Consider two ways of protecting elephants from poachers in African countries. In one approach, the government sets up enormous national parks that have sufficient habitat for elephants to thrive and forbids all local people to enter the parks or to injure either the elephants or their habitat in any way. In a second approach, the government sets up the national parks and designates 10villages around the edges of the park as official tourist centers that become places where tourists can stay and bases for guided tours inside the national park. Consider the different incentives of local villagers - who often are very poor - in each of these plans. Which plan seems more likely to help the elephant population?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Second plan will help the elephant population because it benefits the villages also.

Step by step solution

01

Introduction

Policies that set pollution emission limitations and make it essential to use specified pollution management strategies are known as command and control policies.

02

Explanation

Second option are going to be the most effective plan as villagers provide protection to animals and reciprocally they get opportunity to earn from tourist who come there. This plan also helps to boost the quality of living of villagers living round the park. the primary plan wasn't offering such incentives though the regulations were passed to shield the elephants. which might also work better for elephants but those who are around won't get benefitted out of it.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What does a point inside the production possibility frontier represent?

A country called Sherwood is very heavily covered with a forest of 50,000 trees. There are proposals

to clear some of Sherwood’s forest and grow corn, but obtaining this additional economic output will have an environmental cost from reducing the number of trees. Table 12.11 shows possible combinations of economic output and environmental protection.

a. Sketch a graph of a production possibility frontier with environmental quality on the horizontal axis, measured by the number of trees, and the quantity of economic output, measured in corn, on the vertical axis.

b. Which choices display productive efficiency? How can you tell?

c. Which choices show allocative efficiency? How can you tell?

d. In the choice between T and R, decide which one is better. Why?

e. In the choice between T and S, can you say which one is better, and why?

f. If you had to guess, which choice would you think is more likely to represent a command-and-control

environmental policy and which choice is more likely to represent a market-oriented environmental policy, choice Q or S? Why?

In the tradeoff between economic output and environmental protection, what do the combinations on the protection possibility curve represent?

In a market without environmental regulations, will the supply curve for a firm account for private costs, external costs, both, or neither? Explain.

How can high-income countries benefit from

covering much of the cost of reducing pollution created

by low-income countries?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free