What is regulatory capture?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Regulatory capture is a situation where a government regulatory agency, created to protect the public interest, ends up being controlled or heavily influenced by the industry it is intended to regulate. This can occur through lobbying, financial incentives, or personal connections. Examples include the financial industry during the 2008 crisis, environmental protection agencies influenced by energy companies, and telecommunications regulators favoring large providers. Consequences of regulatory capture include weakened regulations, loss of public trust, and inefficient markets. To counteract this, measures such as greater transparency, clear rules, and minimizing industry influence can be implemented.

Step by step solution

01

Introduction to Regulatory Capture

Regulatory capture is a situation in which a government regulatory agency, formed to protect the public interest, ends up being controlled or heavily influenced by the industry it is intended to regulate. The capture can occur over time through various means such as lobbying, financial incentives, or personal connections between industry members and regulators.
02

Examples of Regulatory Capture

Some examples of regulatory capture include: 1. The financial industry: Instances where financial regulators failed to protect the public interest, like during the 2008 financial crisis, can be attributed to regulatory capture. Close relationships between regulators and financial institutions led to insufficient oversight and monitoring. 2. Environmental protection: Regulatory agencies may be influenced by energy companies to approve projects with harmful environmental consequences, such as oil drilling or pipeline construction near vital ecosystems. 3. Telecommunications: Regulators may implement policies that favor large telecom providers, stifling competition and leading to high prices and poor service for consumers.
03

Consequences of Regulatory Capture

The consequences of regulatory capture include: 1. Weakening of regulations: Regulations intended to protect the public may be deliberately weakened to serve the interests of the regulated industry. 2. Loss of public trust: If regulatory agencies do not protect the public interest, public trust in these institutions deteriorates, leading to further problems in governance. 3. Inefficient markets: Regulatory capture may lead to the formation of monopolies and oligopolies, which can hinder competition and result in higher prices, less choice, and reduced innovation.
04

Counteracting Regulatory Capture

To reduce the likelihood of regulatory capture, several measures can be implemented: 1. Greater transparency: Ensuring transparency in the regulatory process will help increase accountability and minimize the risks of behind-the-scenes influence by the industry. 2. Clear rules: Establishing clear regulations can reduce the need for judgment calls by regulators, making it more difficult for industries to influence them. 3. Minimizing industry influence: Reducing financial and personal connections between regulators and the industries they oversee is essential to maintain their independence. This can be achieved through stricter rules on lobbying, financial contributions, and revolving door employment.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Some years ago, two intercity bus companies, Greyhound Lines, Inc. and Trailways Transportation System, wanted to merge. One possible definition of the market in this case was "the market for intercity bus service." Another possible definition was "the market for intercity transportation, including personal cars, car rentals, passenger trains, and commuter air flights." Which definition do you think the bus companies preferred, and why?

Is it true that the four-firm concentration ratio puts more emphasis on one or two very large firms, while the Herfindahl-Hirshman Index puts more emphasis on all the firms in the entire market? Explain briefly.

Use the following information to answer the next three questions. In the years before wireless phones, when telephone technology required having a wire running to every home, it seemed plausible that telephone service had diminishing average costs and might require regulation like a natural monopoly. For most of the twentieth century, the national U.S. phone company was AT\&T, and the company functioned as a regulated monopoly. Think about the deregulation of the U.S. telecommunications industry that has occurred over the last few decades. (This is not a research assignment, but a thought assignment based on what you have learned in this chapter.) What are some of the benefits of the deregulation?

As a result of globalization and new information and communications technology, would you expect that the definitions of markets that antitrust authorities use will become broader or narrower?

What is deregulation? Name some industries that have been deregulated in the United States.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free