Question: There have been some claims in recent years that the increase in law school tuition (and the perceived value of a law school education) is a bubble. Do you agree with this statement? Why or why not?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The increase in law school tuition is not a bubble because the investment may or may not yield positive returns based on the perceived value of the law school education.

Step by step solution

01

Meaning and concept of bubble

A bubble for any sector, business, or economic activity arises when people invest more and more in the project, believing that it will yield positive returns. It generally happens when people start overestimating the rate of return from the bubble. It may happen to a positive response or informational cascade in the early chain of investments.

For example, a sudden increase in the stock prices of many internet companies during 1995-2000 is a bubble. Many investors believed that internet companies would always grow due to the unparallel and limitless potential of the internet and virtual world. It pulled investments heavily in the IT sector and created the bubble.

02

Explanation for the answer

Rising law school tuition cannot be a bubble because there is no guarantee that law school education will always yield benefits. The success in the profession of law depends on the candidate's practice after the official education. It yields positive returns for some and negative returns for others. There is not much evidence to prove the success of law school tuition.

Thus, the false belief does not significantly impact the demand for investments in law school tuition. Thus, the increase in law school tuition is not a bubble.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Question: Suppose there are two types of e-book consumers: 100 "standard" consumers with demand Q = 20 - P and 100 "rule of thumb" consumers who buy 10 e-books only if the price is less than $10. (Their demand curve is given by Q = 10 if P < 10 and Q = 0 if P ≥ 10). Draw the resulting total demand curve for e-books. How has the "rule of thumb" behavior affected the elasticity of demand for e-books?

Question: In the U.S. and a number of other countries, individuals wishing to make organ donations at the end of their life have to “opt-in,” i.e., to affirmatively agree to be a donor. In contrast, a host of other countries have an “optout” policy, whereby you have to explicitly state that you do not wish to be a donor to reject the organ donation option. Can you use your knowledge of behavioral economics to explain the empirical phenomenon that organ donation rates are substantially higher in opt-out countries than in opt-in countries?

Question: Suppose that you are advising the Department of Energy on the best way to reduce energy consumption through home insulation. It has offered individuals a tax credit based on the magnitude of the payments made to install additional insulation in the attic, but the tax credit program has had only limited success. It has been asked to consider subsidizing insulation companies for a portion of the cost of clearing attics of unwanted items. Using your understanding of behavioral economics and public policy, analyze the pros and cons of the attic clearing program.

Question: A firm is considering two policies to increase worker output. The first policy would involve an increased wage described as an incentive for workers to increase their effort. The second policy is to announce a voluntary bonus for those workers whose effort is deemed to be extraordinary. Using insights from behavioral economics, which policy do you believe will be the more effective?

Question: Using your knowledge of behavioral economics, explain why many people choose to have low deductibles on their automobile insurance policies.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free