Chapter 21: Q 48. (page 523)
Why might a tax on domestic consumption of
resources critical for national security be a more
efficient approach than barriers to imports?
Short Answer
Domestic tax reduces the wastage of goods.
Chapter 21: Q 48. (page 523)
Why might a tax on domestic consumption of
resources critical for national security be a more
efficient approach than barriers to imports?
Domestic tax reduces the wastage of goods.
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeWhy might the unsafe consumer products argument be a more effective strategy (from the perspective of the importing country) than using tariffs or quotas to restrict imports?
Name and define three policy tools for enacting
protectionism.
How does competition, whether domestic or foreign, harm businesses?
Explain how a subsidy on agricultural goods like sugar adversely affects the income of foreign producers of imported sugar.
The country of Pepperland exports steel to the Land of Submarines. Information for the quantity demanded (Qd) and quantity supplied (Qs) in each country, in a world without trade, are given in Table 21.6 and Table 21.7.
a. What would be the equilibrium price and quantity in each country in a world without trade? How can you tell?
b. What would be the equilibrium price and quantity in each country if trade is allowed to occur? How can you tell?
c. Sketch two supply and demand diagrams, one for each country, in the situation before trade.
d. On those diagrams, show the equilibrium price and the levels of exports and imports in the world after trade.
e. If the Land of Submarines imposes an antidumping import quota of 30, explain in general terms whether it will benefit or injure consumers and producers in each country.
f. Does your general answer change if the Land of Submarines imposes an import quota of 70?
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.