What stops oligopolists from acting together as a monopolist and earning the highest possible level of profits?

Short Answer

Expert verified
In conclusion, oligopolists are prevented from acting together as a monopolist and earning the highest possible level of profits due to various factors such as legal restrictions, game theory strategies, non-collusive behavior, and price wars/competitive rivalry. These factors maintain a degree of competition within the oligopoly market, preventing firms from acting like monopolists.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Oligopoly

In an oligopoly market structure, there are a few large firms that dominate the market and produce similar goods or services. These firms have a high degree of market power, which means they have control over price and other factors affecting the market. One of the primary features of an oligopoly market is that each firm's actions have a noticeable impact on the competitors' behavior.
02

Monopoly vs Oligopoly

A monopoly market structure is characterized by a single firm that controls the entire market for a product or service. The monopolist can set high prices, restrict output, and earn maximum profits. In contrast, an oligopoly consists of a few large firms, and their pricing decisions depend on the reactions and strategies of their competitors. Although oligopolists have market power, they cannot maximize their profits like a monopolist, due to competition and interdependence among firms.
03

Factors Preventing Oligopolists from Acting as Monopolists

There are several factors that prevent oligopolists from acting together as a monopolist and earning the highest possible level of profits: 1. Legal Restrictions: Anti-trust laws and regulations prevent the formation of cartels or collusive behavior between competing firms. Such laws aim to maintain fair competition and prevent price-fixing, market sharing, or any other practices that would lead to monopolistic behavior. 2. Game Theory and Competitive Strategies: Each firm in an oligopoly is using different strategies to outperform their competitors, which leads to a situation where each one is trying to predict the other's behavior. Firms may follow a tit-for-tat strategy, where they match their competitors' moves, benefiting from short-term gains but potentially damaging long-term profitability. 3. Non-Collusive Oligopoly: Firms in an oligopoly might compete fiercely and do not collude or cooperate to fix prices, production levels, or other market factors. This type of market structure prevents firms from acting like a monopolist and earning maximum profits. 4. Price Wars and Competitive Rivalry: Intense competition may lead to firms lowering their prices to maintain or increase their market share. Price wars can significantly reduce profits and discourage collusion between firms.
04

Conclusion

In conclusion, while oligopolists have some market power and can influence price and output levels, they are prevented from acting together as a monopolist and earning the highest possible level of profits due to factors such as legal restrictions, game theory strategies, non-collusive behavior, and price wars/competitive rivalry. These factors ensure a certain level of competition persists, preventing monopolistic behavior in oligopoly markets.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Mary and Raj are the only two growers who provide organically grown corn to a local grocery store. They know that if they cooperated and produced less corn, they could raise the price of the corn. If they work independently, they will each earn \(100\)dollar. If they decide to work together and both lower their output, they can each earn \(150\). If one person lowers output and the other does not, the person who lowers output will earn \(0\)dollar and the other person will capture the entire market and will earn \(200\)dollar Table 10.6 represents the choices available to Mary and Raj. What is the best choice for Raj if he is sure that Mary will cooperate? If Mary thinks Raj will cheat, what should Mary do and why? What is the prisoner's dilemma result? What is the preferred choice if they could ensure cooperation? \(A=\) Work independently; \(\mathrm{B}=\) Cooperate and Lower Output. (Each results entry lists Raj's earnings first, and Mary's earnings second.)

Would you expect the kinked demand curve to be more extreme (like a right angle) or less extreme (like a normal demand curve) if each firm in the cartel produces a near-identical product like OPEC and petroleum? What if each firm produces a somewhat different product? Explain your reasoning.

Continuing with the scenario in question \(1,\) in the long run, the positive economic profits that the monopolistic competitor earns will attract a response either from existing firms in the industry or firms outside. As those firms capture the original firm's profit, what will happen to the original firm's profit-maximizing price and output levels?

Aside from advertising, how can monopolistically competitive firms increase demand for their products?

What is the relationship between product differentiation and monopolistic competition?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free