Does intra-industry trade contradict the theory of comparative advantage?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Intra-industry trade does not necessarily contradict the theory of comparative advantage. Although it involves the exchange of similar goods within the same industry, countries may specialize in producing different varieties or qualities of goods, maintaining their comparative advantages. This trade can also be driven by economies of scale and consumer preferences for variety, making it a complementary aspect of international trade rather than a contradiction to the theory of comparative advantage.

Step by step solution

01

Define Intra-industry trade and Comparative advantage

Intra-industry trade is the exchange of similar goods and services within the same industry between countries. This type of trade occurs when a country both imports and exports goods and services from the same industry or sector. Comparative advantage is the ability of a country to produce a specific good or service at a lower opportunity cost than any other country. The theory of comparative advantage argues that countries should specialize in producing goods and services in which they have a lower opportunity cost and trade with other countries to obtain the goods and services in which they have comparative disadvantage.
02

Explore the Differences and Relationship

The theory of comparative advantage is mainly concerned with inter-industry trade, which is the exchange of goods and services between countries in different industries or sectors. According to the comparative advantage, each country should specialize in what they are best at producing and trade with others to obtain the goods they are less efficient at producing. Intra-industry trade, on the other hand, involves the trade of goods within the same industry. This type of trade is not based on the comparative advantage theory, as countries may have similar opportunity costs in producing these goods. However, intra-industry trade does not necessarily contradict the comparative advantage theory. It is possible that countries specialize in producing different varieties or qualities of goods within the same industry. This way, each country may still have a comparative advantage in producing a specific variety or quality of product, leading to intra-industry trade based on comparative advantages.
03

Role of Scale Economies and Consumer Preferences

Intra-industry trade is often driven by economies of scale, where large-scale production can result in lower average cost per unit due to production efficiencies. By specializing in specific varieties or qualities of goods, countries can exploit these economies of scale and increase their productivity. Consumer preferences also play a role in intra-industry trade. Due to different tastes and preferences, consumers in different countries may demand a variety of products within the same industry. This demand for variety creates market opportunities for countries to specialize in and trade different varieties of goods within the same industry.
04

Conclusion

In conclusion, it can be argued that intra-industry trade does not contradict the theory of comparative advantage. Although intra-industry trade involves the exchange of similar goods within the same industry, it can still be based on comparative advantages if countries specialize in producing different varieties or qualities of goods. Moreover, economies of scale and consumer preferences also influence the intra-industry trade, making it a complementary aspect of international trade rather than a contradiction to the theory of comparative advantage.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In World Trade Organization meetings, what do you think low-income countries lobby for?

France and Tunisia both have Mediterranean climates that are excellent for producing/harvesting green beans and tomatoes. In France it takes two hours for each worker to harvest green beans and two hours to harvest a tomato. Tunisian workers need only one hour to harvest the tomatoes but four hours to harvest green beans. Assume there are only two workers, one in each country, and each works 40 hours a week. a. Draw a production possibilities frontier for each country. Hint: Remember the production possibility frontier is the maximum that all workers can produce at a unit of time which, in this problem, is a week. b. Identify which country has the absolute advantage in green beans and which country has the absolute advantage in tomatoes. c. Identify which country has the comparative advantage. d. How much would France have to give up in terms of tomatoes to gain from trade? How much would it have to give up in terms of green beans?

In Japan, one worker can make 5 tons of rubber or 80 radios. In Malaysia, one worker can make 10 tons of rubber or 40 radios. a. Who has the absolute advantage in the production of rubber or radios? How can you tell? b. Calculate the opportunity cost of producing 80 additional radios in Japan and in Malaysia. (Your calculation may involve fractions, which is fine.) Which country has a comparative advantage in the production of radios? c. Calculate the opportunity cost of producing 10 additional tons of rubber in Japan and in Malaysia. Which country has a comparative advantage in producing rubber? d. In this example, does each country have an absolute advantage and a comparative advantage in the same good? e. In what product should Japan specialize? In what product should Malaysia specialize?

Why does the United States not have an absolute advantage in coffee?

Is it possible to have a comparative advantage in the production of a good but not to have an absolute advantage? Explain.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free