. When substitutes for a product, like Ford's SUVs, are widely available and acceptable to consumers, the demand for the product becomes more elastic. In the case where foreign SUVs are banned, the range of substitute goods diminishes, which typically leads to a decrease in price elasticity.

Consumers, having limited choices, may be more willing to absorb price increases due to the lack of alternatives. This concept is crucial for understanding market dynamics, as the availability of substitute goods directly influences consumer behavior and pricing strategies.
Consumer Perception
Consumer perception significantly affects demand elasticity. If advertising campaigns convince the public that SUVs, such as those manufactured by Ford, are substantially safer than other vehicles, the perceived value of these SUVs rises. Safety becomes a selling point that may reduce sensitivity to price changes.

In this scenario, even if prices rise, demand may remain steady or even increase, leading to lower elasticity. This illustrates how the perceived benefits of a product, such as safety features, can outweigh cost considerations in the minds of consumers.
Supply and Demand
The basic economic principle of supply and demand is deeply intertwined with price elasticity. Prices tend to rise when demand exceeds supply and fall when supply exceeds demand. The price elasticity of demand is primarily concerned with how demand fluctuates in response to price changes.

If Ford SUVs are in high demand because of preference, brand loyalty, or perceived value, the company might be able to increase prices without significantly reducing the quantity demanded. Conversely, when there is plenty of supply and competitive alternatives, steep price increases might lead to a sharp decline in demand, signifying high price elasticity.
Time Period Effect
The elasticity of demand can change depending on the time frame being considered. Over a short period, consumers may not react significantly to a price change due to limited information or the urgency of their needs. However, over a longer period, consumers have the luxury of time to adjust to price changes, explore different alternatives, and make more informed decisions.

As new models and substitutes enter the market, like the four-wheel-drive cargo vans, consumers may shift their preferences, which tends to increase the elasticity of demand for the original product—in this case, Ford SUVs. The time period effect underscores the importance for businesses to anticipate long-term market trends and adjust their strategies accordingly.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What can you conclude about the price elasticity of demand in each of the following statements? a. "The pizza delivery business in this town is very competitive. I'd lose half my customers if I raised the price by as little as \(10 \%\)." b. "I owned both of the two Jerry Garcia autographed lithographs in existence. I sold one on eBay for a high price. But when I sold the second one, the price dropped by \(80 \%\)." c. "My economics professor has chosen to use the Krugman/Wells textbook for this class. I have no choice but to buy this book." d. "I always spend a total of exactly \(\$ 10\) per week on coffee."

The U.S. government is considering reducing the amount of carbon dioxide that firms are allowed to produce by issuing a limited number of tradable allowances for carbon dioxide \(\left(\mathrm{CO}_{2}\right)\) emissions. In an April 25 , 2007, report, the U.S. Congressional Budget Office \((\mathrm{CBO})\) argues that "most of the cost of meeting a cap on \(\mathrm{CO}_{2}\) emissions would be borne by consumers, who would face persistently higher prices for products such as electricity and gasoline \(\ldots\) poorer households would bear a larger burden relative to their income than wealthier households would." What assumption about one of the elasticities you learned about in this chapter has to be true for poorer households to be disproportionately affected?

Use an elasticity concept to explain each of the following observations. a. During economic booms, the number of new personal care businesses, such as gyms and tanning salons, is proportionately greater than the number of other new businesses, such as grocery stores. b. Cement is the primary building material in Mexico. After new technology makes cement cheaper to produce, the supply curve for the Mexican cement industry becomes relatively flatter. c. Some goods that were once considered luxuries, like a telephone, are now considered virtual necessities. As a result, the demand curve for telephone services has become steeper over time. d. Consumers in a less developed country like Guatemala spend proportionately more of their income on equipment for producing things at home, like sewing machines, than consumers in a more developed country like Canada.

Taiwan is a major world supplier of semiconductor chips. A recent earthquake severely damaged the production facilities of Taiwanese chip-producing companies, sharply reducing the amount of chips they could produce. a. Assume that the total revenue of a typical nonTaiwanese chip manufacturer rises due to these events. In terms of an elasticity, what must be true for this to happen? Illustrate the change in total revenue with a diagram, indicating the price effect and the quantity effect of the Taiwan earthquake on this company's total revenue. b. Now assume that the total revenue of a typical nonTaiwanese chip manufacturer falls due to these events. In terms of an elasticity, what must be true for this to happen? Illustrate the change in total revenue with a diagram, indicating the price effect and the quantity effect of the Taiwan earthquake on this company's total revenue.

In the United States, 2013 was a bad year for growing wheat. And as wheat supply decreased, the price of wheat rose dramatically, leading to a lower quantity demanded (a movement along the demand curve). The accompanying table describes what happened to prices and the quantity of wheat demanded. $$ \begin{array}{l|c|c} & 2012 & 2013 \\ \text { Quantity demanded (bushels) } & 2.2 \text { billion } & 2.0 \text { billion } \\ \text { Average price (per bushel) } & \$ 3.42 & \$ 4.26 \end{array} $$ a. Using the midpoint method, calculate the price elasticity of demand for winter wheat. b. What is the total revenue for U.S. wheat farmers in 2012 and \(2013 ?\) c. Did the bad harvest increase or decrease the total revenue of U.S. wheat farmers? How could you have predicted this from your answer to part a?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free