Example 9.6 (page 353) describes the effects of the sugar quota. In 2016, imports were limited to 6.1 billion pounds, which pushed the domestic price to 27 cents per pound. Suppose imports were expanded to 10 billion pounds.

a. What would be the new U.S. domestic price?

b. How much would consumers gain and domestic producers lose?

c. What would be the effect on deadweight loss and foreign producers?

Short Answer

Expert verified
  1. The new U.S. domestic price would be 23.92 cents.

  2. Consumers would gain 2.29 billion pounds, and producers will lose 9.83 billion pounds.

  3. The deadweight loss will reduce, and foreign producers will be benefitted from this policy.

Step by step solution

01

Calculating the new U.S. domestic price.

The government increases the quantity of imports to 10 billion pounds. Import is the difference between the quantity demanded and quantity supplied. The new U.S. domestic price will be determined by equating the quantity of imports with the difference between quantity demanded and quantity supplied.

QuantityDemanded-QuantitySupplied=Imports31.20-0.27P--8.95+0.99P=1031.20+8.95-10=0.27P+0.99PP=23.92

The new U.S. domestic price will be 423.92 cents.

02

Step 2. Gain to consumers and loss to producers.

Gain to consumers: The gain to consumers is equal to the product of an increase in quantity demand and an amount of reduction in the price level. The increase in quantity demand and reduction in price level is calculated below:

NewDemand=31.20-0.2723.92=31.20-6.46=24.74

IncreaseinQuantitydemand=NewDemandedQuantity-OldDemandedQuantity=24.74-24=0.74Reductioninpricelevel=NewPrice-PreviousPrice=27.02-23.92=3.1

The gain to consumers is calculated by multiplying the reduction price level and increased quantity of demand at the new price level:

Gaintoconsumers=ReducedPrice×IncreasedDemand=3.1××0.74=2.29

03

Step 3. Impact on deadweight loss and foreign producers.

The increase in imports has reduced the gap between the U.S. domestic sugar prices in the world market. It will reduce the loss to society because of import restrictions. Thus, the deadweight loss will decrease.

The increase in the quantity of imports will allow foreign producers to sell more sugar in the U.S. market. Since the price of sugar of foreign producers is lower than the price of sugar supplied by U.S. producers, the consumers will consume the increased quantity of imports. Hence, the foreign producers will gain more returns because they can sell more quantity in the U.S. market.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In Exercise 4 in Chapter 2 (page 84), we examined a vegetable fiber traded in a competitive world market and imported into the United States at a world price of \(9 per pound. U.S. domestic supply and demand for various price levels are shown in the following table.

Price

U.S. Supply (Million Pounds)

U.S. Demand (Million Pounds)

3

2

34

6

4

28

9

6

22

12

8

16

15

10

10

18

12

4

Answer the following questions about the U.S. market:

a. Confirm that the demand curve is given by QD = 40 - 2P, and that the supply curve is given by QS = 2/3P.

b. Confirm that if there were no restrictions on trade, the United States would import 16 million pounds.

c. If the United States imposes a tariff of \)3 per pound, what will be the U.S. price and level of imports? How much revenue will the government earn from the tariff? How large is the deadweight loss?

d. If the United States has no tariff but imposes an import quota of 8 million pounds, what will be the U.S. domestic price? What is the cost of this quota for U.S. consumers of fiber? What is the gain for U.S. producers?

Why have recent successive UK governments prefferred a PFI over PPPs?

What are the features of privatization when being implemented on a state owend firm?

In Example 9.1 (page 332), we calculated the gains and losses from price controls on natural gas and found that there was a deadweight loss of \(5.68 billion. This calculation was based on a price of oil of \)50 per barrel.

a. If the price of oil were \(60 per barrel, what would be the free-market price of gas? How large a deadweight loss would result if the maximum allowable price of natural gas were \)3.00 per thousand cubic feet?

b. What price of oil would yield a free-market price of natural gas of $3?

Currently, the social security payroll tax in the United States is evenly divided between employers and employees. Employers must pay the government a tax of 6.2 percent of the wages they pay, and employees must pay 6.2 percent of the wages they receive. Suppose the tax were changed so that employers paid the full 12.4 percent and employees paid nothing. Would employees be better off?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free