Suppose that two competing firms, A and B, produce a homogeneous good. Both firms have a marginal cost of MC = \(50. Describe what would happen to output and price in each of the following situations if the firms are at (i) Cournot equilibrium, (ii) collusive equilibrium, and (iii) Bertrand equilibrium.

(a) Because Firm A must increase wages, its MC increases to \)80.

(b) The marginal cost of both firms increases.

(c) The demand curve shifts to the right.

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) The market output will reduce, and the price will increase in Cournot equilibrium.

In Collusive equilibrium, the market output and price will remain the same.

In Bertrand equilibrium, the market output will fall, and the market price will increase.

(b) The market output will reduce, and the price will increase in Cournot equilibrium.

In Collusive equilibrium, the market output will fall, and the price will increase.

In Bertrand equilibrium, the market output will fall, and the market price will increase.

(c) The market output will increase, and the price will rise in Cournot equilibrium.

In Collusive equilibrium, the market output will increase, and the price will increase.

In Bertrand equilibrium, the market output will increase, and the market price will not change.

Step by step solution

01

Explanation for part (a)

In Cournot equilibrium, the reaction curve of firm 1 will shift inward; thus, the output will fall, and firm B will produce more,taking some share of firm A. Thus, the total market output will fall, and the price in the market will increase.

In Collusive equilibrium, as the marginal cost of firm A increases, firm A will produce zero, and all the output will produce by firm B; hence, there will be no change in market output and price.

In Bertrand equilibrium, the price is equal to price; thus, firm A price will increase, and firm B will sell at a price lower than firm A; thus, taking all the output of firm A. Hence, with the price rise, market output falls.

02

Explanation for part (b)

In Cournot equilibrium, after the increase in marginal cost, the firm's output will fall; thus, total output will fall, and the market price will increase.

In Collusive equilibrium, the market output will fall, and the price will increase as the marginal cost increases.

In Bertrand equilibrium, as the marginal cost increases, the price increases; thus, the output will fall.

03

Explanation for part (c)

After the rightward shift in the demand curve, the output produced by both firms will increase; thus, the total output will increase, and the price increases in Cournot equilibrium.

In Collusive equilibrium, the marginal revenue increases with demand; thus, both output and price will also increase.

In Bertrand equilibrium, the rise in demand will increase total output, but the marginal cost does not change; thus, the market price will not change.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

You are an executive for Super Computer, Inc. (SC), which rents out supercomputers. SC receives a fixed rental payment per time period in exchange for the right to unlimited computing at a rate of P cents per second. SC has two types of potential customers of equal number—10 businesses and 10 academic institutions. Each business customer has the demand function Q = 10 - P, where Q is in millions of seconds per month; each academic institution has the demand Q = 8 - P. The marginal cost to SC of additional computing is 2 cents per second, regardless of volume.

  1. Suppose that you could separate business and academic customers. What rental fee and usage fee would you charge each group? What would be your profits?
  2. Suppose you were unable to keep the two types of customers separate and charged a zero rental fee. What usage fee would maximize your profits? What would be your profits?
  3. Suppose you set up one two-part tariff—that is, you set one rental and one usage fee that both business and academic customers pay. What usage and rental fees would you set? What would be your profits? Explain why the price would not be equal to marginal cost.

Many retail video stores offer two alternative plans for renting films:

• A two-part tariff: Pay an annual membership fee (e.g., \(40) and then pay a small fee for the daily rental of each film (e.g., \)2 per film per day).

• A straight rental fee: Pay no membership fee, but pay a higher daily rental fee (e.g., $4 per film per day).

What is the logic behind the two-part tariff in this case? Why offer the customer a choice of two plans rather than simply a two-part tariff?

Consider a firm with monopoly power that faces the demand curve

P= 100 - 3Q+ 4A1/2

and has the total cost function

C= 4Q2 + 10Q+ A

where Ais the level of advertising expenditures, and Pand Qare price and output.

a.Find the values of A, Q, and Pthat maximize the firm’s profit.

b.Calculate the Lerner index, L = (P - MC)/P, for this firm at its profit-maximizing levels of A, Q, and P.

A cable TV company offers, in addition to its basic service, two products: a Sports Channel (Product 1) and a Movie Channel (Product 2). Subscribers to the basic service can subscribe to these additional services individually at the monthly prices P1 and P2, respectively, or they can buy the two as a bundle for the price PB, where PB 6 P1 + P2. They can also forgo the additional services and simply buy the basic service. The company’s marginal cost for these additional services is zero. Through market research, the cable company has estimated the reservation prices for these two services for a representative group of consumers in the company’s service area. These reservation prices are plotted (as x’s) in Figure 11.21, as are the prices P1, P2, and PB that the cable company is currently charging. The graph is divided into regions I, II, III, and IV.

a. Which products, if any, will be purchased by the consumers in region I? In region II? In region III? In region IV? Explain briefly.

b. Note that as drawn in the figure, the reservation prices for the Sports Channel and the Movie Channel are negatively correlated. Why would you, or why would you not, expect consumers’ reservation prices for cable TV channels to be negatively correlated?

c. The company’s vice president has said: “Because the marginal cost of providing an additional channel is zero, mixed bundling offers no advantage over pure bundling. Our profits would be just as high if we offered the Sports Channel and the

Movie Channel together as a bundle, and only as a bundle.” Do you agree or disagree? Explain why.

d. Suppose the cable company continues to use mixed bundling to sell these two services. Based on the distribution of reservation prices shown in Figure 11.21, do you think the cable company should alter any of the prices that it is now charging? If so, how?

As the owner of the only tennis club in an isolated wealthy community, you must decide on membership dues and fees for court time. There are two types of tennis players. “Serious” players have demand

Q1 - 10 - P

where Q1 is court hours per week and P is the fee per hour for each individual player. There are also “occasional” players with demand

Q2 = 4 - 0.25P

Assume that there are 1000 players of each type. Because you have plenty of courts, the marginal cost of court time is zero. You have fixed costs of $10,000 per week. Serious and occasional players look alike, so you must charge them the same prices.

  1. Suppose that to maintain a “professional” atmosphere, you want to limit membership to serious players. How should you set the annual membership dues and court fees (assume 52 weeks per year) to maximize profits, keeping in mind the constraint that only serious players choose to join? What would profits be (per week)?
  2. A friend tells you that you could make greater profits by encouraging both types of players to join. Is your friend right? What annual dues and court fees would maximize weekly profits? What would these profits be?
  3. Suppose that over the years, young, upwardly mobile professionals move to your community, all of whom are serious players. You believe there are now 3000 serious players and 1000 occasional players. Would it still be profitable to cater to the occasional player? What would be the profit-maximizing annual dues and court fees? What would profits be per week?
See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free