You play the following bargaining game. Player \(A\) moves first and makes Player \(B\) an offer for the division of \(\$ 100 .\) (For example, Player \(A\) could suggest that she take \(\$ 60\) and Player \(B\) take \(\$ 40 .\) ) Player \(B\) can accept or reject the offer. If he rejects it, the amount of money available drops to \(\$ 90,\) and he then makes an offer for the division of this amount. If Player \(A\) rejects this offer, the amount of money drops to \(\$ 80\) and Player \(A\) makes an offer for its division. If Player \(B\) rejects this offer, the amount of money drops to 0 Both players are rational, fully informed, and want to maximize their payoffs. Which player will do best in this game?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Player A will do best in this game because he gets to make the first offer and the structure of the game allows him to ensure that he gets at least as much as he would in the second stage.

Step by step solution

01

Interpret Player B's Optimal Strategy

We start from the back (or the smallest bargain) to find the optimal strategy. Under the assumption that Player A will reject any offer where Player B gets more than half of the money, Player B should therefore offer Player A the smallest amount that A will accept. Assuming A will not accept less than $40 at the $80 stage, Player B should offer $40 to A and keep $50 for himself.
02

Determine Player A's Optimal Strategy at the $90 Stage

At the $90 stage, Player A will want to obtain at least as much as they would get at the $80 stage. Knowing that Player B will choose optimally in the next round and offer them $40, Player A should make an offer that Player B will accept but no more. Therefore, Player A should offer Player B $50 and keep $40 for himself.
03

Determine Player A's Optimal Strategy at the $100 Stage

At the $100 stage, Player A will want to obtain at least as much as they would get at the $90 stage. Therefore, Player A should offer Player B $60 and keep $40 for himself.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Many industries are often plagued by overcapacity: Firms simultaneously invest in capacity expansion, so that total capacity far exceeds demand. This happens not only in industries in which demand is highly volatile and unpredictable, but also in industries in which demand is fairly stable. What factors lead to overcapacity? Explain each briefly.

An antique dealer regularly buys objects at hometown auctions whose bidders are limited to other dealers. Most of her successful bids turn out to be financially worthwhile because she is able to resell the antiques for a profit. On occasion, however, she travels to a nearby town to bid in an auction that is open to the public. She often finds that on the rare occasions in which she does bid successfully, she is disappointed the antique cannot be sold at a profit. Can you explain the difference in her success between the two sets of circumstances?

In many oligopolistic industries, the same firms compete over a long period of time, setting prices and observing each other's behavior repeatedly. Given the large number of repetitions, why don't collusive outcomes typically result?

You are in the market for a new house and have decided to bid for a house at auction. You believe that the value of the house is between \(\$ 125,000\) and \(\$ 150,000,\) but you are uncertain as to where in the range it might be. You do know, however, that the seller has reserved the right to withdraw the house from the market if the winning bid is not satisfactory. a. Should you bid in this auction? Why or why not? b. Suppose you are a building contractor. You plan to improve the house and then to resell it at a profit. How does this situation affect your answer to (a)? Does it depend on the extent to which your skills are uniquely suitable to improving this particular house?

Defendo has decided to introduce a revolutionary video game. As the first firm in the market, it will have a monopoly position for at least some time. In deciding what type of manufacturing plant to build, it has the choice of two technologies. Technology \(A\) is publicly available and will result in annual costs of \\[ C^{A}(q)=10+8 q \\] Technology \(B\) is a proprietary technology developed in Defendo's research labs. It involves a higher fixed cost of production but lower marginal costs: \\[ C^{B}(q)=60+2 q \\] Defendo must decide which technology to adopt. Market demand for the new product is \(P=20-Q\) where \(Q\) is total industry output. a. Suppose Defendo were certain that it would maintain its monopoly position in the market for the entire product lifespan (about five years) without threat of entry. Which technology would you advise Defendo to adopt? What would be Defendo's profit given this choice? b. Suppose Defendo expects its archrival, Offendo, to consider entering the market shortly after Defendo introduces its new product. Offendo will have access only to Technology \(A\). If Offendo does enter the market, the two firms will play a Cournot game (in quantities) and arrive at the Cournot-Nash equilibrium. i. If Defendo adopts Technology \(A\) and Offendo enters the market, what will be the profit of each firm? Would Offendo choose to enter the market given these profits? ii. If Defendo adopts Technology \(B\) and Offendo enters the market, what will be the profit of each firm? Would Offendo choose to enter the market given these profits? iii. Which technology would you advise Defendo to adopt given the threat of possible entry? What will be Defendo's profit given this choice? What will be consumer surplus given this choice? c. What happens to social welfare (the sum of consumer surplus and producer profit) as a result of the threat of entry in this market? What happens to equilibrium price? What might this imply about the role of potential competition in limiting market power?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free