Do the following functions exhibit increasing, constant, or decreasing returns to scale? What happens to the marginal product of each individual factor as that factor is increased and the other factor held constant?

a. q = 3L + 2K

b. q = (2L + 2K)1/2

c. q = 3LK2

d. q = L1/2K1/2

e. q = 4L1/2 + 4K

Short Answer

Expert verified

a. The production function shows constant returns to scale and constant marginal factor productivity.

b. The production function shows decreasing returns to scale and diminishing marginal factor productivity.

c. The production function shows increasing returns to scale and constant marginal factor productivity.

b. The production function shows constant returns to scale and diminishing marginal factor productivity.

e. The production function shows decreasing returns to scale, the marginal productivity of capital remains constant and marginal productivity of labor falls.

Step by step solution

01

Explanation for part (a)  

The production function is,

q = 3L + 2K

Now multiply both capital land labor by 3, i..e. K’ = 3K and L’ = 3L. So, the output becomes:

q' = 9L + 6K

= 3 x (3L + 2K)

= 3q

Here, it is observed that as each input is increased by a factor of 3, the output level also increases by a factor of 3. Hence, the production function exhibits constant returns to scale (CRS).

In the original production function, the marginal product of capital (when labor is held fixed) is 2. The second-order derivative of MPK is zero. Thus as the capital increases, MPK does not change.

The marginal product of labor is 3. The second-order derivative of MPL is zero. Thus as the labor increases, MPL does not change.

02

Explanation for part (b)

The production function is,

q = (2L + 2K)1/2

Now both capital and labor increase by a factor of 3, i.e. K’ = 3K and L’ = 3L. So,

q' = (6L + 6K)1/2

=6×L+K1/2=6q

Here, it is observed that as each input is increased by a factor of 3, the output level also increases by less than the factor of 3. Hence, the production function exhibits diminishing returns to scale (DRS).

The marginal product of capital (when labor is held fixed) is

qK=22(2L+2K)1/2

Since K is in the denominator, as K increases, the MPK decreases.

The marginal product of labor is similarly

qL=22(2L+2K)1/2

Since L is in the denominator, as L increases, the MPL decreases.

Thus, both MPK and MPL decrease as the employment of capital and labor rise, respectively.

03

Explanation for part (c )

The production function is,

q =3 LK2

Now both capital and labor increase by a factor of λ, i..e. K’ = λK and L’ = λL. So,

q'=3λLλK2=λ3·(3LK2)=λ3·q

Here, it is observed that as each input is increased by a factor of λ, the output level increases by more than a factor of λ. Hence, the production function exhibits increasing returns to scale (IRS).

The marginal product of capital is 6LK, so the MPK increases when K increases.

The marginal product of labor is 3K2, so the MPL is constant.

04

Explanation for part (d)  

The production function is,

q =L1/2 K1/2

Now both capital and labor increase by a factor of λ, i.e. K’ = λK and L’ = λL. So,

q'=(λL)1/2λK1/2 =λL1/2K1/2

Here, it is observed that as each input is increased by a factor of λ, the output level also increases by a factor of λ. Hence, the production function exhibits constant returns to scale (CRS).

The marginal product of capital is

L1/22K1/2

The MPK decreases as K increases.

The marginal product of labor is

K1/22L1/2

The MPL decreases as L increases.

Thus, both MPK and MPL decrease as the employment of capital and labor rise, respectively.

05

Explanation for part (e)

The production function is,

q =4L1/2 + 4K

Now both capital and labor increase by a factor of λ, i.e. K’ = λK and L’ = λL. So,

q'=4(λL)1/2+4λK<λ(4L1/2+4K)

Here, it is observed that as each input is increased by a factor of λ, the output level increases by less than a factor of λ. Hence, the production function exhibits decreasing returns to scale (DRS).

The marginal product of capital is 4, which is constant.

The marginal product of labor is 2L1/2,

so the MPL decreases as L increases.

Thus, MPK remains constant while MPL decreases as the employment of capital and labor rise, respectively.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The marginal product of labor in the production of computer chips is 50 chips per hour. The marginal rate of technical substitution of hours of labor for hours of machine capital is 1/4. What is the marginal product of capital?

For each of the following examples, draw a representative isoquant. What can you say about the marginal rate of technical substitution in each case?

a. A firm can hire only full-time employees to produce its output, or it can hire some combination of fulltime and part-time employees. For each full-time worker let go, the firm must hire an increasing number of temporary employees to maintain the same level of output.

b. A firm finds that it can always trade two units of labor for one unit of capital and still keep output constant.

c. A firm requires exactly two full-time workers to operate each piece of machinery in the factory

A firm has a production process in which the inputs to production are perfectly substitutable in the long run. Can you tell whether the marginal rate of technical substitution is high or low, or is further information necessary? Discuss.

A political campaign manager must decide whether to emphasize television advertisements or letters to potential voters in a reelection campaign. Describe the production function for campaign votes. How might information about this function (such as the shape of the isoquants) help the campaign manager to plan strategy?

Fill in the gaps in the table below.

Quantity of variable input
Total output
Marginal product of variable input
Average product of variable input
00

1225

2

300
3
300
41140

5
225
6

225
See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free