Review the numbers for Canada and Venezuela from Table 19.12 which describes how many barrels of oil and tons of lumber the workers can produce. Use these numbers to answer the rest of this question.

a. Draw a production possibilities frontier for each country. Assume there are 100 workers in each country. Canadians and Venezuelans desire both oil and lumber. Canadians want at least 2,000 tons of lumber. Mark a point on their production possibilities where they can get at least 3,000 tons.

b. Assume that the Canadians specialize completely because they figured out they have a comparative advantage in lumber. They are

willing to give up 1,000 tons of lumber. How much oil should they ask for in return for this lumber to be as well off as they were with no trade? How much should they ask for if they want to gain from trading with Venezuela? Note: We can think of this “ask” as the relative price or trade price of lumber.

c. Is the Canadian “ask” you identified in (b) also beneficial for Venezuelans? Use the production possibilities frontier graph for Venezuela to show that Venezuelans can gain from trade.

Short Answer

Expert verified

a) (3000, 500)

b) 500 barrels or more

c) Yes

Step by step solution

01

Step1. Given Information

Following output/labor table is given:


OilLumber
Canada2040
Venezuela6030

Also given, 100 workers in each country.

02

Step2. a)Plotting PPC

Output table with respect to 100 workers:


OilLumber
Canada20*100=20004000
Venezuela60003000

Canada:

To plot PPC, we need 2 points. In our case, when 0 barrels of oil is produced, we can produce 4000 units of lumber. Similarly, we can produce 2000 barrels of oil when we produce 0 units of lumber.

Points- (4000,0) and (0,2000)

The slope of PPC for Canada: m= 2000-0/0-4000

= -0.5

Line equation-

y= -0.5x + 2000

So, the point where lumber (x) is 3000-

y= -0.5(3000) + 2000

y= 500

Hence, the point as marked on the PPC curve is (3000,500)

Similarly, for Venezuela, the points are-

(3000,0) and (0,6000)

PPC-

03

Step3. b)Calculation

Canadians can produce 4000 units of lumber or 2000 barrels of Oil.

If they give up 1000 units of lumber for trade, they should ask for-

2000*1000/4000= 500 barrels of oil in return in order to be just as well off as they were without trade.

In order to gain from trade, they must ask more than 500 barrels of oil in return of 1000 units of lumber.

04

Step4. c)Explanation

Venezuela definitely benefits out of the trade. It is giving up 500 barrels of oil.

If we compare with the output capacity of Venezuela,

Venezuela can produce 2000*500/6000= 250 units of lumber along with 500 barrels of oil.

Canada via trade will exchange 1000 units of lumber as compared to 250 units it needs to be just as well of as without trade.

Hence, Venezuela benefits out of trade as well.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

You just got a job in Washington, D.C. You move

into an apartment with some acquaintances. All your roommates, however, are slackers and do not clean up after themselves. You, on the other hand, can clean faster than each of them. You determine that you are 70% faster at dishes and 10% faster with vacuuming. All of these tasks have to be done daily. Which jobs should you assign to your roommates to get the most free time overall? Assume you have the same number of hours to

devote to cleaning. Now, since you are faster, you seem to get done quicker than your roommate. What sorts of problems may this create? Can you imagine a trade-related analogy to this problem?

Why might intra-industry trade seem surprising

from the point of view of comparative advantage?

In Japan, one worker can make 5 tons of rubber or 80 radios. In Malaysia, one worker can make 10 tons of rubber or 40 radios.

a. Who has the absolute advantage in the production of rubber or radios? How can you tell?

b. Calculate the opportunity cost of producing 80 additional radios in Japan and in Malaysia. (Your calculation may involve fractions, which is fine.) Which country has a comparative advantage in the production of radios?

c. Calculate the opportunity cost of producing 10 additional tons of rubber in Japan and in Malaysia. Which country has a comparative advantage in producing rubber?

d. In this example, does each country have an absolute advantage and a comparative advantage in the same good?

e. In what product should Japan specialize? In what product should Malaysia specialize?

If trade increases world GDP by 1% per year, what is the global impact of this increase over 10 years? How does this increase compare to the annual GDP of a country like Sri Lanka? Discuss. Hint: To answer this question, here are steps you may want to consider. Go to the World Development Indicators (online) published by the World Bank. Find the current level of World GDP in constant international dollars. Also, find the GDP of Sri Lanka in constant international dollars. Once you have these two numbers, compute the amount the additional increase in global incomes due to trade and compare that number to Sri Lanka’s GDP.

From earlier chapters you will recall that technological change shifts the average cost curves. Draw a graph showing how technological change could influence intra-industry trade.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free