The following table shows total output (in tax returns completed per day) of the accounting firm of Hoodwink and Finagle: $$\begin{array}{cc}\text { Number of } & \text { Number of Returns } \\\\\text { Accountants } & \text { per Day } \\\\\hline 0 & 0 \\\1 & 5 \\\2 & 12 \\\3 & 17 \\\4 & 20 \\\5 & 22\end{array}$$ Assuming the quantity of capital (computers, adding machines, desks, etc.) remains constant at all output levels: a. Calculate the marginal product of each accountant. b. Over what range of employment do you see increasing returns to labor? Diminishing returns? c. Explain why \(M P L\) might behave this way in the context of an accounting firm.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. The MPL for each accountant is: 1st accountant = 5, 2nd accountant = 7, 3rd accountant = 5, 4th accountant = 3, 5th accountant = 2.\nb. The range of employment with increasing returns to labor is from 0 to 2 accountants, and the range with diminishing returns to labor is from 2 to 5 accountants. \nc. The MPL behaves this way due to the law of diminishing returns. As more accountants are added to a fixed amount of capital, each accountant has less capital to work with, leading to smaller increases in output.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate MPL

The MPL can be calculated using the formula: MPL = Change in Total Output / Change in Labor. Based on the data in the table, the MPL for each additional accountant can be calculated as follows: for the 1st accountant, MPL = (5-0)/(1-0) = 5; for the 2nd accountant, MPL = (12-5)/(2-1) = 7; for the 3rd accountant, MPL = (17-12)/(3-2) = 5; for the 4th accountant, MPL = (20-17)/(4-3) = 3; for the 5th accountant, MPL = (22-20)/(5-4) = 2.
02

Identify the Range of Employment with Increasing and Diminishing Returns to Labor

The range of employment with increasing returns to labor is the range where the MPL is increasing, which is from 0 to 2 accountants. The range with diminishing returns to labor is the range where the MPL is decreasing, which is from 2 to 5 accountants.
03

Explain the Behavior of MPL

The MPL is behaving this way because of the law of diminishing returns, a principle stating that at some point, adding an additional unit of a variable input, holding all other inputs constant, will result in smaller increases in output. In an accounting firm, as more accountants are added to a fixed amount of capital, each accountant has less capital to work with, so the additional output produced by each accountant declines.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In a recent year, a long, hard winter gave rise to stronger-than-normal demand for heating oil. The following summer was characterized by strong demand for gasoline by vacationers. Show what these two events might have done to the short-run \(M C, A V C\) and \(A T C\) curves of Continental Airlines. (Hint: How would these events affect the price of oil?)

Draw the long-run total cost and long-run average cost curves for a firm that experiences: a. Constant returns to scale over all output levels. b. Diseconomies of scale over low levels of output, constant returns to scale over intermediate levels of output, and economies of scale over high output levels. Does this pattern of costs make sense? Why or why not?

Down On Our Luck Studios has spent \(\$ 100\) million producing an awful film, \(A\) Depressing Story About \(a\) Miserable Person. If the studio releases the film, the most cost-effective marketing plan would cost an additional \(\$ 5\) million, bringing the total amount spent to \(\$ 105\) million. Box office sales under this plan are predicted to be \(\$ 12\) million, which would be split evenly between the theaters and the studio. Additional studio revenue from video and DVD sales would be about \(\$ 2\) million. Should the studio release the film? If no, briefly explain why not. If yes, explain how it could make sense to release a film that cost \(\$ 105\) million but earns only \(\$ 12\) million.

The following table gives the short-run and long-run total costs for various levels of output of Consolidated National Acme, Inc.: $$\begin{array}{ccc}Q & T C_{1} & T C_{2} \\\\\hline 0 & 0 & 350 \\\1 & 300 & 400 \\\2 & 400 & 435 \\\3 & 465 & 465 \\\4 & 495 & 505 \\\5 & 540 & 560 \\\6 & 600 & 635 \\\7 & 700 & 735\end{array}$$ a. Which column, \(T C_{1}\) or \(T C_{2},\) gives long-run total cost, and which gives short-run total cost? How do you know? b. For each level of output, find short-run \(T F C\) \(T V C, A F C, A V C,\) and \(M C\) c. At what output level would the firm's short-run and long-run input mixes be the same? d. Starting from producing two units, Consolidated's managers decide to double production to four units. So they simply double all of their inputs in the long run. Comment on their managerial skills. e. Over what range of output do you see economies of scale? Diseconomies of scale? Constant returns to scale?

A study of immunizing children in poor countries against diphtheria, pertussis, and tetanus estimated that, in the long run, a \(10 \%\) increase in the number of children vaccinated increases the total cost of vaccinations by \(8.4 \% .\) According to this study: a. Is immunization over this range characterized by economies of scale, constant returns to scale, or diseconomies of scale? b. [more difficult] We can define long-run marginal cost (LRMC) as the cost of increasing output by one unit when all inputs can be varied (as they can be in the long run). Based on the study, at current vaccine levels, would LRMC for vaccinations be greater than, less than, or equal to long-run average total cost (LRATC)? Why? c. If we want to know what it will cost to vaccinate additional children, and we use "cost per vaccine" as given by the current LRATC, do we overestimate, underestimate, or accurately estimate the cost per additional vaccine?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free