Chapter 19: Problem 19
List some of the reasons why economists should not consider GDP an effective measure of the standard of living in a country.
Chapter 19: Problem 19
List some of the reasons why economists should not consider GDP an effective measure of the standard of living in a country.
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeU.S. macroeconomic data are among the best in the world. Given what you leamed in the Clear It Up "How do statisticians measure GDP?", does this surprise you, or does this simply reflect the complexity of a modern economy?
What are the main components of measuring GDP with what is produced?
Why do you think that GDP does not grow at a steady rate, but rather speeds up and slows down?
Last year, a small nation with abundant forests cut down \(\$ 200\) worth of trees. It then turned \(\$ 100\) worth of trees into \(\$ 150\) worth of lumber. It used \(\$ 100\) worth of that lumber to produce \(\$ 250\) worth of bookshelves. Assuming the country produces no other outputs, and there are no other inputs used in producing trees, lumber, and bookshelves, what is this nation's GDP? In other words, what is the value of the final goods the nation produced including trees, lumber and bookshelves?
Why do you suppose that U.S. GDP is so much higher today than 50 or 100 years ago?
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.