If the firms in a monopolistically competitive market are earning economic profits or losses in the short run, would you expect them to continue doing so in the long run? Why?

Short Answer

Expert verified
In a monopolistically competitive market, firms will not continue earning economic profits or incurring losses in the long run. This is because the low barriers to entry and exit allow for adjustments in the number of firms participating in the market. These adjustments ultimately eliminate economic profits and losses, and firms end up earning normal profits in the long run.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Monopolistic Competition

Monopolistic competition is a market structure where a large number of firms sell differentiated products or services. Differentiation can be in terms of product features, quality, branding, or location. Barriers to entry and exit in this market structure are low; hence, firms can freely enter or exit the market.
02

Short-Run Profits and Losses

In the short run, firms in a monopolistically competitive market can earn economic profits or incur losses. This is because the price charged by a firm (P) is greater than the marginal cost (MC), which results in economic profits. Similarly, if the price is lower than the average total cost (ATC), the firm incurs losses.
03

Long-Run Adjustments

In the long run, if firms are making economic profits in the short run, it will attract new firms to enter the market. This will increase competition, and the demand for the existing firms' products will decrease. As the demand decreases, the existing firms' prices will also decrease, reducing their economic profits. This process will continue until the economic profits diminish to zero in the long run. On the other hand, if firms are incurring losses in the short run, some can exit the market in the absence of barriers to exit. This exit reduces competition, and the remaining firms will experience an increase in demand and will increase their prices. As prices rise, the losses will slowly lessen. This process continues until the firms are no longer incurring losses in the long run.
04

Conclusion

So, in a monopolistically competitive market, we do not expect firms to continue earning economic profits or incurring losses in the long run. The adjustments in the number of firms entering or exiting the market will eventually lead to a situation where economic profits and losses are eliminated, and firms just earn normal profits. The primary reason for this convergence is the low barriers to entry and exit, allowing firms to respond to profit opportunities and losses.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What is the relationship between product differentiation and monopolistic competition?

Continuing with the scenario in question \(1,\) in the long run, the positive economic profits that the monopolistic competitor earns will attract a response either from existing firms in the industry or firms outside. As those firms capture the original firm's profit, what will happen to the original firm's profit-maximizing price and output levels?

Sometimes oligopolies in the same industry are very different in size. Suppose we have a duopoly where one firm (Firm A) is large and the other firm (Firm B) is small, as the prisoner's dilemma box in Table 10.4 shows. $$\begin{array}{l|l|l}\hline & \begin{array}{l}\text { Firm B colludes with Firm } \\\\\text { A }\end{array} & \begin{array}{l}\text { Firm B cheats by selling more } \\\\\text { output }\end{array} \\\\\hline \text { Firm A colludes with Firm B } & \begin{array}{l}\text { A gets } \$ 1,000, \text { B gets } \\\\\$ 100\end{array} & \text { A gets \$800, B gets \$200 } \\\\\hline \begin{array}{l}\text { Firm A cheats by selling more } \\ \text { output }\end{array} & \begin{array}{l}\text { A gets \$1,050, B gets } \\\\\$ 50\end{array} & \text { A gets \$500, B gets \$20 } \\\\\hline\end{array}$$ Assuming that both firms know the payoffs, what is the likely outcome in this case?

Suppose that, due to a successful advertising campaign, a monopolistic competitor experiences an increase in demand for its product. How will that affect the price it charges and the quantity it supplies?

Does each individual in a prisoner's dilemma benefit more from cooperation or from pursuing self-interest? Explain briefly.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free