Log out Go to App
Go to App

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 18: Problem 2

A computer programmer lobbies against copyrighting software, arguing that everyone should benefit from innovative programs written for personal computers and that exposure to a wide variety of computer programs will inspire young programmers to create even more innovative programs. Considering the marginal social benefits possibly gained by this proposal, do you agree with this position?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Given the multiple perspectives on the issue, the question of whether one agrees with the programmer's position is subjective. From one perspective, the programmer's approach can democratize coding and inspire young learners. On the other hand, the lack of a viable financial incentive model for developers can potentially lead to slower technological progress. Therefore, it might be potentially beneficial to look for a middle ground that promotes public access and learning while protecting the interests of developers.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Argument

First, it's important to identify the main point of the argument. The programmer argues that everyone should benefit from innovative programs and various software exposure can inspire young programmers to generate more innovative programs.
02

Analyze Pros and Cons

Identify potential advantages and disadvantages of this proposal. The primary advantage is the free availability of software to all, fostering a culture of learning and innovation among upcoming programmers. The possible disadvantage may be the lack of financial incentive for developers to create new and innovative software, which might slow down technological progress.
03

Form an Opinion

Based on the analysis, form an opinion. It's important to remember that there is no 'right' or 'wrong' answer as such in this scenario as it mostly depends on one's perspective.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Start your free trial

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The market for paper in a particular region in the United States is characterized by the following demand and supply curves: \\[Q_{D}=160,000-2000 P \quad \text { and } \quad Q_{S}=40,000+2000 P\\] where \(Q_{D}\) is the quantity demanded in 100 -pound lots, \(Q_{S}\) is the quantity supplied in 100 -pound lots, and \(P\) is the price per 100 -pound lot. Currently there is no attempt to regulate the dumping of effluent into streams and rivers by the paper mills. As a result, dumping is widespread. The marginal external cost (MEC) associated with the production of paper is given by the curve \(\mathrm{MEC}=0.0006 \mathrm{Q}_{\mathrm{S}}.\) a. Calculate the output and price of paper if it is produced under competitive conditions and no attempt is made to monitor or regulate the dumping of effluent. b. Determine the socially efficient price and output of paper. c. Explain why the answers you calculated in parts (a) and (b) differ.

In a market for dry cleaning, the inverse market demand function is given by \(P=100-Q,\) and the (private \()\) marginal cost of production for the aggregation of all dry-cleaning firms is given by \(\mathrm{MC}=10+Q\). Finally, the pollution generated by the dry cleaning process creates external damages given by the marginal external cost curve \(\mathrm{MEC}=Q\). a. Calculate the output and price of dry cleaning if it is produced under competitive conditions without regulation. b. Determine the socially efficient price and output of dry cleaning. c. Determine the tax that would result in a competitive market producing the socially efficient output. d. Calculate the output and price of dry cleaning if it is produced under monopolistic conditions without regulation. e. Determine the tax that would result in a monopolistic market producing the socially efficient output. f. Assuming that no attempt is made to monitor or regulate the pollution, which market structure yields higher social welfare? Discuss.

The demand for cigarettes is given by \(P=500-.2 Q\). Cigarettes are manufactured at a constant marginal \(\operatorname{cost}\) of 50 and sold in a competitive market. a. What is the quantity of cigarettes sold in equilibrium? b. If cigarettes generate a marginal external cost of \(\mathrm{MEC}=.1 Q,\) what is the socially optimal level of cigarettes? c. Draw a diagram illustrating the private and social MC curves and the demand curve. Point out the private market quantity, the socially optimal quantity, and the social welfare cost.

Assume that scientific studies provide you with the following information concerning the benefits and costs of sulfur dioxide emissions: Benefits of abating (reducing) emissions: \(M B=500-20 A\) costs of abating emissions: \(M C=200+5 A\) where \(A\) is the quantity abated in millions of tons and the benefits and costs are given in dollars per ton. a. What is the socially efficient level of emissions abatement? b. What are the marginal benefit and marginal cost of abatement at the socially efficient level of abatement? c. What happens to net social benefits (benefits minus costs if you abate one million more tons than the efficient level? One million fewer? d. Why is it socially efficient to set marginal benefits equal to marginal costs rather than abating until total benefits equal total costs?

There are three groups in a community. Their demand curves for public television in hours of programming, \(T,\) are given respectively by \\[\begin{array}{l} W_{1}=\$ 200-T \\ W_{2}=\$ 240-2 T \\ W_{3}=\$ 320-2 T \end{array}\\] Suppose public television is a pure public good that can be produced at a constant marginal cost of \(\$ 200\) per hour a. What is the efficient number of hours of public television? b. How much public television would a competitive private market provide?
See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free