In a market for dry cleaning, the inverse market demand function is given by \(P=100-Q\), and the (private) marginal cost of production for the aggregation of all dry-cleaning firms is given by \(\mathrm{MC}=10+Q\) Finally, the pollution generated by the dry cleaning process creates external damages given by the marginal external cost curve \(\mathrm{MEC}=Q\) a. Calculate the output and price of dry cleaning if it is produced under competitive conditions without regulation. b. Determine the socially efficient price and output of dry cleaning. c. Determine the tax that would result in a competitive market producing the socially efficient output. d. Calculate the output and price of dry cleaning if it is produced under monopolistic conditions without regulation. e. Determine the tax that would result in a monopolistic market producing the socially efficient output. f. Assuming that no attempt is made to monitor or regulate the pollution, which market structure vields higher social welfare? Discuss.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a) In a competitive market without regulation, dry cleaning output is 45 and price is 55. b) The socially efficient output is 30 and the price is 70. c) The tax that would result in a competitive market producing the socially efficient output is 30. d) Under monopolistic conditions without regulation, the output is 30 and price is 70. e) The tax that would result in a monopolistic market producing the socially efficient output is 30. f) In the absence of regulation of pollution, a monopolistic market provides higher social welfare as it produces less than or equal to the socially efficient level, thereby causing less pollution.

Step by step solution

01

Part a: Calculate Competitive Output and Price

In a competitive market, firms set the private Marginal Cost (MC) equal to the price. So, \(P = MC\), inserting given values \(100 - Q = 10 + Q\). Solving this we get \(Q = 45\) and \(P = 55\) .
02

Part b: Determine Socially Efficient Price and Output

In a socially efficient outcome, the social cost (private MC + MEC) is equal to the price. So, \(P = MC + MEC\), inserting given values \(100 - Q = 10 + Q + Q\). Solving this we get \(Q = 30\) and \(P = 70\).
03

Part c: Determine the Tax for Competitive Market Efficiency

The tax required to bring the competitive market to social efficiency is the difference between the private MC and the social cost at the socially efficient point. Thus, we get \(\text{Tax} = MEC(Q) = Q = 30\) .
04

Part d: Calculate Monopolistic Output and Price

Under monopolistic conditions without regulation, the firm equates Marginal Revenue (MR) to Marginal Cost (MC). MR is calculated by deriving the revenue function which is \(P*Q = (100 - Q)*Q\), giving \(MR = 100 - 2Q\). Setting this equal to the marginal cost \(MC = 10 + Q\) gives \(Q = 30\), and \(P = 70\).
05

Part e: Determine the Tax for Monopolistic Market Efficiency

The same approach used in part c is applied in part e. The tax is equal to the marginal external cost (MEC) at the point which the social cost equals the price. Thus, we get \(\text{Tax} = MEC(Q) = Q = 30\).
06

Part f: Discuss Which Market Structure Provides Higher Welfare

Without regulation of pollution, competitive markets often produce a higher amount of output compared to the socially efficient level, as in this case (45 vs 30). Conversely, monopolistic markets, tend to produce less than or equal to the socially efficient level (30 in this case). Therefore, in the absence of pollution regulation, the monopolistic market may provide higher social welfare as it restricts production, thus creating less pollution.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The market for paper in a particular region in the United States is characterized by the following demand and supply curves: \\[ Q_{D}=160,000-2000 P \quad \text { and } \quad Q_{S}=40,000+2000 P \\] where \(Q_{D}\) is the quantity demanded in 100 -pound lots, \(Q_{\mathrm{S}}\) is the quantity supplied in 100 -pound lots, and \(P\) is the price per 100 -pound lot. Currently there is no attempt to regulate the dumping of effluent into streams and rivers by the paper mills. As a result, dumping is widespread. The marginal external cost (MEC) associated with the production of paper is given by the curve \(\mathrm{MEC}=0.0006 Q_{S}\) a. Calculate the output and price of paper if it is produced under competitive conditions and no attempt is made to monitor or regulate the dumping of effluent. b. Determine the socially efficient price and output of paper. c. Explain why the answers you calculated in parts (a) and (b) differ.

Medical research has shown the negative health effects of "secondhand" smoke. Recent social trends point to growing intolerance of smoking in public areas. If you are a smoker and you wish to continue smoking despite tougher anti- smoking laws, describe the effect of the following legislative proposals on your behavior. As a result of these programs, do you, the individual smoker, benefit? Does society benefit as a whole? a. A bill is proposed that would lower tar and nicotine levels in all cigarettes. b. A tax is levied on each pack of cigarettes. c. \(A\) tax is levied on each pack of cigarettes sold. d. Smokers would be required to carry governmentissued smoking permits at all times.

A computer programmer lobbies against copyrighting software, arguing that everyone should benefit from innovative programs written for personal computers and that exposure to a wide variety of computer programs will inspire young programmers to create even more innovative programs. Considering the marginal social benefits possibly gained by this proposal, do you agree with this position?

Reconsider the common resource problem given in Example \(18.7 .\) Suppose that crawfish popularity continues to increase, and that the demand curve shifts from \(C=0.401-0.0064 F\) to \(C=0.50-0.0064 F\) How does this shift in demand affect the actual crawfish catch, the efficient catch, and the social cost of common access? (Hint: Use the marginal social cost and private cost curves given in the example.)

The Georges Bank, a highly productive fishing area off New England, can be divided into two zones in terms of fish population. Zone 1 has the higher population per square mile but is subject to severe diminishing returns to fishing effort. The daily fish catch (in tons) in Zone 1 is $$F_{1}=200\left(X_{1}\right)-2\left(X_{1}\right)^{2}$$ where \(X_{1}\) is the number of boats fishing there. Zone 2 has fewer fish per mile but is larger, and diminishing returns are less of a problem. Its daily fish catch is \\[ F_{2}=100\left(X_{2}\right)-\left(X_{2}\right)^{2} \\] where \(X_{2}\) is the number of boats fishing in Zone \(2 .\) The marginal fish catch MFC in each zone can be represented as \\[ \begin{array}{l} \mathrm{MFC}_{1}=200-4\left(X_{1}\right) \\ \mathrm{MFC}_{2}=100-2\left(X_{2}\right) \end{array} \\] There are 100 boats now licensed by the U.S. government to fish in these two zones. The fish are sold at \(\$ 100\) per ton. Total cost (capital and operating) per boat is constant at \(\$ 1000\) per day. Answer the following questions about this situation: a. If the boats are allowed to fish where they want, with no government restriction, how many will fish in each zone? What will be the gross value of the catch? b. If the U.S. government can restrict the number and distribution of the boats, how many should be allocated to each zone? What will be the gross value of the catch? Assume the total number of boats remains at 100 c. If additional fishermen want to buy boats and join the fishing fleet, should a government wishing to maximize the net value of the catch grant them licenses? Why or why not?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free