What assumptions does the model of intertemporal choice make that are not likely true in the real world and would make the model harder to use in practice?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The model of intertemporal choice makes several assumptions that are not likely true in the real world, which makes it harder to use in practice. These assumptions include perfect information, rationality, time consistency, a single utility function, and an infinite lifetime. In reality, consumers often face uncertainty and make irrational decisions, have time-inconsistent preferences, derive utility from multiple aspects of life, and have a finite lifespan. These real-world complexities limit the model's practicality and accuracy in representing actual consumer behavior.

Step by step solution

01

Assumption 1: Perfect Information

The model of intertemporal choice assumes perfect information. Consumers are assumed to know all the possible outcomes and risks associated with all their current and future consumption options. In the real world, however, this is often not the case because decisions are made under uncertainty due to lack of information or inaccurate predictions about the future.
02

Assumption 2: Rationality

The model assumes rational consumers, implying that individuals always make decisions that provide them with the highest utility, considering both present and future consumption. However, this assumption is often violated in the real world where consumers might give into temptations and make irrational decisions, leading to inconsistency in their choices across time.
03

Assumption 3: Time Consistency

In intertemporal choice, it’s assumed that a consumer’s preferences are time-consistent, meaning that their rate of time preference doesn’t change over time. However, in reality, consumers might be time-inconsistent, exhibiting a tendency to increasingly prefer present consumption as a given point in time becomes more imminent, pulling away from their once long-term oriented decisions.
04

Assumption 4: Single Utility Function

The model assumes that consumers derive their well-being based on a single utility function. However, in reality, different aspects such as health, social interactions and personal development may impact a person's utility, leading to multiple utility functions, which complicates the model.
05

Assumption 5: Infinite Lifetime

Another assumption is that consumers live infinitely, allowing them to smooth consumption over an infinite number of periods. This assumption clearly doesn't hold in the real world, as human lifespan is finite. The assumption simplifies the model but can distort important aspects of reality, such as individuals saving for retirement or life insurance. These assumptions, while necessary for simplifying the model, limit the model's practicality in illustrating real-world phenomena accurately.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The rules of politics are not always the same as the rules of economics. In discussions of setting budgets for government agencies, there is a strategy called “closing the Washington Monument.” When an agency faces the unwelcome prospect of a budget cut, it may decide to close a high-visibility attraction enjoyed by many people (like the Washington Monument). Explain in terms of diminishing marginal utility why the Washington Monument strategy is so misleading. Hint: If you are really trying to make the best of a budget cut, should you cut the items in your budget with the highest marginal utility or the lowest marginal utility? Does the Washington Monument strategy cut the items with the highest marginal utility or the lowest marginal utility?

What is the rule relating the ratio of marginal utility to prices of two goods at the optimal choice? Explain why, if this rule does not hold, the choice cannot be utility-maximizing.

Praxilla, who lived in ancient Greece, derives utility from reading poems and from eating cucumbers. Praxilla gets 30 units of marginal utility from her first poem, 27 units of marginal utility from her second poem, 24 units of marginal utility from her third poem, and so on, with marginal utility declining by three units for each additional poem. Praxilla gets six units of marginal utility for each of her first three cucumbers consumed, five units of marginal utility for each of her next three cucumbers consumed, four units of marginal utility for each of the following three cucumbers consumed, and so on, with marginal utility declining by one for every three cucumbers consumed. A poem costs three bronze coins but a cucumber costs only one bronze coin. Praxilla has 18 bronze coins. Sketch Praxilla’s budget set between poems and cucumbers, placing poems on the vertical axis and cucumbers on the horizontal axis. Start off with the choice of zero poems and 18 cucumbers, and calculate the changes in marginal utility of moving along the budget line to the next choice of one poem and 15 cucumbers. Using this step-bystep process based on marginal utility, create a table and identify Praxilla’s utility-maximizing choice. Compare the marginal utility of the two goods and the relative prices at the optimal choice to see if the expected relationship holds. Hint: Label the table columns: 1) Choice, 2) Marginal Gain from More Poems, 3) Marginal Loss from Fewer Cucumbers, 4) Overall Gain or Loss, 5) Is the previous choice optimal? Label the table rows: 1) 0 Poems and 18 Cucumbers, 2) 1 Poem and 15 Cucumbers, 3) 2 Poems and 12 Cucumbers, 4) 3 Poems and 9 Cucumbers, 5) 4 Poems and 6 Cucumbers, 6) 5 Poems and 3 Cucumbers, 7) 6 Poems and 0 Cucumbers.

Is it possible for total utility to increase while marginal utility diminishes? Explain.

Would you expect total utility to rise or fall withadditional consumption of a good? Why?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free