Currently, the social security payroll tax in the United States is evenly divided between employers and employees. Employers must pay the government a tax of 6.2 percent of the wages they pay, and employees must pay 6.2 percent of the wages they receive. Suppose the tax were changed so that employers paid the full 12.4 percent and employees paid nothing. Would employees be better off?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The employees will not be better off.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Meaning of ‘payroll tax’

Payroll tax refers to the tax levied on the payroll of an employer. The employers withhold it by deducting a certain percentage of wages paid to employees. Employers then deposit this amount to the government as tax.

02

Step 2. Impact on employees if employers pay the full amount of tax

The government decides to charge 12.4 percent payroll tax from the employers instead of the half from the employers and half from the employees of the tax. The shift of tax on employers will not be beneficial for employees because the employers will reduce the wage rate of employees.

The employers will react to the government’s decision to shift the whole payroll tax on them by reducing the wage rate given to its employees. They will deduct the extra 6.2 percent from employees' wages to compensate for the extra tax burden. Hence, the employees will not be better-off.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Japanese rice producers have extremely high production costs, due in part to the high opportunity cost of land and to their inability to take advantage of economies of large-scale production. Analyze two policies intended to maintain Japanese rice production:

(1) a per-pound subsidy to farmers for each pound of rice produced, or

(2) a per-pound tariff on imported rice.

Illustrate with supply-and-demand diagrams the equilibrium price and quantity, domestic rice production, government revenue or deficit, and deadweight loss from each policy. Which policy is the Japanese government likely to prefer? Which policy is Japanese farmers likely to prefer?

A particular metal is traded in a highly competitive world market at a world price of \(9 per ounce.

Unlimited quantities are available for import into the United States at this price. The supply of this metal from domestic U.S. mines and mills can be represented by the equation QS = 2/3P, where QS is U.S. output in million ounces and P is the domestic price.

The demand for the metal in the United States is QD = 40 - 2P, where QD is the domestic demand in million ounces.

In recent years the U.S. industry has been protected by a tariff of \)9 per ounce. Under pressure from other foreign governments, the United States plans to reduce this tariff to zero. Threatened by this change, the U.S. industry is seeking a voluntary restraint agreement that would limit imports into the United States to 8 million ounces per year.

a. Under the $9 tariff, what was the U.S. domestic price of the metal?

b. If the United States eliminates the tariff and the voluntary restraint agreement is approved, what will be the U.S. domestic price of the metal?

How does a change in technology affect the demand for labor?

Among the tax proposals regularly considered by Congress is an additional tax on distilled liquors. The tax would not apply to beer. The price elasticity of supply of liquor is 4.0, and the price elasticity of demand is -0.2. The cross-elasticity of demand for beer with respect to the price of liquor is 0.1.

a. If the new tax is imposed, who will bear the greater burden—liquor suppliers or liquor consumers? Why?

b. Assuming that beer supply is infinitely elastic, how will the new tax affect the beer market?

Example 9.6 (page 353) describes the effects of the sugar quota. In 2016, imports were limited to 6.1 billion pounds, which pushed the domestic price to 27 cents per pound. Suppose imports were expanded to 10 billion pounds.

a. What would be the new U.S. domestic price?

b. How much would consumers gain and domestic producers lose?

c. What would be the effect on deadweight loss and foreign producers?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free