During and in the aftermath of the financial crisis of 2007–2009, planned investment fell substantially despite significant decreases in the real interest rate.

What factors related to the planned investment function could explain this?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Decrease in Marginal Productivity of capital, Expected profit can lead to fall in investment despite of decrease in interest rate.

Step by step solution

01

Investment Function Basics 

As per classical economists, specially Keynes -

There are three factors effecting Business Investment - Cost (ie Interest), Return determined by Marginal Efficiency (ie Marginal Productivity) of capital, Expectations

02

Detail Explanation 

If Interest rate has fallen, investment expenditure can still decrease due to unfavourable decline other factors - ie Marginal Efficiency (yield) of capital, Expectations

It leads to decrease & leftward shift of inverse investment curve / function, ie primarily dependent on interest.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The fiscal stimulus package of 2009 caused the IS curve to shift to the left, since output decreased and unemployment increased after the policies were implemented.” Is this statement true, false, or uncertain? Explain your answer.

Suppose you read that prospects for stronger future economic growth have led the dollar to strengthen and stock prices to increase.

a. What effect does the strengthened dollar have on the IS curve?

b. What effect does the increase in stock prices have on the IS curve?

c. What is the combined effect of these two events on the IS curve?

Assume that autonomous consumption is \(1,625 billion and disposable income is \)11,500 billion. Calculate consumption expenditure if an increase of \(1,000 in

disposable income leads to an increase of \)750 in consumption expenditure

Go to http://www.eurmacro.unisg.ch/Tutor/islm.html. Set the policy instruments to G = 80, t = 0.20, c = 0.75, and b = 40. Now increase government spending, G, from 80 to 160. By how much does the IS curve shift horizontally to the right? Why is the amount of shift greater than the increase in G? Now increase the marginal propensity to consume, c, from 0.75 to 0.90. In which direction does the IS curve shift, and why? By how much does it shift? Now increase the tax rate, t, from 0.20 to 0.28. In which direction does the IS curve shift, and why? By how much does it shift?

“Firms will increase production when planned investment is less than (actual) total investment.” Is this statement true, false, or uncertain? Explain your answer.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free