In the context of our analysis of the Edgeworth production box, suppose that a new invention changes a constant-returns-to-scale food production process into one that exhibits sharply increasing returns. How does this change affect the production contract curve?

Short Answer

Expert verified

If a new invention would change the constant returns to scale to increasing return to scale, this will not affect the production contract curve.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. No effect on the production contract curve

We know that an Edgeworth production box depicts the production contract curve, which results from tangency between the different points on the isoquants of the individual production processes.

If supposedly there is a change from a constant-returns-to-scale production process to a sharply-increasing-returns-to-scale due to a new invention, this will not necessarily change the shape of the isoquants. It is because the marginal productivity of the inputs will remain the same, there will be no change in the marginal rate of technical substitution.

We know that the shape of the contract curve depends upon the marginal rate of technical substitution between two goods. Since we have already established that the MRTS will not change due to change in return from constant to increasing, we could conclude that the shape of the production contract curve would remain the same, and there will be no effect of this change.

For example: Consider Y=LK changes to Y=L2K2

In both cases, the MRTS=K/L, hence there is no change in the production contract curve.

The change can be seen only because of the change in the trade-off between the used inputs (affecting the shape of isoquant)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Fill in the missing information in the following tables.

For each table, use the information provided to identify a possible trade. Then identify the final allocation and a possible value for the MRS at the efficient solution. (Note:There is more than one correct answer.) Illustrate your results using Edgeworth box diagrams.

a. Norman’s MRS of food for clothing is 1 and Gina’s MRS of food for clothing is 4:

Individual

Initial Allocation

Trade

Final Allocation

Norman

6F, 2C



Gina

1F, 8C



b. Michael’s MRS of food for clothing is 1/2 and Kelly’s MRS of food for clothing is 3.

Individual

Initial Allocation

Trade

Final Allocation

Michael

10F, 3C



Kelly

5F, 15C



Give an example of conditions when the production possibilities frontier might not be concave.

Using general equilibrium analysis, and taking into account feedback effects, analyze the following:

a. The likely effects of outbreaks of disease on chicken farms on the markets for chicken and pork.

b. The effects of increased taxes on airline tickets on travel to major tourist destinations such as Florida and California and on the hotel rooms in those destinations.

Suppose gold (G) and silver (S) are substitutes for each other because both serve as hedges against inflation. Suppose also that the supplies of both are fixed in the short run (QG= 75 andQS= 300) and that the demandsfor gold and silver are given by the following

equations:

PG= 975 -QG+ 0.5PSandPS= 600 -QS+ 0.5PG.

a. What are the equilibrium prices of gold and silver?

b. What if a new discovery of gold doubles the quantity supplied to 150? How will this discovery affect the prices of both gold and silver?

A monopsonist buys labor for less than the competitive wage. What type of inefficiency will this use of monopsony power cause? How would your answer change if the monopsonist in the labor market were also a monopolist in the output market?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free