Suppose that BMW can produce any quantity of cars at a constant marginal cost equal to \(\$ 20,000\) and a fixed cost of \(\$ 10\) billion. You are asked to advise the CEO as to what prices and quantities BMW should set for sales in Europe and in the United States, The demand for BMWs in each market is given by $$Q_{E}=4,000,000-100 P_{E}$$ and $$Q_{u}=1,000,000-20 P_{\mathrm{U}}$$ where the subscript \(E\) denotes Europe, the subscript \(u\) denotes the United States. Assume that BMW can restrict U.S. sales to authorized BMW dealers only. a. What quantity of BMWs should the firm sell in each market, and what should the price be in each market? What should the total profit be? b. If \(\mathrm{BMW}\) were forced to charge the same price in each market, what would be the quantity sold in each market, the equilibrium price, and the company's profit?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The price and quantity for the cars sold in each market can be found by setting the marginal cost equal to the price and solving the demand equations. The total profit can be calculated by subtracting the total cost from the total revenue. This process is done separately for each market, and then with the assumption of BMW charging the same price in both markets.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the quantity to be sold in each market

For profit maximization, we need to set the marginal cost equal to the price in each market. Using the demand functions \(Q_E = 4000000 - 100P_E\) and \(Q_u = 1000000 - 20P_u\), we can find the quantity for each market by setting \(P_E = $20000\) and \(P_u = $20000\), and solving the equations for \(Q_E\) and \(Q_u\).
02

Calculate the total profit for each market

The total profit in each market can be calculated by subtracting the total cost from the total revenue. Total revenue is the product of the quantity sold and the price, while total cost is the product of the quantity and the constant marginal cost, plus the fixed cost.
03

Analyze the situation when BMW has to charge the same price in both markets

Here, we need to find the price that maximizes profit in both markets combined. With the assumption of the same price in each market, we will solve for the price from one of the demand functions, and use it to find the quantities in each market. Afterwards, we will calculate the company's profit similarly as in Step 2.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Price Discrimination
Price discrimination is a strategy where a company charges different prices for the same product to different groups of consumers, often based on their willingness to pay, geographical location, or other distinguishing characteristics. The goal is to capture consumer surplus, which is the difference between what consumers are willing to pay and what they actually pay, thus increasing a company's revenue and profits.

In the context of the exercise, BMW has the opportunity to implement price discrimination by setting different prices for its cars in Europe and the United States. The demand functions provided (Q_E = 4000000 - 100P_E for Europe and Q_U = 1000000 - 20P_U for the United States) allow BMW to determine the optimal price in each market to maximize profit based on differing demand elasticities. As long as BMW can prevent arbitrage, i.e., customers buying in one market and selling in another, it can successfully practice price discrimination and enhance its profits.
Profit Maximization
Profit maximization is the process by which a company determines the price and output level that delivers the highest profit. The fundamental condition for profit maximization is that the company produces up to the point where marginal cost (MC) equals marginal revenue (MR). Marginal cost is the increase in total cost when one more unit is produced, and marginal revenue is the additional income from selling one more unit of a product.

In this case, BMW's marginal cost is constant at \(20,000. The profit-maximizing strategy requires BMW to set prices in both markets where the resulting quantity demanded will equal the quantities at which the marginal cost is \)20,000. The provided exercise walks through the calculation to determine the optimal quantity and price for BMW cars in each market to achieve maximum profit.
Demand Function Economics
In economics, the demand function is a mathematical representation that defines the quantity of a good or service that consumers are willing and able to purchase at various prices, assuming all other factors remain constant (ceteris paribus). The demand function typically has a negative slope, indicating an inverse relationship between price and quantity demanded.

The exercise presents two demand functions for BMW in different markets: Q_E = 4000000 - 100P_E for Europe and Q_U = 1000000 - 20P_U for the United States. These equations suggest that as the price increases, the quantity demanded decreases. Solving these functions given the marginal cost allows BMW to determine the price to charge for each car sold in both markets to align with consumer demand and maximize profits.
Market Equilibrium
Market equilibrium occurs when the quantity demanded by consumers equals the quantity supplied by producers, resulting in a stable market price. At this point, the economic forces of supply and demand are balanced, and there is no tendency for the price to change, assuming other factors are held constant.

