Log out Go to App
Go to App

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 12: Problem 34

Is zero pollution an optimal goal? Why or why not?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Zero pollution, though idealistic, may not be an optimal goal due to its potential negative impact on the economy and social aspects, and feasibility issues. Instead, striking a balance between environmental protection, economic growth, and social needs through policies that promote sustainable practices, green technologies, and conservation can lead to a more resilient and sustainable future for all.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Concept of Zero Pollution

Zero pollution is a goal in environmental policy where the aim is to eradicate or minimize the release of harmful pollutants and substances into the environment, both naturally and man-made, to preserve the earth's ecosystem and protect human health.
02

Evaluate the Feasibility of Zero Pollution

Completely eradicating pollution may not be possible as humans continue to depend on various industrial, agricultural, and transport activities, which inevitably contribute pollutants to the environment. Furthermore, there are natural sources of pollution like volcanic eruptions, forest fires, etc., that cannot be controlled.
03

Assess the Benefits of Zero Pollution

Achieving zero pollution would result in cleaner air, water, and soil, leading to improved public health, reduced healthcare costs, and higher labor productivity. Additionally, preserving ecosystems would promote biodiversity and provide long-term benefits for humans, flora, and fauna.
04

Consider the Negative Effects

The pursuit of zero pollution, if not carefully managed, has the potential to negatively impact economic growth and job opportunities, as industries might need to drastically change their operations or even shut down if they cannot meet strict environmental regulations. Moreover, this could lead to increased costs and make essential products and services more expensive, disproportionately affecting the underprivileged population.
05

Explore the Alternatives

Instead of solely focusing on zero pollution, it might be more optimal to implement policies that balance economic development, social needs, and environmental protection. This could include setting achievable emission reduction targets, investing in green technologies, promoting conservation and sustainable use of resources, and implementing economic incentives for eco-friendly practices.
06

Conclusion

While zero pollution seems idealistic, it might not be the optimal goal due to its potential negative impact on the economy and social aspects, as well as its feasibility. It is important to strike a balance between environmental protection, economic growth, and social needs through various policies and practices to achieve a sustainable and resilient future for all.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Start your free trial

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider two approaches to reducing emissions of \(\mathrm{CO}_{2}\) into the environment from manufacturing industries in the United States. In the first approach, the U.S. government makes it a policy to use only predetermined technologies. In the second approach, the U.S. government determines which technologies are cleaner and subsidizes their use. Of the two approaches, which is the command-and-control policy?

What are better-defined property rights and what incentive do they provide to account for external costs?

As the extent of environmental protection expands, would you expect the marginal benefits of environmental protection to rise or fall? Why or why not?

Identify whether the market supply curve will shift right or left or will stay the same for the following: a. Firms in an industry are required to pay a fine for their carbon dioxide emissions. b. Companies are sued for polluting the water in a river. c. Power plants in a specific city are not required to address the impact of their air quality emissions. d. Companies that use fracking to remove oil and gas from rock are required to clean up the damage.

Show the market for cigarettes in equilibrium, assuming that there are no laws banning smoking in public. Label the equilibrium private market price and quantity as \(\mathrm{Pm}\) and \(\mathrm{Qm}\). Add whatever is needed to the model to show the impact of the negative externality from second-hand smoking. (Hint: In this case it is the consumers, not the sellers, who are creating the negative externality.) Label the social optimal output and price as Pe and Qe. On the graph, shade in the deadweight loss at the market output.
See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free