UNIVERSAL SAVINGS \& LOAN has \$1000 to lend. Risk-free loans will be paid back in full next year with \(4 \%\) interest. Risky loans have a \(20 \%\) chance of defaulting (paying back nothing) and an \(80 \%\) chance of paying back in full with \(30 \%\) interest a. How much profit can the lending institution expect to earn? Show that the expected profits are the same whether the lending institution makes risky or risk-free loans. b. Now suppose that the lending institution knows that the government will "bail out" UNIVERSAL if there is a default (paying back the original \(\$ 1000\) ). What type of loans will the lending institution choose to make? What is the expected cost to the government? c. Suppose that the lending institution doesn't know for sure that there will be a bail out, but one will occur with probability \(P\). For what values of \(P\) will the lending institution make risky loans?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The lending institution can expect to earn \$240 from risky loans and \$40 from risk-free loans, under normal circumstances. If the government bails out the bank in case of default, the expected profit from risky loans increases, incentivizing the bank to issue risky loans. The lending institution will lend risky loans if the probability of getting bailed out is \(P >= 0.167\).

Step by step solution

01

Calculate Expected Profit from Risky and Risk-Free Loans

To calculate the expected profit from both types of loans, multiply the profit by the likelihood it will be realized. For risk-free loans, the profit is always \$40 (\(1000 * 4\% = 40\)). For risky loans, the expected profit is \(0.8 * 300 + 0.2 * 0 = 240\), where 300 is the profit in the case of payback in full and 0 in case of default.
02

Compare Expected Profits from Risky and Risk-Free Loans

As calculated in step 1, the lending institution can expect to earn a profit of \$40 from a risk-free loan and \$240 from a risky loan under normal circumstances. These conditions change if the government decides to intervene and bail out the bank in case of default.
03

Evaluate the Impact of a Government Bail-Out

If the government bails out the bank in case of default, the bank will get back the original \$1000. In this case, the expected profit from risky loans will be \$300 (\(0.8 * 300 + 0.2 * 1000 = 340\)). This raises profitability, incentivizing the bank to issue risky loans.
04

Find the Probability Threshold for Risky Loans

To find the critical probability (P) threshold at which the bank would choose risky loans, calculate the expected profit for varying probabilities and compare them. This would imply solving the equation \(0.04 * 1000 = (1 - P) * 0.3 * 1000 + P * 1000\) for \(P\).
05

Understand the Impact of the Threshold Probability

The value calculated in Step 4 indicates the specific probability value which when reached or superseded would make risky loans more attractive for the lending institution.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Professor Jones has just been hired by the economics department at a major university. The president of the board of regents has stated that the university is committed to providing top-quality education for undergraduates. Two months into the semester, Jones fails to show up for his classes. It seems he is devoting all his time to research rather than to teaching. Jones argues that his research will bring prestige to the department and the university. Should he be allowed to continue exclusively with research? Discuss with reference to the principal-agent problem.

Gary is a recent college graduate. After six months at his new job, he has finally saved enough to buy his first car. a. Gary knows very little about the difference between makes and models. How could he use market signals, reputation, or standardization to make comparisons? b. You are a loan officer in a bank. After selecting a car, Gary comes to you seeking a loan. Because he has only recently graduated, he does not have a long credit history. Nonetheless, the bank has a long history of financing cars for recent college graduates. Is this information useful in Gary's case? If so, how?

A firm's short-run revenue is given by \(R=10 e-e^{2}\) where \(e\) is the level of effort by a typical worker (all workers are assumed to be identical). A worker chooses his level of effort to maximize wage less effort \(w-e\) (the per-unit cost of effort is assumed to be 1). Determine the level of effort and the level of profit (revenue less wage paid) for each of the following wage arrangements. Explain why these different principal-agent relationships generate different outcomes. a. \(w=2\) for \(e \geq 1 ;\) otherwise \(w=0\) \(\mathbf{b} . w=R / 2\) c. \(w=R-12.5\)

As chairman of the board of ASP Industries, you estimate that your annual profit is given by the table below. Profit (\Pi) is conditional upon market demand and the effort of your new CEO. The probabilities of each demand condition occurring are also shown in the table. $$\begin{array}{|lccc|} \hline \begin{array}{c} \text { MARKET } \\ \text { DEMAND } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { LOW } \\ \text { DEMAND } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { MEDIUM } \\ \text { DEMAND } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { HIGH } \\ \text { DEMAND } \end{array} \\ \hline \begin{array}{l} \text { Market } \\ \text { Probabilities } \end{array} & .30 & .40 & .30 \\ \hline \text { Low Effort } & \Pi=\$ 5 \text { million } & \Pi=\$ 10 \text { million } \Pi=\$ 15 \text { million } \\ \hline \text { High Effort } & \Pi=\$ 10 \text { million } & \Pi=\$ 15 \text { million } \Pi=\$ 17 \text { million } \\ \hline \end{array}$$ You must design a compensation package for the CEO that will maximize the firm's expected profit. While the firm is risk neutral, the CEO is risk averse. The CEO's utility function is Utility \(=W^{5}\) when making low effort Utility \(=W^{5}-100\) when making high effort where \(W\) is the CEO's income. (The -100 is the "utility cost" to the CEO of making a high effort.) You know the CEO's utility function, and both you and the CEO know all of the information in the preceding table. You do not know the level of the CEO's effort at time of compensation or the exact state of demand. You do see the firm's profit, however. Of the three alternative compensation packages below, which do you as chairman of ASP Industries prefer? Why? Package 1: Pay the CEO a flat salary of \(\$ 575,000\) per yearr Package 2: Pay the CEO a fixed 6 percent of yearly firm profits Package 3 3: Pay the CEO a flat salary of \(\$ 500,000\) per year and then 50 percent of any firm profits above \(\$ 15\) million

To promote competition and consumer welfare, the Federal Trade Commission requires firms to advertise truthfully. How does truth in advertising promote competition? Why would a market be less competitive if firms advertised deceptively?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free