From time to time, Congress has raised the minimum wage. Some people suggested that a government subsidy could help employers finance the higher wage. This exercise examines the economics of a minimum wage and wage subsidies. Suppose the supply of lowskilled labor is given by \\[ L^{s}=10 w \\] where \(L^{5}\) is the quantity of low-skilled labor (in millions of persons employed each year), and \(w\) is the wage rate (in dollars per hour). The demand for labor is given by \\[ L^{D}=80-10 w \\] a. What will be the free-market wage rate and employment level? Suppose the government sets a minimum wage of \(\$ 5\) per hour. How many people would then be employed? b. Suppose that instead of a minimum wage, the government pays a subsidy of \(\$ 1\) per hour for each employee. What will the total level of employment be now? What will the equilibrium wage rate be?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The free-market wage rate is $4 per hour and employment level is 40 million. With a minimum wage of $5 per hour, 10 million people are unemployed. If the government pays a $1 subsidy per hour instead, the wage rate reaches $4.5 per hour and the total employment increases to 45 million.

Step by step solution

01

Find the equilibrium under free market conditions

Set the supply and demand equations to each other: \(10w = 80 - 10w\). Solve for \(w\) to find the free-market wage rate. Substituting \(w\) into either of the equations gives the employment level.
02

Calculate employment level under a minimum wage

Here, the wage rate \(w\) is set to 5. Substitute this into the supply and demand equations to get the corresponding labor quantities. The difference between these two quantities is the number of unemployed persons.
03

Analyze the effect of a subsidy

The subsidy reduces the wage rate by $1. Thus, substitute \(w-1\) into both supply and demand equations to account for this change. Next, solve these new equations for equilibrium. This will give the employment level and equilibrium wage rate after the subsidy.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Labor Supply and Demand
Understanding labor supply and demand is essential when examining the effects of changes in minimum wage or the implementation of government subsidies. In essence, the labor supply represents the total number of workers willing to work at a given wage rate, while labor demand represents the number of workers that employers are willing to hire at that wage.

In our exercise, the supply of low-skilled labor is mathematically represented as \( L^{s}=10w \), meaning that as the wage increases, more individuals are willing to work. Conversely, the demand for labor is given by the equation \( L^{D}=80-10w \), indicating that higher wages lead to fewer jobs offered by employers as the cost of labor increases.

This interrelationship of supply and demand determines the equilibrium wage rate and employment levels in a free market, without government interventions such as a minimum wage or subsidies.
Equilibrium Wage Rate
The equilibrium wage rate is found where the labor supply equals the labor demand. It represents the wage rate at which the number of workers willing to work is exactly matched by the number of jobs available.

As per the step by step solution, by setting \(10w = 80 - 10w\), we find the equilibrium wage rate for the free market. Solving for \(w\) reveals that at the equilibrium wage rate, there is no surplus of labor (unemployment) and no shortage of labor (unfilled jobs). This is a key concept in microeconomic theory, demonstrating how prices (in this case, wages) adjust to balance supply and demand.
Government Subsidy
A government subsidy provided to employers for each hour worked by an employee can impact the labor market in various ways. In the exercise, a subsidy of \($1\) per hour would effectively reduce the wage the employer has to pay.

This reduction in labor costs can stimulate demand for workers and potentially increase the overall employment level, as it becomes less expensive for employers to hire. The subsidy acts like a shift in the demand curve, as it raises the wage that workers receive and also increases the quantity of labor demanded without raising the cost to employers.
Employment Level
The employment level in an economy is the number of employed workers at a given time. According to the exercise, when government sets a minimum wage that is above the equilibrium wage rate, it can lead to unemployment because the quantity of labor supplied exceeds the quantity demanded.

On the other hand, if the government provides a subsidy, it can increase the employment level as the gap between what employers pay and what workers receive is bridged by the subsidy. The employment level is a crucial indicator of economic health and is significantly influenced by various factors, including minimum wage policies and government subsidies.
Microeconomic Theory
Microeconomic theory delves into the behavior of individuals and firms in making decisions regarding the allocation of scarce resources. It provides frameworks to predict and analyze how prices form in markets and how those prices influence decision-making.

