Continuing with the scenario in question 1, in the long run, the positive economic profits that the monopolistic

competitor earns will attract a response either from existing firms in the industry or firms outside. As those firms capture the original firm’s profit, what will happen to the original firm’s profit-maximizing price and output levels?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Original firms will earn zero economic profits in the long run.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Explanation

Other companies will respond in ways that take away the profits of the initial firm as long as the original firm is making positive economic gains. This will manifest as a decrease in demand for the original firm's product, a decrease in the firm's profit-maximizing price, and a decrease in the firm's profit-maximizing output level, effectively unwinding the process of increasing demand and a further increase in prices by the monopolistically competitive firm as a result of the successful advertising campaign.

02

Step 2. Final answer

The original firm, which generates higher profits due to a successful advertising campaign, will earn zero economic profits in the long run equilibrium.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose that, due to a successful advertising campaign, a monopolistic competitor experiences an increase in demand for its product. How will that affect the price it charges and the quantity it supplies?

Sometimes oligopolies in the same industry are very different in size. Suppose we have a duopoly where one firm

(Firm A) is large and the other firm (Firm B) is small, as the prisoner’s dilemma box in Table 10.4 shows.


Firm B colludes with firm AFirm B cheats by selling more output
Firm A colludes with firm B
A gets \(1000,B gets \)100A gets \(800, B gets \)200
Firm A cheats by selling more outputA gets \(1050, B gets\)50A gets \(500, B gets \)20

Assuming that both firms know the payoffs, what is the likely outcome in this case?

Would you rather have efficiency or variety? That is, one opportunity cost of the variety of products we have is that each product costs more per unit than if there were only one kind of product of a given type, like shoes. Perhaps a better question is, “What is the right amount of variety? Can there be too many varieties of shoes, for example?”

Does each individual in a prisoner’s dilemma benefit more from cooperation or from pursuing self-interest? Explain briefly.

Would you expect the kinked demand curve to be more extreme (like a right angle) or less extreme (like a normal demand curve) if each firm in the cartel produces a near-identical product like OPEC and petroleum? What if each firm produces a somewhat different products? Explain your reasoning.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free