Log out Go to App
Go to App

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 12: Problem 8

Suppose the airline industry consisted of only two firms: American and Texas Air Corp. Let the two firms have identical cost functions, \(C(q)=40 q\). Assume that the demand curve for the industry is given by \(P=100-Q\) and that each firm expects the other to behave as a Cournot competitor. a. Calculate the Cournot-Nash equilibrium for each firm, assuming that each chooses the output level that maximizes its profits when taking its rival's output as given. What are the profits of each firm? b. What would be the equilibrium quantity if Texas Air had constant marginal and average costs of \(\$ 25\) and American had constant marginal and average costs of \(\$ 40 ?\) c. Assuming that both firms have the original cost function, \(C(q)=40 q,\) how much should Texas Air be willing to invest to lower its marginal cost from 40 to \(25,\) assuming that American will not follow suit? How much should American be willing to spend to reduce its marginal cost to \(25,\) assuming that Texas Air will have marginal costs of 25 regardless of American's actions?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The Cournot-Nash equilibrium quantities are Qa = 20 and Qt = 20 with each firm making a profit of $1200 with the original cost function. If both firms have different cost functions with Texas Air having marginal cost of $25 and American having marginal cost of $40, the equilibrium quantities are Qa = 15 and Qt = 30. Texas Air should be willing to spend up to $375 to lower its marginal cost while American should be willing to pay up to $225 to lower its marginal cost, assuming that Texas Air will have marginal costs of 25 regardless of American's actions.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the Cournot-Nash equilibrium

First start by calculating the Cournot-Nash Equilibrium. This is done by setting up the profit function for each firm, differentiating them with respect to their respective quantities and setting equal to zero (maximization of profits). The profit function is \( \pi = P*Q - C(Q) \) where P is the price, Q is quantity and C(Q) is the cost function. Substitute P and C(Q) with the given equations to get \( \pi = (100 - Qa - Qt)*Qa - 40*Qa \) for American and \( \pi = (100 - Qa - Qt)*Qt - 40*Qt \) for Texas Air. Solve these simultaneously to find the quantity for each firm in equilibrium.
02

Calculate New Equilibrium Quantity

In step two, redo the profit maximization but with new costs for both firms. For Texas Air, the cost is constant at 25 while for American, it remains at 40. So the profit functions now become \( \pi = (100 - Qa - Qt)*Qa - 40*Qa \) for American and \( \pi = (100 - Qa - Qt)*Qt - 25*Qt \) for Texas Air. Solve these simultaneously to find the new equilibrium quantity.
03

Calculate investment to lower Marginal Costs

After changing the cost function for Texas Air to the lower marginal cost of 25, calculate how much each firm should be willing to spend to lower their marginal costs to 25. This is done by finding the difference between the profits with the original cost function and the new lower cost function, and this difference equals the amount they should be willing to spend.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Start your free trial

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Two firms compete in selling identical widgets. They choose their output levels \(Q_{1}\) and \(Q_{2}\) simultaneously and face the demand curve $$P=30-Q$$ where \(Q=Q_{1}+Q_{2}\). Until recently, both firms had zero marginal costs. Recent environmental regulations have increased Firm \(2^{\prime}\) s marginal cost to \(\$ 15 .\) Firm \(1^{\prime}\) s marginal cost remains constant at zero. True or false: As a result, the market price will rise to the monopoly level Suppose that two identical firms produce widgets and

Suppose that two competing firms, \(A\) and \(B\), produce a homogeneous good. Both firms have a marginal cost of \(\mathrm{MC}=\$ 50 .\) Describe what would happen to output and price in each of the following situations if the firms are at (i) Cournot equilibrium, (ii) collusive equilibrium, and (iii) Bertrand equilibrium. a. Because Firm \(A\) must increase wages, its \(\mathrm{MC}\) increases to \(\$ 80\). b. The marginal cost of both firms increases. c. The demand curve shifts to the right.

Suppose that two identical firms produce widgets and that they are the only firms in the market. Their costs are given by \(C_{1}=60 Q_{1}\) and \(C_{2}=60 Q_{2}\), where \(Q_{1}\) is the output of Firm 1 and \(Q_{2}\) the output of Firm 2. Price is determined by the following demand curve: $$P=300-Q$$ where \(Q=Q_{1}+Q_{2}\) a. Find the Cournot-Nash equilibrium. Calculate the profit of each firm at this equilibrium. b. Suppose the two firms form a cartel to maximize joint profits. How many widgets will be produced? Calculate each firm's profit. c. Suppose Firm 1 were the only firm in the industry. How would market output and Firm \(1^{\prime}\) s profit differ from that found in part (b) above? d. Returning to the duopoly of part (b), suppose Firm 1 abides by the agreement but Firm 2 cheats by increasing production. How many widgets will Firm 2 produce? What will be each firm's profits?

Suppose all firms in a monopolistically competitive industry were merged into one large firm. Would that new firm produce as many different brands? Would it produce only a single brand? Explain.

Two firms produce luxury sheepskin auto seat covers: Western Where (WW) and B.B.B. Sheep (BBBS). Each firm has a cost function given by $$C(q)=30 q+1.5 q^{2}$$ The market demand for these seat covers is represented by the inverse demand equation $$P=300-3 Q$$ where \(Q=q_{1}+q_{2},\) total output. a. If each firm acts to maximize its profits, taking its rival's output as given (i.e., the firms behave as Cournot oligopolists), what will be the equilibrium quantities selected by each firm? What is total output, and what is the market price? What are the profits for each firm? b. It occurs to the managers of \(\mathrm{WW}\) and \(\mathrm{BBBS}\) that they could do a lot better by colluding. If the two firms collude, what will be the profit-maximizing choice of output? The industry price? The output and the profit for each firm in this case? c. The managers of these firms realize that explicit agreements to collude are illegal. Each firm must decide on its own whether to produce the Cournot quantity or the cartel quantity. To aid in making the decision, the manager of WW constructs a payoff matrix like the one below. Fill in each box with the profit of \(\mathrm{WW}\) and the profit of BBBS. Given this payoff matrix, what output strategy is each firm likely to pursue? d. Suppose WW can set its output level before BBBS does. How much will WW choose to produce in this case? How much will BBBS produce? What is the market price, and what is the profit for each firm? Is WW better off by choosing its output first? Explain why or why not.
See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free