Chapter 10: Problem 33
A government official announces a new policy. The country wishes to eliminate its trade deficit, but will strongly encourage financial investment from foreign firms. Explain why such a statement is contradictory.
Chapter 10: Problem 33
A government official announces a new policy. The country wishes to eliminate its trade deficit, but will strongly encourage financial investment from foreign firms. Explain why such a statement is contradictory.
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeWhat three factors will determine whether a nation has a higher or lower share of trade relative to its GDP?
Explain briefly whether each of the following would be more likely to lead to a higher level of trade for an economy, or a greater imbalance of trade for an economy. a. Living in an especially large country b. Having a domestic investment rate much higher than the domestic savings rate c. Having many other large economies geographically nearby d. Having an especially large budget deficit e. Having countries with a tradition of strong protectionist legislation shutting out imports
Imagine that the U.S. economy finds itself in the following situation: a government budget deficit of \(100\) billion dollars, total domestic savings of \(1,500\) billion dollars, and total domestic physical capital investment of \(1,600\) billion dollars. According to the national saving and investment identity, what will be the current account balance? What will be the current account balance if investment rises by \(50\) billion dollars, while the budget deficit and national savings remain the same?
If countries reduced trade barriers, would the international flows of money increase?
What are the two main sides of the national savings and investment identity?
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.