Under what condition would crowding out not inhibit long-run economic growth? Under what condition would crowding out impede long-run economic growth?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Compensating for a lack of private investment during a downturn.

If increased government expenditure continues past the point where potential output is reached, or when private investment demand is high,

Step by step solution

01

Definition

Economic growth :

Economic growth is the increase or development in the production and distribution of goods and services in a given economy over time. The increased value of a market product as a result of economic inflationary adjustments characterizes economic growth. The percentage increase in the gross domestic product is used to quantify or assess growth (GDP).

02

Explanation

The decline in economic activity associated with deficit-financed spending is referred to as "crowding out" by economists. Government expenditure produces less economic growth as a result of crowding out, which must be balanced against any good effects of government spending. Increased government spending would not stifle long-term growth if it were used to compensate for a lack of private investment during a recession, because the lack of demand for investment would avoid crowding out.

Crowding out would stifle long-term growth if increasing government spending continues past the point of potential output or occurs when private investment demand is high.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Explain whether or not you agree with the premise of the Ricardian equivalence theory that rational people might reason: “Well, a higher budget deficit (surplus) means that I’m just going to owe more (less) taxes in the future to pay off all that government borrowing, so I’ll start saving (spending) now.” Why or why not?

What must take place for the government to run deficits without any crowding out?

Assume that the newly independent government of Tanzania employed you in 1964. Now free from British rule, the Tanzanian parliament has decided that it will spend 10 million shillings on schools, roads, and healthcare for the year. You estimate that the net taxes for the year are eight million shillings. The government will finance the difference by selling 10-year government bonds at 12% interest per year. Parliament must add the interest on outstanding bonds to government expenditure each year. Assume that Parliament places additional taxes to finance this increase in government expenditure so the gap between government spending is always two million. If the school, road, and healthcare budget are unchanged, compute the value of the accumulated debt in 10 years.

What does the concept of rationality have to do with Ricardian equivalence?

Why have many education experts recently placed an emphasis on altering the incentives that U.S. schools face rather than on increasing their budgets? Without endorsing any of these proposals as especially good or bad, list some of the ways in which incentives for schools might be altered.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free