Chapter 6: Problem 20
U.S. macroeconomic data are among the best in the world. Given what you learned in the Clear It Up "How do statisticians measure GDP?", does this surprise you, or does this simply reflect the complexity of a modern economy?
Chapter 6: Problem 20
U.S. macroeconomic data are among the best in the world. Given what you learned in the Clear It Up "How do statisticians measure GDP?", does this surprise you, or does this simply reflect the complexity of a modern economy?
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeShould people typically pay more attention to their real income or their nominal income? If you choose the latter, why would that make sense in today's world? Would your answer be the same for the 1970 s?
What is the difference between a series of economic data over time measured in nominal terms versus the same data series over time measured in real terms?
List some of the reasons why economists should not consider GDP an effective measure of the standard of living in a country.
Last year, a small nation with abundant forests cut down 200 dollar worth of trees. It then turned 100 dollar worth of trees into 150 dollar worth of lumber. It used 100 dollar worth of that lumber to produce 250 dollar worth of bookshelves. Assuming the country produces no other outputs, and there are no other inputs used in producing trees, lumber, and bookshelves, what is this nation's GDP? In other words, what is the value of the final goods the nation produced including trees, lumber and bookshelves?
Is it possible for GDP to rise while at the same time per capita GDP is falling? Is it possible for GDP to fall while per capita GDP is rising?
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.