Consider an economy described by the following data:

C=\(4trillionI=\)1.5trillionG=\(3.0trillionT=\)3.0trillionNX=\(1.0trillionf=0

mpc = 0.8

d = 0.35

x = 0.15

a. Derive an expression for the IS curve.

b. Assume that the Federal Reserve controls the interest rate and sets the interest rate at r = 4. What is the equilibrium level of output?

c. Suppose that a financial crisis begins and f increases to f = 3. What will happen to equilibrium output? If the Federal Reserve can set the interest rate, then at what level should the interest rate be set to keep output from changing?

d. Suppose the financial crisis causes f to increase as indicated in part (c) and also causes planned autonomous investment to decrease to I = \)1.1 trillion. Will the change in the interest rate implemented by the Federal Reserve in part (c) be effective in stabilizing output? If not, what additional monetary or fiscal policy changes could be implemented to stabilize output at the original equilibrium output level given in part (b)?

Short Answer

Expert verified

a. Y=35.5-2.5r

b. Y=25.5

c. Y=20.25; r=1.9

d. No; reduction in taxes, increase in government spending, or reducing interest rates

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Given information

C=$4trillionI=$1.5trillionG=$3.0trillionT=$3.0trillionNX=$1.0trillionf=0

mpc = 0.8

d = 0.35

x = 0.15

02

Step 2. Explanation Part (a)

The IS curve can be derived from the output equation

Y=(C+I-df+G+NX-mpc×T)×1mpc-d+x1-mpc×rY=(4+1.5-0.35(0)+3.0+1.0+-0.8×3)×11-0.8-0.35+0.151-0.8×rY=7.1×10.2-0.50.2rY=35.5-2.5r

03

Step 3. Explanation Part (b)

When r=4,

Y=35.5-25rY=35.5-2.5(4)Y=25.5

04

Step 4. Explanation Part (c)

When f=3,

Y=(C+I-df+G+NX-mpc×T)×1mpc-d+x1-mpc×rY=(4+1.5-0.35(3)+3.0+1.0+-0.8×3)×11-0.8-0.35+0.151-0.8×rY=6.05×10.2-0.50.2rY=30.25-2.5r

The output level at r=4,

Y=35.5-25rY=30.5-2.5(4)Y=20.5

Now, suppose the federal reserve wants to keep the output constant at $25.5 trillion.

25.5=30.25-2.5r-4.75=-2.5rr=1.9

05

Step 5. Explanation Part (d)

Now, if the financial crisis causes investment to decrease to $1.1 trillion then, the total output level would be

Y=(C+I-df+G+NX-mpc×T)×1mpc-d+x1-mpc×rY=(4+1.1-0.35(3)+3.0+1.0+-0.8×3)×11-0.8-0.35+0.151-0.8×rY=5.65×10.2-0.50.2rY=28.25-2.5r

Now, if the interest rate is kept at 1.9% then,

Y=28.25-2.5(1.9)Y=23.5

So, the equilibrium level of output would be reduced to $23.5 trillion.

The reduction in the interest rate has not been able to bring back output to the previous equilibrium level. Other policy tools such as reduction in taxes, increase in government spending, or reducing interest rates even further can be adopted.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

During and in the aftermath of the financial crisis of 2007–2009, planned investment fell substantially despite significant decreases in the real interest rate.

What factors related to the planned investment function could explain this?

Why does equilibrium output increase as the marginal propensity to consume increases?

Suppose that Dell Corporation has 20,000 computers in its warehouses on December 31, 2019, ready to be shipped to merchants (each computer is valued at

\(500). By December 31, 2020, Dell Corporation has 25,000 computers ready to be shipped, each valued at \)450.

a. Calculate Dell’s inventory on December 31, 2019.

b. Calculate Dell’s inventory investment in 2020.

c. What happens to inventory spending during the early stages of an economic recession?

Go to http://www.eurmacro.unisg.ch/Tutor/islm.html. Set the policy instruments to G = 80, t = 0.20, c = 0.75, and b = 40. Now increase government spending, G, from 80 to 160. By how much does the IS curve shift horizontally to the right? Why is the amount of shift greater than the increase in G? Now increase the marginal propensity to consume, c, from 0.75 to 0.90. In which direction does the IS curve shift, and why? By how much does it shift? Now increase the tax rate, t, from 0.20 to 0.28. In which direction does the IS curve shift, and why? By how much does it shift?

If a change in the real interest rate has no effect on planned investment spending or net exports, what does this imply about the slope of the IS curve ?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free