In the context of the minimum wage and government subsidies, microeconomic theory explains how wage rates and employment levels respond to these policies. It helps in understanding that setting a minimum wage above the equilibrium wage rate can lead to excess supply of labor, while subsidies can offset this effect by encouraging higher employment levels without directly affecting the wage rate paid by employers.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The domestic supply and demand curves for hula beans are as follows: \\[ \begin{aligned} \text {Supply:} & P=50+Q \\ \text {Demand:} & P=200-2 Q \end{aligned} \\] where \(P\) is the price in cents per pound and \(Q\) is the quantity in millions of pounds. The U.S. is a small producer in the world hula bean market, where the current price (which will not be affected by anything we do) is 60 cents per pound. Congress is considering a tariff of 40 cents per pound. Find the domestic price of hula beans that will result if the tariff is imposed. Also compute the dollar gain or loss to domestic consumers, domestic producers, and government revenue from the tariff.

Suppose the market for widgets can be described by the following equations: \\[ \begin{array}{cl} \text { Demand: } & P=10-Q \\ \text { Supply: } & P=Q-4 \end{array} \\] where \(P\) is the price in dollars per unit and \(Q\) is the quantity in thousands of units. Then: a. What is the equilibrium price and quantity? b. Suppose the government imposes a tax of \(\$ 1\) per unit to reduce widget consumption and raise government revenues. What will the new equilibrium quantity be? What price will the buyer pay? What amount per unit will the seller receive? c. Suppose the government has a change of heart about the importance of widgets to the happiness of the American public. The tax is removed and a subsidy of \(\$ 1\) per unit granted to widget producers. What will the equilibrium quantity be? What price will the buyer pay? What amount per unit (including the subsidy) will the seller receive? What will be the total cost to the government?

A particular metal is traded in a highly competitive world market at a world price of \(\$ 9\) per ounce. Unlimited quantities are available for import into the United States at this price. The supply of this metal from domestic U.S. mines and mills can be represented by the equation \(Q^{S}=2 / 3 P\), where \(Q^{S}\) is U.S. output in million ounces and \(P\) is the domestic price. The demand for the metal in the United States is \(Q^{D}=40-2 P,\) where \(Q^{\mathrm{D}}\) is the domestic demand in million ounces. In recent years the U.S. industry has been protected by a tariff of \(\$ 9\) per ounce. Under pressure from other foreign governments, the United States plans to reduce this tariff to zero. Threatened by this change, the U.S. industry is seeking a voluntary restraint agreement that would limit imports into the United States to 8 million ounces per year. a. Under the \(\$ 9\) tariff, what was the U.S. domestic price of the metal? b. If the United States eliminates the tariff and the voluntary restraint agreement is approved, what will be the U.S. domestic price of the metal?

Among the tax proposals regularly considered by Congress is an additional tax on distilled liquors. The tax would not apply to beer. The price elasticity of supply of liquor is \(4.0,\) and the price elasticity of demand is \(-0.2 .\) The cross-elasticity of demand for beer with respect to the price of liquor is 0.1 a. If the new tax is imposed, who will bear the greater burden-liquor suppliers or liquor consumers? Why? b. Assuming that beer supply is infinitely elastic, how will the new tax affect the beer market?

About 100 million pounds of jelly beans are consumed in the United States each year, and the price has been about 50 cents per pound. However, jelly bean producers feel that their incomes are too low and have convinced the government that price supports are in order. The government will therefore buy up as many jelly beans as necessary to keep the price at \(\$ 1\) per pound. However, government economists are worried about the impact of this program because they have no estimates of the elasticities of jelly bean demand or supply. a. Could this program cost the government more than \(\$ 50\) million per year? Under what conditions? Could it cost less than \(\$ 50\) million per year? Under what conditions? Illustrate with a diagram. b. Could this program cost consumers (in terms of lost consumer surplus) more than \(\$ 50\) million per year? Under what conditions? Could it cost consumers less than \(\$ 50\) million per year? Under what conditions? Again, use a diagram to illustrate.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free