Three contestants, \(A, B,\) and \(C,\) each has a balloon and a pistol. From fixed positions, they fire at each other's balloons. When a balloon is hit, its owner is out. When only one balloon remains, its owner gets a \(\$ 1000\) prize. At the outset, the players decide by lot the order in which they will fire, and each player can choose any remaining balloon as his target. Everyone knows that \(A\) is the best shot and always hits the target, that \(B\) hits the target with probability \(.9,\) and that \(C\) hits the target with probability \(.8 .\) Which contestant has the highest probability of winning the \(\$ 1000 ?\) Explain why.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Overall, A has the highest probability of winning the prize, with a chance of approximately 0.167.

Step by step solution

01

Determine the shooting order

As the shooting order is determined by lot, every player has 1/3 chance to shoot first, second, or third.
02

Analyze possible scenarios if Player A shoots first

Player A always hits the target. This means that if A shoots first, he will definitely hit someone's balloon. The logical choice for A would be to shoot B, as he is the second best shooter, leaving the weakest shooter, C, in the game. If A shoots first and hits B, we are left with a duel between A and C, where A has a 100% chance to hit the balloon and C only 80%. In this duel, A will win the game if he gets to shoot first, which happens in 50% of the cases. Therefore, the chance of A winning if he shoots first is 1/3 (chance to shoot first) * 1/2 (chance to win the duel) = 1/6.
03

Analyze possible scenarios if Player B shoots first

If B shoots first, he will choose to eliminate A from the game because A is the best shooter. If B manages to hit A's balloon (which happens with probability 0.9), it's then a duel between B and C. In this duel, B will win if he shoots first, which happens 50% of the time. Therefore, the chance of B winning if he shoots first is 1/3 (chance to shoot first) * 0.9 (chance to hit A's balloon) * 1/2 (chance to win the duel) = 0.15.
04

Analyze possible scenarios if Player C shoots first

If C shoots first, he will also aim at A because A is the best shooter. If C manages to hit A's balloon (which happens with probability 0.8), then there's a duel between B and C. In this duel, C will only win if B misses, which happens with a probability of 0.1. Therefore, the chance of C winning if he shoots first is 1/3 (chance to shoot first) * 0.8 (chance to hit A's balloon) * 0.1 (chance B misses) = 0.027.
05

Sum up the probabilities of winning for each player

Adding up the probabilities from each of the scenarios, we find that A has a probability of 1/6, or approximately 0.167, to win the game; B has a probability of 0.15 to win; and C has a probability of 0.027 to win.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

An antique dealer regularly buys objects at hometown auctions whose bidders are limited to other dealers. Most of her successful bids turn out to be financially worthwhile because she is able to resell the antiques for a profit. On occasion, however, she travels to a nearby town to bid in an auction that is open to the public. She often finds that on the rare occasions in which she does bid successfully, she is disappointed the antique cannot be sold at a profit. Can you explain the difference in her success between the two sets of circumstances?

Defendo has decided to introduce a revolutionary video game. As the first firm in the market, it will have a monopoly position for at least some time. In deciding what type of manufacturing plant to build, it has the choice of two technologies. Technology \(A\) is publicly available and will result in annual costs of \\[ C^{A}(q)=10+8 q \\] Technology \(B\) is a proprietary technology developed in Defendo's research labs. It involves a higher fixed cost of production but lower marginal costs: \\[ C^{B}(q)=60+2 q \\] Defendo must decide which technology to adopt. Market demand for the new product is \(P=20-Q\) where \(Q\) is total industry output. a. Suppose Defendo were certain that it would maintain its monopoly position in the market for the entire product lifespan (about five years) without threat of entry. Which technology would you advise Defendo to adopt? What would be Defendo's profit given this choice? b. Suppose Defendo expects its archrival, Offendo, to consider entering the market shortly after Defendo introduces its new product. Offendo will have access only to Technology \(A\). If Offendo does enter the market, the two firms will play a Cournot game (in quantities) and arrive at the Cournot-Nash equilibrium. i. If Defendo adopts Technology \(A\) and Offendo enters the market, what will be the profit of each firm? Would Offendo choose to enter the market given these profits? ii. If Defendo adopts Technology \(B\) and Offendo enters the market, what will be the profit of each firm? Would Offendo choose to enter the market given these profits? iii. Which technology would you advise Defendo to adopt given the threat of possible entry? What will be Defendo's profit given this choice? What will be consumer surplus given this choice? c. What happens to social welfare (the sum of consumer surplus and producer profit) as a result of the threat of entry in this market? What happens to equilibrium price? What might this imply about the role of potential competition in limiting market power?

You are in the market for a new house and have decided to bid for a house at auction. You believe that the value of the house is between \(\$ 125,000\) and \(\$ 150,000,\) but you are uncertain as to where in the range it might be. You do know, however, that the seller has reserved the right to withdraw the house from the market if the winning bid is not satisfactory. a. Should you bid in this auction? Why or why not? b. Suppose you are a building contractor. You plan to improve the house and then to resell it at a profit. How does this situation affect your answer to (a)? Does it depend on the extent to which your skills are uniquely suitable to improving this particular house?

Many industries are often plagued by overcapacity: Firms simultaneously invest in capacity expansion, so that total capacity far exceeds demand. This happens not only in industries in which demand is highly volatile and unpredictable, but also in industries in which demand is fairly stable. What factors lead to overcapacity? Explain each briefly.

In many oligopolistic industries, the same firms compete over a long period of time, setting prices and observing each other's behavior repeatedly. Given the large number of repetitions, why don't collusive outcomes typically result?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free