Explain all the reasons why a decrease in a product's price would lead to an increase in purchases.

Short Answer

Expert verified
A decrease in a product's price leads to an increase in purchases due to the law of demand, elasticity of demand, income effect, substitution effect, and psychological impact on consumers. Lower prices make the product more affordable, affecting the consumption patterns of consumers by increasing their purchasing power. Products with higher elasticity see a greater increase in purchases, and lower prices may attract consumers to choose the product over its substitutes. Additionally, consumers might perceive a lower price as a "good deal" or "bargain," leading to increased demand.

Step by step solution

01

1. Understand the Law of Demand

The law of demand is a fundamental principle in economics that states that, all other factors being equal, as the price of a product decreases, the quantity demanded of that product increases. This means that when a product's price goes down, more people will buy it because they find it more affordable. A graphical representation of this principle shows an inverse relationship between price and quantity demanded, with the curve sloping downward.
02

2. Explore the concept of elasticity of demand

The elasticity of demand is an economic measure of how sensitive the demand for a product is to a change in its price. Products with higher elasticity (elastic goods) will have a more significant increase in purchases when their prices decrease compared to products with lower elasticity (inelastic goods). Some reasons behind the differences in elasticity include the availability of substitutes, the necessity of the product, and how much the price change affects the consumers' budgets.
03

3. Income effect on demand

The income effect is the change in the consumption pattern of a consumer due to an increase in their purchasing power. When the price of a product decreases, it essentially increases the consumers' purchasing power, which leads to more purchases. This happens because now consumers can buy more of that product with the same amount of money, thus making it more attractive to buy.
04

4. Substitution effect on demand

When the price of a product decreases, it may become more attractive to consumers than other related products that are considered substitutes for that product. This occurs because of the substitution effect, in which consumers will replace a more expensive good with a less expensive substitute. Therefore, when a product's price Goes down, not only is it more in line with consumers' budgets, but it may also appear as a more sensible choice compared to other products, leading to an increase in purchases.
05

5. Psychological impact on demand

A decrease in a product's price can also have a psychological impact on consumers. A lower price might convey a feeling of a "good deal" or "bargain," which may lead consumers to buy more of the product. Similarly, with the fear of missing out (FOMO) or anticipation that the price may go up again, consumers might choose to purchase the good at the discounted price further leading to an increased demand. To conclude, there are several reasons why a product's price decrease can lead to an increase in purchases. These include the law of demand, elasticity, income and substitution effects, and the psychological impact on consumers.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Is it possible for total utility to increase while marginal utility diminishes? Explain.

Income effects depend on the income elasticity of demand for each good that you buy. If one of the goods you buy has a negative income elasticity, that is, it is an inferior good, what must be true of the income elasticity of the other good you buy?

Praxilla, who lived in ancient Greece, derives utility from reading poems and from eating cucumbers. Praxilla gets 30 units of marginal utility from her first poem, 27 units of marginal utility from her second poem, 24 units of marginal utility from her third poem, and so on, with marginal utility declining by three units for each additional poem. Praxilla gets six units of marginal utility for each of her first three cucumbers consumed, five units of marginal utility for each of her next three cucumbers consumed, four units of marginal utility for each of the following three cucumbers consumed, and so on, with marginal utility declining by one for every three cucumbers consumed. A poem costs three bronze coins but a cucumber costs only one bronze coin. Praxilla has 18 bronze coins. Sketch Praxilla's budget set between poems and cucumbers, placing poems on the vertical axis and cucumbers on the horizontal axis. Start off with the choice of zero poems and 18 cucumbers, and calculate the changes in marginal utility of moving along the budget line to the next choice of one poem and 15 cucumbers. Using this step-bystep process based on marginal utility, create a table and identify Praxilla's utility-maximizing choice. Compare the marginal utility of the two goods and the relative prices at the optimal choice to see if the expected relationship holds. Hint: Label the table columns: 1) Choice, 2) Marginal Gain from More Poems, 3) Marginal Loss from Fewer Cucumbers, 4) Overall Gain or Loss, 5) Is the previous choice optimal? Label the table rows: 1) 0 Poems and 18 Cucumbers, 2) 1 Poem and 15 Cucumbers, 3 ) 2 Poems and 12 Cucumbers, 4 ) 3 Poems and 9 Cucumbers, 5 ) 4 Poems and 6 Cucumbers, 6) 5 Poems and 3 Cucumbers, 7 ) 6 Poems and 0 Cucumbers.

What is the rule relating the ratio of marginal utility to prices of two goods at the optimal choice? Explain why, if this rule does not hold, the choice cannot be utility-maximizing.

If people do not have a complete mental picture of total utility for every level of consumption, how can they find their utility-maximizing consumption choice?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free