What arguments do low-income countries make in international discussions of global environmental clean-up

Short Answer

Expert verified

Low-income countries might debate the practices of high-income countries in the past that led to development.

Step by step solution

01

Introduction

Warming of the planet: Pollution causes a gradual rise in the temperature of the earth's atmosphere.

02

Explanation

Low-income countries use fossil fuels, which pollute the environment. They couldn't readily switch to renewable energy because their installations are time-consuming and costly. Low-income countries can argue at international conferences that high-income countries exploited fossil fuels in the past and became global leaders.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A country called Sherwood is very heavily covered with a forest of 50,000 trees. There are proposals

to clear some of Sherwood’s forest and grow corn, but obtaining this additional economic output will have an environmental cost from reducing the number of trees. Table 12.11 shows possible combinations of economic output and environmental protection.

a. Sketch a graph of a production possibility frontier with environmental quality on the horizontal axis, measured by the number of trees, and the quantity of economic output, measured in corn, on the vertical axis.

b. Which choices display productive efficiency? How can you tell?

c. Which choices show allocative efficiency? How can you tell?

d. In the choice between T and R, decide which one is better. Why?

e. In the choice between T and S, can you say which one is better, and why?

f. If you had to guess, which choice would you think is more likely to represent a command-and-control

environmental policy and which choice is more likely to represent a market-oriented environmental policy, choice Q or S? Why?

What are better-defined property rights and what incentive do they provide to account for external costs?

Is zero pollution possible under a marketable permits system? Why or why not?

The rows in Table 12.7 show three market-oriented tools for reducing pollution. The columns of the table show three complaints about command-and-control regulation. Fill in the table by stating briefly how each market-oriented tool addresses each of the three concerns.


Incentives to

Go Beyond


Flexibility about Where and How

Pollution Will Be Reduced


Political Process Creates

Loopholes and Exceptions


Pollution

Charges





Marketable

Permits





Property

Rights





What does a point inside the production possibility frontier represent?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free