Will the demand for borrowing and investing in R&D be higher or lower if there are no external benefits?

Short Answer

Expert verified
In conclusion, the demand for borrowing and investing in R&D will be lower if there are no external benefits. Without external benefits, investors have fewer incentives to invest in projects that create positive impacts for society, and they will only focus on projects that directly benefit their businesses.

Step by step solution

01

Define External Benefits

External benefits (or positive externalities) are benefits that accrue to parties not directly involved in an economic transaction or activity. In the context of R&D, external benefits can include advancements in knowledge, technology, or innovation that benefit others in society, even if they did not invest in the R&D themselves. These benefits are often not captured by the market price and, therefore, may not be taken into account when making investment decisions.
02

Understand R&D Investment Decisions

Firms and individuals invest in R&D to develop new products, technologies, or processes that will provide a competitive advantage or increase the value of their businesses. When considering an investment in R&D, the potential investor will compare the expected costs (such as R&D expenses, interest on loans, and opportunity cost of capital) against the expected benefits (such as increased revenues, lower costs, or more profitable business opportunities).
03

Evaluate the Role of External Benefits in R&D Investment Decisions

When external benefits are present, the social value of the R&D investment can be greater than the private value that accrues to the individual investor. This is because the benefits to society may be much larger than the benefits captured by the individual investor, leading to potential underinvestment in R&D.
04

Compare the Demand for Borrowing and Investing in R&D with and without External Benefits

When there are external benefits, the total benefits from investing in R&D (including both private and social benefits) are higher than without external benefits. This higher total benefit can potentially justify a higher level of investment in R&D. However, since the market may not fully account for the external benefits, there may not be enough incentives for investors to invest at the socially optimal level. On the other hand, without external benefits, the only benefits considered will be the direct private benefits to the investor. In this case, the potential investor will be only focused on their profit and may be less likely to invest in R&D projects that are beneficial for society. Consequently, the demand for borrowing and investing in R&D will be lower compared to the situation when external benefits exist.
05

Conclude

In conclusion, the demand for borrowing and investing in R&D will be lower if there are no external benefits. Without external benefits, investors have fewer incentives to invest in projects that create positive impacts for society, and they will only focus on projects that directly benefit their businesses.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What is the free rider problem?

Becky and Sarah are sisters who share a room. Their room can easily get messy, and their parents are always telling them to tidy it. Here are the costs and benefits to both Becky and Sarah, of taking the time to clean their room: If both Becky and Sarah clean, they each spends two hours and get a clean room. If Becky decides not to clean and Sarah does all the cleaning, then Sarah spends 10 hours cleaning (Becky spends 0) but Sarah is exhausted. The same would occur for Becky if Sarah decided not to clean—Becky spends 10 hours and becomes exhausted. If both girls decide not to clean, they both have a dirty room a. What is the best outcome for Becky and Sarah? What is the worst outcome? (It would help you to construct a prisoner’s dilemma table.) b. Unfortunately, we know that the optimal outcome will most likely not happen, and that the sisters probably will choose the worst one instead. Explain what it is about Becky’s and Sarah’s reasoning that will lead them both to choose the worst outcome..

Do market demand curves reflect positive externalities? Why or why not?

Education provides both private benefits to those who receive it and broader social benefits for the economy as a whole. Think about the types of policies a government can follow to address the issue of positive spillovers in technology and then suggest a parallel set of policies that governments could follow for addressing positive externalities in education.

Why might private markets tend to provide too few incentives for the development of new technology?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free