How is the perceived demand curve for a monopolistically competitive firm different from the perceived demand curve for a monopoly or a perfectly competitive firm?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The perceived demand curve for a monopolistically competitive firm is downward-sloping and less steep than that of a monopoly, reflecting some pricing power due to product differentiation but still facing competition. The perceived demand curve for a monopoly is downward-sloping and steeper, due to a higher pricing power and lower price elasticity of demand as a result of a lack of direct competitors. In contrast, a perfectly competitive firm faces a horizontal demand curve, representing perfect elasticity of demand and being a price taker without any pricing power. The differences between the demand curves for these market structures lie in their shapes, slopes, and underlying price elasticity of demand.

Step by step solution

01

1. Monopolistic Competition Demand Curve

A monopolistically competitive firm faces a downward-sloping demand curve, which means that as the price of its product increases, the quantity demanded decreases. This is because a monopolistically competitive firm has some market power due to product differentiation but still faces competition from other similar firms. In this market structure, the firm can increase its sales by reducing its price, but it cannot charge a very high price without losing a significant share of its customer base. The price elasticity of demand is relatively high, which means that changes in price will have a relatively larger impact on the quantity demanded.
02

2. Monopoly Demand Curve

A monopoly firm also faces a downward-sloping demand curve, but it is typically steeper than that of a monopolistically competitive firm. This is because a monopoly is the sole provider of a product or service, which gives it a higher pricing power and some ability to set a higher price without immediately losing a large share of its customer base. However, the price elasticity of demand in a monopoly is still present, meaning that as the price increases, the quantity demanded will decrease, but the decrease in quantity demanded per unit increase in price will be smaller compared to monopolistic competition.
03

3. Perfect Competition Demand Curve

In a perfectly competitive market, each firm faces a horizontal demand curve, which represents a perfectly elastic demand. This is because there is no product differentiation, and each firm's product is identical to all others in the market. As a result, consumers view each firm's product as a perfect substitute for another, meaning that if one firm raises its price, even by a small amount, consumers will immediately switch to the other competitors. Thus, no firm in perfect competition has any pricing power, and they are price takers operating at the market-determined price.
04

Comparison and Differences

The perceived demand curve for a monopolistically competitive firm is downward sloping, but less steep than that of a monopoly, indicating that it has some pricing power due to product differentiation but still faces competition. The demand curve for a monopoly is also downward-sloping, but it is typically steeper, reflecting the lower price elasticity of demand due to a lack of direct competitors. In contrast, a perfectly competitive firm faces a horizontal demand curve, reflecting the perfect elasticity of demand and the fact that such firms are price takers without any market power. Therefore, the key differences between the demand curves for these three market structures are in their shapes, slopes, and the underlying price elasticity of demand.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

How can a monopolistic competitor tell whether the price it is charging will cause the firm to earn profits or experience losses?

Does each individual in a prisoner's dilemma benefit more from cooperation or from pursuing self- interest? Explain briefly.

When OPEC raised the price of oil dramatically in the mid-1970s, experts said it was unlikely that the cartel could stay together over the long term- that the incentives for individual members to cheat would become too strong. More than forty years later, OPEC still exists. Why do you think OPEC has been able to beat the odds and continue to collude? Hint: You may wish to consider non-economic reasons.

Mary and Raj are the only two growers who provide organically grown corn to a local grocery store. They know that if they cooperated and produced less corn, they could raise the price of the corn. If they work independently, they will each earn \(\$ 100\) . If they decide to work together and both lower their output, and the other does not, the person who lowers output will earn \(\$ 0\) and the other person will capture the entire market and will earn \(\$ 200\) . Table 10.6 represents the choices available to Mary and Raj. What is the bestchoice for Raj if he is sure that Mary will cooperate? If Mary thinks Raj will cheat, what should Mary do and why? What is the prisoner's dilemma result? What is the preferred choice if they could ensure cooperation? A \(=\) Work independently; \(\mathrm{B}=\) Cooperate and Lower Output. (Each results entry lists Raj's earnings first, and Mary's earnings second.)

Will the firms in an oligopoly act more like a monopoly or more like competitors? Briefly explain.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free