Chapter 8: Problem 29
Will a perfectly competitive market display allocative efficiency? Why or why not?
Chapter 8: Problem 29
Will a perfectly competitive market display allocative efficiency? Why or why not?
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeIn the argument for why perfect competition is allocatively efficient, the price that people are willing to pay represents the gains to society and the marginal cost to the firm represents the costs to society. Can you think of some social costs or issues that are not included in the marginal cost to the firm? Or some social gains that are not included in what people pay for a good?
Assuming that the market for cigarettes is in perfect competition, what does allocative and productive efficiency imply in this case? What does it not imply?
Why will losses for firms in a perfectly competitive industry tend to vanish in the long run?
A market in perfect competition is in long-nun equilibrium. What happens to the market if labor unions are able to increase wages for workers?
Productive efficiency and allocative efficiency are two concepts achieved in the long run in a perfectly competitive market. These are the two reasons why we call them "perfect." How would you use these two concepts to analyze other market structures and label them "imperfect?"
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.