What stops oligopolists from acting together as a monopolist and earning the highest possible level of profits?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Oligopolists are often unable to act together as a monopolist and earn the highest possible level of profits due to hindrances like legal issues, the temptation to cheat, disagreements on terms and conditions, a larger number of firms making coordination difficult, and product differentiation within the market. Anti-trust laws, firm strategies, and product offerings are some factors that contribute to these challenges and prevent sustainable collusion in oligopoly markets.

Step by step solution

01

1. Understanding the Oligopoly market structure

An oligopoly is a market structure in which a few large firms dominate the industry, with each firm holding a significant market share. The firms in an oligopoly are interdependent, meaning their decisions on pricing and production directly impact each other's profits. Barriers to entry are high, making it difficult for new firms to enter the market.
02

2. Collusion in Oligopolies

Collusion is an agreement between the firms in an oligopoly to act together to increase their profits. The most common form of collusion is price-fixing, where the firms agree to set prices at a certain level, thus eliminating competition and behaving like a monopolist. If oligopolists can successfully collude, they can earn monopoly-like profits by raising prices, limiting output, and enjoying higher profit margins on their products.
03

3. Factors that hinder collusion

Despite the potential benefits of collusion, several factors prevent oligopolists from acting like a monopolist: - Legal issues: Anti-trust laws and regulations aim to prevent collusion and price-fixing, which limits oligopolists from entering into such agreements. - Cheating: It can be tempting for an oligopolist to break a collusive agreement and undercut their competitors to gain market share. This distrust makes it difficult for firms to maintain collusion. - Disagreement: Firms within the oligopoly may not agree on the terms and conditions of the collusion. Different firms may prioritize different pricing strategies or target different customers, making it challenging to agree on a unified plan. - Number of firms: The more firms in an oligopoly, the more difficult it is to coordinate and maintain collusive agreements. - Product differentiation: If the products in an oligopoly market are not identical, it becomes more challenging for firms to agree on price fixing and other collusive arrangements.
04

4. Conclusion

While oligopolists have the potential to act together and earn monopolistic profits, various factors hinder them from doing so. The difficulty in maintaining collusion, the deterrence of anti-trust laws and regulations, and differences in strategy or product offerings make it challenging for oligopolists to act as a monopolist consistently and reliably.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose that, due to a successful advertising campaign, a monopolistic competitor experiences an increase in demand for its product. How will that affect the price it charges and the quantity it supplies?

Mary and Raj are the only two growers who provide organically grown com to a local grocery store. They know that if they cooperated and produced less corn, they could raise the price of the com. If they work independently, they will each earn \(\$ 100 .\) If they decide to work together and both lower their output, they can each earn \(\$ 150 .\) If one person lowers output and the other does not, the person who lowers output will eam \(\$ 0\) and the other person will capture the entire market and will earn \(\$ 200\). Table 10.6 represents the choices available to Mary and Raj. What is the best choice for Raj if he is sure that Mary will cooperate? If Mary thinks Raj will cheat, what should Mary do and why? What is the prisoner's dilemma result? What is the preferred choice if they could ensure cooperation? \(A=\) Work independently; \(\mathrm{B}=\) Cooperate and Lower Output. (Each results entry lists Raj's eamings first, and Mary's earnings second.)

How can a monopolistic competitor tell whether the price it is charging will cause the firm to earn profits or experience losses?

If the firms in a monopolistically competitive market are earning economic profits or losses in the short run, would you expect them to continue doing so in the long run? Why?

How is the perceived demand curve for a monopolistically competitive firm different from the perceived demand curve for a monopoly or a perfectly competitive firm?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free