Log out Go to App
Go to App

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 18: Problem 1

A number of firms have located in the western portion of a town after single- family residences took up the eastern portion. Each firm produces the same product and in the process emits noxious fumes that adversely affect the residents of the community. a. Why is there an externality created by the firms? b. Do you think that private bargaining can resolve the problem? Explain. c. How might the community determine the efficient level of air quality?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The externality is created due to the firms' noxious emissions affecting residents without bearing the cost. While private bargaining could be a potential solution, the number of parties and complexity of defining property rights over air quality could make this ineffective. The community could determine the efficient air quality level by performing a Cost-Benefit Analysis, balancing the cost of pollution remediation by the firms and the health and environmental benefits to residents.

Step by step solution

01

Reason for Externality Creation

The externality is created by the firms' activity of producing products that emit noxious fumes. This production process consequently leads to air pollution which negatively impacts the residents, however, the firms do not bear the cost of these negative impacts. This situation is a classic example of a negative externality, where the cost of production is not fully reflected in the price of the product.
02

Potential of Private Bargaining

The Coase theorem states that private bargaining can indeed solve externality problems, given that transaction costs are low and property rights are clearly defined. However, in this case, the number of firms and residents involved could make negotiation complex and transaction costs could be high. Moreover, defining property rights over air quality can be challenging. Therefore, private bargaining may not effectively resolve the problem here.
03

Determining Efficient Level of Air Quality

The community can determine the efficient level of air quality by balancing the marginal social cost with the marginal social benefit of an action. They may conduct a Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) by taking into account the cost of remediating the pollution (borne by the firms) and the benefits, which are improved health and environmental quality (accrued to the residents). Decision to determine the right level of air quality should be made at the point where marginal social cost equals marginal social benefit.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Start your free trial

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The market for paper in a particular region in the United States is characterized by the following demand and supply curves: \\[ Q_{D}=160,000-2000 P \quad \text { and } \quad Q_{S}=40,000+2000 P \\] where \(Q_{D}\) is the quantity demanded in 100 -pound lots, \(Q_{\mathrm{S}}\) is the quantity supplied in 100 -pound lots, and \(P\) is the price per 100 -pound lot. Currently there is no attempt to regulate the dumping of effluent into streams and rivers by the paper mills. As a result, dumping is widespread. The marginal external cost (MEC) associated with the production of paper is given by the curve \(\mathrm{MEC}=0.0006 Q_{S}\) a. Calculate the output and price of paper if it is produced under competitive conditions and no attempt is made to monitor or regulate the dumping of effluent. b. Determine the socially efficient price and output of paper. c. Explain why the answers you calculated in parts (a) and (b) differ.

Reconsider the common resource problem given in Example \(18.7 .\) Suppose that crawfish popularity continues to increase, and that the demand curve shifts from \(C=0.401-0.0064 F\) to \(C=0.50-0.0064 F\) How does this shift in demand affect the actual crawfish catch, the efficient catch, and the social cost of common access? (Hint: Use the marginal social cost and private cost curves given in the example.)

Medical research has shown the negative health effects of "secondhand" smoke. Recent social trends point to growing intolerance of smoking in public areas. If you are a smoker and you wish to continue smoking despite tougher anti- smoking laws, describe the effect of the following legislative proposals on your behavior. As a result of these programs, do you, the individual smoker, benefit? Does society benefit as a whole? a. A bill is proposed that would lower tar and nicotine levels in all cigarettes. b. A tax is levied on each pack of cigarettes. c. \(A\) tax is levied on each pack of cigarettes sold. d. Smokers would be required to carry governmentissued smoking permits at all times.

Assume that scientific studies provide you with the following information concerning the benefits and costs of sulfur dioxide emissions: Benefits of abating (reduc- \\[ \mathrm{MB}=500-20 A \\] ing ) emissions: costs of abating emissions: \\[ \mathrm{MC}=200+5 A \\] where \(A\) is the quantity abated in millions of tons and the benefits and costs are given in dollars per ton. a. What is the socially efficient level of emissions abatement? b. What are the marginal benefit and marginal cost of abatement at the socially efficient level of abatement? c. What happens to net social benefits (benefits minus costs) if you abate one million more tons than the efficient level? One million fewer? d. Why is it socially efficient to set marginal benefits equal to marginal costs rather than abating until total benefits equal total costs?

In a market for dry cleaning, the inverse market demand function is given by \(P=100-Q\), and the (private) marginal cost of production for the aggregation of all dry-cleaning firms is given by \(\mathrm{MC}=10+Q\) Finally, the pollution generated by the dry cleaning process creates external damages given by the marginal external cost curve \(\mathrm{MEC}=Q\) a. Calculate the output and price of dry cleaning if it is produced under competitive conditions without regulation. b. Determine the socially efficient price and output of dry cleaning. c. Determine the tax that would result in a competitive market producing the socially efficient output. d. Calculate the output and price of dry cleaning if it is produced under monopolistic conditions without regulation. e. Determine the tax that would result in a monopolistic market producing the socially efficient output. f. Assuming that no attempt is made to monitor or regulate the pollution, which market structure vields higher social welfare? Discuss.
See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free