Log out Go to App
Go to App

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 18: Problem 2

A computer programmer lobbies against copyrighting software, arguing that everyone should benefit from innovative programs written for personal computers and that exposure to a wide variety of computer programs will inspire young programmers to create even more innovative programs. Considering the marginal social benefits possibly gained by this proposal, do you agree with this position?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Agreement or disagreement with the programmer's position would depend on one's understanding of the potential marginal social benefits. The open sharing of software could potentially deliver benefits in terms of increased knowledge and innovation, but might also reduce incentives for original creators. Hence, a balanced response would acknowledge both sides of the argument.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Argument

Firstly, it is necessary to comprehend the argument made by the programmer. Essentially, the programmer believes that everyone should benefit from innovative software, implying that restrictions like copyrights could prevent this broad benefit. The programmer also argues that exposure to diverse computer programs would inspire more innovation.
02

Understanding Marginal Social Benefits

The concept of marginal social benefit refers to the total increase in societal benefit or welfare from consuming or producing one extra unit of a good. In this context, one has to consider the societal benefits that could be achieved if software were freely accessible for everyone and could be used as inspiration for new software innovations.
03

Evaluating the Proposal

Remember to evaluate both the positive and negative implications of this proposal. On the positive side, freer access to software could indeed inspire young programmers and create a more innovative software industry. It could also result in broader societal benefits in terms of increased knowledge and skills. However, drawbacks might include reduced incentives for original software creators if they can't monetize their creations effectively. This could potentially stifle innovation and creativity in the long run.
04

Formulating a Response

After consideration of all factors, a response can be formulated. Whether one agrees or disagrees with the position would depend on one's assessment of the potential marginal social benefits against potential disadvantages.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Start your free trial

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The market for paper in a particular region in the United States is characterized by the following demand and supply curves: \\[ Q_{D}=160,000-2000 P \quad \text { and } \quad Q_{S}=40,000+2000 P \\] where \(Q_{D}\) is the quantity demanded in 100 -pound lots, \(Q_{\mathrm{S}}\) is the quantity supplied in 100 -pound lots, and \(P\) is the price per 100 -pound lot. Currently there is no attempt to regulate the dumping of effluent into streams and rivers by the paper mills. As a result, dumping is widespread. The marginal external cost (MEC) associated with the production of paper is given by the curve \(\mathrm{MEC}=0.0006 Q_{S}\) a. Calculate the output and price of paper if it is produced under competitive conditions and no attempt is made to monitor or regulate the dumping of effluent. b. Determine the socially efficient price and output of paper. c. Explain why the answers you calculated in parts (a) and (b) differ.

There are three groups in a community. Their demand curves for public television in hours of programming, \(T,\) are given respectively by \\[ \begin{array}{l} W_{1}=\$ 200-T \\ W_{2}=\$ 240-2 T \\ W_{3}=\$ 320-2 T \end{array} \\] Suppose public television is a pure public good that can be produced at a constant marginal cost of \(\$ 200\) per hour a. What is the efficient number of hours of public television? b. How much public television would a competitive private market provide?

A number of firms have located in the western portion of a town after single- family residences took up the eastern portion. Each firm produces the same product and in the process emits noxious fumes that adversely affect the residents of the community. a. Why is there an externality created by the firms? b. Do you think that private bargaining can resolve the problem? Explain. c. How might the community determine the efficient level of air quality?

In a market for dry cleaning, the inverse market demand function is given by \(P=100-Q\), and the (private) marginal cost of production for the aggregation of all dry-cleaning firms is given by \(\mathrm{MC}=10+Q\) Finally, the pollution generated by the dry cleaning process creates external damages given by the marginal external cost curve \(\mathrm{MEC}=Q\) a. Calculate the output and price of dry cleaning if it is produced under competitive conditions without regulation. b. Determine the socially efficient price and output of dry cleaning. c. Determine the tax that would result in a competitive market producing the socially efficient output. d. Calculate the output and price of dry cleaning if it is produced under monopolistic conditions without regulation. e. Determine the tax that would result in a monopolistic market producing the socially efficient output. f. Assuming that no attempt is made to monitor or regulate the pollution, which market structure vields higher social welfare? Discuss.

Four firms located at different points on a river dump various quantities of effluent into it. The effluent adversely affects the quality of swimming for homeowners who live downstream. These people can build swimming pools to avoid swimming in the river, and the firms can purchase filters that eliminate harmful chemicals dumped in the river. As a policy adviser for a regional planning organization, how would you compare and contrast the following options for dealing with the harmful effect of the effluent: a. An equal-rate effluent fee on firms located on the river. b. An equal standard per firm on the level of effluent that each can dump. c. A transferable effluent permit system in which the aggregate level of effluent is fixed and all firms receive identical permits.
See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free