Log out Go to App
Go to App

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 10: Q. 18 (page 253)

When OPEC raised the price of oil dramatically in the mid-1970s, experts said it was unlikely that the cartel could stay together over the long term—that the incentives for individual members to cheat would become too strong. More than forty years later, OPEC still exists. Why do you think OPEC has been able to beat the odds and continue to collude? Hint: You may wish to consider non-economic reasons.

Short Answer

Expert verified

After 40years, OPEC has been able to beat the odds and continue to collude because of the nature of demand curve i.e. kinked demand curve which causes a very little increase in quantity sold. OPEC countries have also an advantage of natural resources.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Incentive to cheat

Firms in an oligopoly can collude and form a cartel to act like a monopoly market and keep the quantity low and price high. Since, such agreement is generally not legal, there is a very high chance of cheating.

02

Step 2. Reason for still existing OPEC

The non-economic reason for the countries not cheating and breaking away from the cartel is because they are not only a collusion but they also act as a strategic alliance between these oil producing and exporting nations and cater to their broad interests. These countries also have cultural, regional, and religious similarities, which can also be another reason for cooperation.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Start your free trial

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose that, due to a successful advertising campaign, a monopolistic competitor experiences an increase in demand for its product. How will that affect the price it charges and the quantity it supplies?

Consider the curve in the figure below, which shows the market demand, marginal cost, and marginal revenue curve for firms in an oligopolistic industry. In this example, we assume firms have zero fixed costs.

a. Suppose the firms collude to form a cartel. What price will the cartel charge? What quantity will the cartel

supply? How much profit will the cartel earn?

b. Suppose now that the cartel breaks up and the oligopolistic firms compete as vigorously as possible by cutting the price and increasing sales. What will be the industry quantity and price? What will be the collective profits of all firms in the industry?

c. Compare the equilibrium price, quantity, and profit for the cartel and cutthroat competition outcomes.

Will the firms in an oligopoly act more like a

monopoly or more like competitors? Briefly explain.

If the firms in a monopolistically competitive market

are earning economic profits or losses in the short run, would you expect them to continue doing so in the long run? Why?

Would you expect the kinked demand curve to be more extreme (like a right angle) or less extreme (like a normal demand curve) if each firm in the cartel produces a near-identical product like OPEC and petroleum? What if each firm produces a somewhat different products? Explain your reasoning.
See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free