A firm is considering two policies to increase worker output. The first policy would involve an increased wage described as an incentive for workers to increase their effort. The second policy is to announce a voluntary bonus for those workers whose effort is deemed to be extraordinary. Using insights from behavioral economics, which policy do you believe will be the more effective?

Short Answer

Expert verified
According to insights from behavioral economics, the more effective policy is likely to be the second one: offering a voluntary bonus for extraordinary work. It capitalizes on behavioral insights like prospect theory and competition among workers.

Step by step solution

01

Analyze the first policy

The first policy being considered involves an increased wage as an incentive for workers. On the surface, this seems like a good plan. People generally work to earn money, and knowing that they could earn more might motivate them to work harder. However, it's worth noting that this approach might lose effectiveness over time. Assuming the increase is not massive, workers could eventually start viewing the raised salary as the new normal, causing the motivation to wane.
02

Analyze the second policy

The second policy involves providing a voluntary bonus to those workers who put in 'extraordinary' effort. This approach builds on several psychological factors. One is the prospect theory, which posits that people value a gain that is seen as a potential more highly than an actual gain. Secondly, the bonus creates an element of competition which can also act as motivation. Finally, the bonus, being 'extraordinary', is seen as a reward for effort beyond the standard, which can make the workers feel valued and appreciated.
03

Compare the policies

Comparatively, though both policies have possible positives, the second policy seems to have more potential to increase worker output. It capitalizes on behavioral insights like prospect theory and takes advantage of the competitive spirits. Of course, overall effectiveness could still depend on the particular situation and people involved.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Petroleum firms drill for oil in the Gulf Coast. Accidents on oil rigs that cause spills impose a negative externality on the inhabitants of the Gulf Coast states. Identify two ways oil drilling and its harmful effects could be reduced using your knowledge of externalities and behavioral economics.

Using your knowledge of behavioral economics, explain why many people choose to have low deductibles on their automobile insurance policies.

The demand curve for Uber weekday rides in certain city is described by the following equation: \(Q=50-P .\) An average ride costs \(\$ 25 .\) However during weekend nights the demand for rides increases dramatically and thus the new demand curve is: \(Q=100-P .\) As a result, Uber implements a surge price that is twice the price of an average ride, or \(\$ 50\) a. Graph the demand curves and determine the quantity of rides demanded during weekdays and on weekend nights based on the above prices. Label the graph with the prices and quantities. b. Now imagine that Uber riders are only willing to pay up to \(\$ 40\) instead of \(\$ 50\) during surge hours. Explain the reasoning behind this consumer behavior and draw the new demand curve for weekend nights. Can Uber still charge the surge price of \(\$ 50 ?\) c. Does this change in the demand curve affect Uber's profits during weekend nights? If so, what is the overall gain or loss?

There have been some claims in recent years that the increase in law school tuition (and the perceived value of a law school education) is a bubble. Do you agree with this statement? Why or why not?

Suppose that you are advising the Department of Energy on the best way to reduce energy consumption through home insulation. It has offered individuals a tax credit based on the magnitude of the payments made to install additional insulation in the attic, but the tax credit program has had only limited success. It has been asked to consider subsidizing insulation companies for a portion of the cost of clearing attics of unwanted items. Using your understanding of behavioral economics and public policy, analyze the pros and cons of the attic clearing program.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free