Would you expect the kinked demand curve to be more extreme (like a right angle) or less extreme (like a normal demand curve) if each firm in the cartel produces a near-identical product like OPEC and petroleum? What if each firm produces a somewhat different product? Explain your reasoning.

Short Answer

Expert verified
When firms in a cartel produce near-identical products, the kinked demand curve is more extreme, like a right angle, because the demand is highly sensitive to changes in price due to the high substitutability among the products. Conversely, when firms produce somewhat different products, the kinked demand curve is less extreme, resembling a normal demand curve, as the demand for any individual firm's product is less sensitive to changes in price due to factors such as product differentiation and brand loyalty.

Step by step solution

01

Scenario 1: Near-identical products

When firms in the cartel produce near-identical products, the demand for any individual firm's product is highly sensitive to changes in its price relative to other firms' prices. This is because consumers will switch to other cartel member's products if there is a slight price advantage, considering the products to be near-identical substitutes. In this case, if a firm tries to raise its price, it would lose a significant share of demand to the other cartel members. As a result, the firm's demand curve would be elastic in the segment above the kink (higher price range). Similarly, if any firm lowers its price, the other cartel members would react by reducing their prices to maintain their sales volume, as they also produce near-identical products. This leads to the demand for the original firm's product remaining largely unchanged. Therefore, the firm's demand curve would be inelastic in the segment below the kink (lower price range). So, the kinked demand curve becomes more extreme, like a right angle, when each firm in the cartel produces a near-identical product like OPEC and petroleum.
02

Scenario 2: Somewhat different products

When firms in the cartel produce somewhat different products, the demand for an individual firm's product is less sensitive to changes in price relative to other firms' products. This is because the products are not perfect substitutes for each other, and consumers might prefer specific firms' products due to product differentiation. In this case, the demand curve response to price changes would be less pronounced. If a firm raises its price, the decrease in demand would be less pronounced than in the case of near-identical products. Consequently, the demand curve above the kink (higher price range) would be less elastic. Similarly, if a firm lowers its price, the increase in demand might not be very drastic, because of product differentiation and other factors like brand loyalty. As a result, the demand curve below the kink (lower price range) would also be less inelastic. So, the kinked demand curve becomes less extreme, like a normal demand curve, when each firm in the cartel produces a somewhat different product.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Sometimes oligopolies in the same industry are very different in size. Suppose we have a duopoly where one firm (Firm A) is large and the other firm (Firm B) is small, as the prisoner's dilemma box in Table 10.4 shows. $$\begin{array}{l|l|l}\hline & \begin{array}{l}\text { Firm B colludes with Firm } \\\\\text { A }\end{array} & \begin{array}{l}\text { Firm B cheats by selling more } \\\\\text { output }\end{array} \\\\\hline \text { Firm A colludes with Firm B } & \begin{array}{l}\text { A gets } \$ 1,000, \text { B gets } \\\\\$ 100\end{array} & \text { A gets \$800, B gets \$200 } \\\\\hline \begin{array}{l}\text { Firm A cheats by selling more } \\ \text { output }\end{array} & \begin{array}{l}\text { A gets \$1,050, B gets } \\\\\$ 50\end{array} & \text { A gets \$500, B gets \$20 } \\\\\hline\end{array}$$ Assuming that both firms know the payoffs, what is the likely outcome in this case?

Continuing with the scenario in question \(1,\) in the long run, the positive economic profits that the monopolistic competitor earns will attract a response either from existing firms in the industry or firms outside. As those firms capture the original firm's profit, what will happen to the original firm's profit-maximizing price and output levels?

Mary and Raj are the only two growers who provide organically grown corn to a local grocery store. They know that if they cooperated and produced less corn, they could raise the price of the corn. If they work independently, they will each earn \(100\)dollar. If they decide to work together and both lower their output, they can each earn \(150\). If one person lowers output and the other does not, the person who lowers output will earn \(0\)dollar and the other person will capture the entire market and will earn \(200\)dollar Table 10.6 represents the choices available to Mary and Raj. What is the best choice for Raj if he is sure that Mary will cooperate? If Mary thinks Raj will cheat, what should Mary do and why? What is the prisoner's dilemma result? What is the preferred choice if they could ensure cooperation? \(A=\) Work independently; \(\mathrm{B}=\) Cooperate and Lower Output. (Each results entry lists Raj's earnings first, and Mary's earnings second.)

Andrea's Day Spa began to offer a relaxing aromatherapy treatment. The firm asks you how much to charge to maximize profits. The first two columns in Table 10.5 provide the price and quantity for the demand curve for treatments. The third column shows its total costs. For each level of output, calculate total revenue, marginal revenue, average cost, and marginal cost. What is the profit-maximizing level of output for the treatments and how much will the firm earn in profits? $$\begin{array}{l|l|l}\hline {\text { Price }} & {\text { Quantity }} & {\text { TC }} \\\\\hline \$ 25.00 & 0 & \$ 130 \\\\\hline \$ 24.00 & 10 & \$ 275 \\\\\hline \$ 23.00 & 20 & \$ 435 \\\\\hline \$ 22.50 & 30 & \$ 610 \\ \hline \$ 22.00 & 40 & \$ 800 \\\\\hline \$ 21.60 & 50 & \$ 1,005 \\\\\hline \$ 21.20 & 60 & \$ 1,225 \\ \hline\end{array}$$

Is a monopolistically competitive firm productively efficient? Is it allocatively efficient? Why or why not?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free