When BMW considers charging the same price in both Europe and the United States, it is attempting to find a market equilibrium that will apply across both markets. However, because the demand functions are different for each market, this single pricing strategy might not result in the profit-maximizing equilibrium found in each market separately. In part b of the exercise, we investigate the outcome of a single price across both markets and calculate the new quantity sold, the equilibrium price, and the resulting company profit.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Many retail video stores offer two alternative plans for renting films: A two-part tariff: Pay an annual membership fee (e.g., \(\$ 40\) ) and then pay a small fee for the daily rental of each film (e.g., \(\$ 2\) per film per day). A straight rental fee: Pay no membership fee, but pay a higher daily rental fee (e.g., \$4 per film per day). What is the logic behind the two-part tariff in this case? Why offer the customer a choice of two plans rather than simply a two-part tariff?

As the owner of the only tennis club in an isolated wealthy community, you must decide on membership dues and fees for court time, There are two types of tennis players. "Serious" players have demand $$Q_{1}=10-P$$ where \(Q_{1}\) is court hours per week and \(P\) is the fee per hour for each individual player. There are also "occasional" players with demand $$Q_{2}=4-0.25 P$$ Assume that there are 1000 players of each type. Because you have plenty of courts, the marginal cost of court time is zero. You have fixed costs of \(\$ 10,000\) per week. Serious and occasional players look alike, so you must charge them the same prices. a. Suppose that to maintain a "professional" atmosphere, you want to limit membership to serious players. How should you set the anmul membership dues and court fees (assume 52 weeks per year) to maximize profits, keeping in mind the constraint that only serious players choose to join? What would profits be (per week)? b. A friend tells you that you could make greater profits by encouraging both types of players to join. Is your friend right? What annual dues and court fees would maximize weekly profits? What would these profits be? c. Suppose that over the years, young, upwardly mobile professionals move to your community, all of whom are serious players. You believe there are now 3000 serious players and 1000 occasional players. Would it still be profitable to cater to the occasional player? What would be the profitmaximizing annual dues and court fees? What would profits be per week?

You are an executive for Super Computer, Inc. (SC), which rents out super computers. SC receives a fixed rental payment per time period in exchange for the right to unlimited computing at a rate of \(P\) cents per second. SC has two types of potential customers of equal number-10 businesses and 10 academic institutions. Each business customer has the demand function \(Q=10-P,\) where \(Q\) is in millions of seconds per month; each academic institution has the demand \(Q=8-P\). The marginal cost to \(\mathrm{SC}\) of additional computing is 2 cents per second, regardless of volume. a. Suppose that you could separate business and academic customers. What rental fee and usage fee would you charge each group? What would be your profits? b. Suppose you were unable to keep the two types of customers separate and charged a zero rental fee. What usage fee would maximize your profits? What would be your profits? c. Suppose you set up one two-part tariff-that is, you set one rental and one usage fee that both business and academic customers pay. What usage and rental fees would you set? What would be your profits? Explain why price would not be equal to marginal cost.

Price discrimination requires the ability to sort customers and the ability to prevent arbitrage. Explain how the following can function as price discrimination schemes and discuss both sorting and arbitrage: a. Requiring airline travelers to spend at least one Saturday night away from home to qualify for a low fare. b. Insisting on delivering cement to buyers and basing prices on buyers' locations. c. Selling food processors along with coupons that can be sent to the manufacturer for a \(\$ 10\) rebate. d. Offering temporary price cuts on bathroom tissue. e. Charging high-income patients more than lowincome patients for plastic surgery.

Some years ago, an article appeared in the New York Times about IBM's pricing policy. The previous day, IBM had announced major price cuts on most of its small and medium-sized computers. The article said: IBM probably has no choice but to cut prices periodically to get its customers to purchase more and lease less. If they succeed, this could make life more difficult for IBM's major competitors. Outright purchases of computers are needed for ever larger IBM revenues and profits, says Morgan Stanley's Ulric Weil in his new book, Information Systems in the \(80^{\circ}\) s. Mr. Weil declares that IBM cannot revert to an emphasis on leasing. a. Provide a brief but clear argument in support of the claim that IBM should try "to get its customers to purchase more and lease less." b. Provide a brief but clear argument against this claim. c. What factors determine whether leasing or selling is preferable for a company like IBM? Explain briefly.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free