Log out Go to App
Go to App

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 11: Problem 37

Can extreme levels of pollution hurt the economic development of a high-income country? Why or why not?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Yes, extreme levels of pollution can hurt the economic development of a high-income country if the negative impacts on human health, the environment, and social welfare outweigh the positive contributions of polluting industries. Adverse health effects increase healthcare costs and reduce labor productivity, while environmental degradation affects industries relying on natural resources. Reduced social welfare may deter foreign investment and talent, negatively impacting economic development. Policies should aim to balance economic growth and environmental sustainability.

Step by step solution

01

Identification of high-income country

A high-income country is defined as a country with a high gross national income (GNI) per capita. These countries generally have well-developed industries, infrastructure, and stable institutions. An example of a high-income country could be the United States, Germany, or Japan.
02

Understanding the impacts of pollution

Pollution can have both negative and positive impacts on the economy. On one hand, pollution can be a by-product of economic activities such as manufacturing and transportation, which generate income and contribute to economic development. On the other hand, increased pollution levels could lead to negative effects on human health, environmental quality, and overall social welfare. We need to determine if the negative effects of extreme pollution levels can outweigh the positive impacts on a high-income country's economic growth.
03

Effects of pollution on human health

Extreme levels of pollution can have adverse effects on human health. Exposure to air, water, and soil contaminants can lead to various illnesses, including respiratory issues, cardiovascular diseases, and even cancer. These health issues could increase healthcare costs, reduce labor productivity, and affect the overall well-being of the population, which in turn can negatively impact the economic development of a high-income country.
04

Effects of pollution on environmental quality

Pollution can also degrade environmental quality, such as natural resources and ecosystems. This can lead to the loss of biodiversity and the reduction of valuable ecosystem services, which can negatively impact industries that rely on natural resources, such as agriculture, fisheries, and tourism. As a result, extreme pollution levels can potentially harm the economic development of a high-income country by undermining sectors that contribute to economic growth.
05

Effects of pollution on social welfare

In addition to its impact on human health and environmental quality, extreme pollution levels can also reduce social welfare. Pollution can increase the costs of living, reduce property values, and diminish the overall quality of life for residents in affected areas. These factors may deter foreign investment and talent, resulting in a negative impact on a high-income country's economic development.
06

Balancing the negative and positive impacts

To determine if extreme levels of pollution can hurt the economic development of a high-income country, we need to weigh the negative impacts against the positive contributions of pollution-generating economic activities. For example, if the costs of pollution (healthcare costs, lost productivity, reduced social welfare) are greater than the benefits (income generated by polluting industries), then it can be concluded that extreme pollution levels will indeed hurt the economic development of a high-income country.
07

Conclusion

Extreme levels of pollution can potentially hurt the economic development of a high-income country if the negative impacts on human health, the environment, and social welfare outweigh the positive contributions of polluting industries. Policymakers should consider implementing policies to reduce pollution levels, such as regulations and incentives for cleaner technologies, to maintain a balance between economic development and environmental sustainability.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Start your free trial

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Identify whether the market supply curve will shift right or left or will stay the same for the following: a. Fims in an industry are required to pay a fine for their carbon dioxide emissions. b. Companies are sued for polluting the water in a river. c. Power plants in a specific city are not required to address the impact of their air quality emissions. d. Companies that use fracking to remove oil and gas from rock are required to clean up the damage.

An emissions tax on a quantity of emissions from a firm is not a command-and- control approach to reducing pollution. Why?

Classify the following pollution-control policies as command-and-control or market incentive based. a. A state emissions tax on the quantity of carbon emitted by each firm. b. The federal government requires domestic auto companies to improve car emissions by 2020 . c. The EPA sets national standards for water quality. d. A city sells permits to firms that allow them to emit a specified quantity of pollution. e. The federal govemment pays fishermen to preserve salmon.

Identify the following situations as an example of a negative or a positive externality: a. You are a birder (bird watcher), and your neighbor has put up several birdhouses in the yard as well as planting trees and flowers that attract birds. b. Your neighbor paints his house a hideous color. c. Investments in private education raise your country's standard of living. d. Trash dumped upstream flows downstream right past your home. e. Your roommate is a smoker, but you are a nonsmoker.

What are the three problems that economists have noted with regard to command- and-control regulation?
See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free